Li Debbie, Jensen Christine C
Division of Colon and Rectal Surgery, Department of Surgery, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, Minnesota.
Clin Colon Rectal Surg. 2019 Mar;32(2):138-144. doi: 10.1055/s-0038-1676480. Epub 2019 Feb 28.
While studies have demonstrated the benefits of Enhanced Recovery after Surgery (ERAS) programs in reducing length of stay and costs without increasing complications, fewer studies have evaluated patient satisfaction and quality of life (QOL) with enhanced recovery protocols. The aim of this project was to summarize the literature comparing satisfaction and quality of life after colorectal surgery following treatment within an ERAS protocol to standard postoperative care. The available evidence suggests patients suffer no detriment to satisfaction or quality of life with use of ERAS protocols, and may suffer less fatigue and return to activities sooner. Most publications reported no adverse effects on postoperative pain. However, a limited number of studies suggest patients may experience increased early postoperative pain with ERAS pathways, particularly following open colorectal procedures. Future research should focus on potential improvements in ERAS protocols to better manage postoperative pain. Overall, the evidence supports more widespread implementation of ERAS pathways in colorectal surgery.
虽然研究表明,术后加速康复(ERAS)方案在不增加并发症的情况下,具有缩短住院时间和降低成本的益处,但较少有研究评估患者对强化康复方案的满意度和生活质量(QOL)。本项目的目的是总结相关文献,比较在ERAS方案治疗下与标准术后护理相比,结直肠手术后的满意度和生活质量。现有证据表明,使用ERAS方案不会损害患者的满意度或生活质量,而且可能疲劳感减轻,能更快恢复日常活动。大多数出版物报告称对术后疼痛没有不良影响。然而,少数研究表明,患者在采用ERAS路径时可能会在术后早期经历更多疼痛,尤其是在开放性结直肠手术之后。未来的研究应聚焦于ERAS方案的潜在改进,以更好地管理术后疼痛。总体而言,证据支持在结直肠手术中更广泛地实施ERAS路径。