Knowles Heidi, Huggins Charles, Robinson Richard D, Mbugua Rosalia, Laureano-Phillips Jessica, Trivedi Shrunjal M, Kirby Jessica, Zenarosa Nestor R, Wang Hao
Department of Emergency Medicine, Integrative Emergency Services, John Peter Smith Health Network, 1500 S. Main St., Fort Worth, TX 76104, USA.
Department of Family Medicine, Texas College of Osteopathic Medicine, University of North Texas Health Science Center, 3500 Camp Bowie Blvd, Fort Worth, TX 76107, USA.
J Clin Med Res. 2019 Mar;11(3):157-164. doi: 10.14740/jocmr3747. Epub 2019 Feb 13.
We aim to externally validate the status of emergency department (ED) appropriate utilization and 72-h ED returns among homeless patients.
This is a retrospective single-center observational study. Patients were divided into two groups (homeless versus non-homeless). Patients' general characteristics, clinical variables, ED appropriate utilization, and ED return disposition deviations were compared and analyzed separately.
Study enrolled a total of 63,990 ED visits. Homeless patients comprised 9.3% (5,926) of visits. Higher ED 72-h returns occurred among homeless patients in comparison to the non-homeless patients (17% versus 5%, P < 0.001). Rate of significant ED disposition deviations (e.g., admission, triage to operation room, or death) on return visits were lower in homeless patients when compared to non-homeless patient populations (15% versus 23%, P < 0.001).
Though ED return rate was higher among homeless patients, return visit case management seems appropriate, indicating that 72-h ED returns might not be an optimal healthcare quality measurement for homeless patients.
我们旨在对外验证急诊科(ED)对无家可归患者的合理利用情况以及72小时内返回急诊科的情况。
这是一项回顾性单中心观察性研究。患者被分为两组(无家可归者与非无家可归者)。分别比较和分析患者的一般特征、临床变量、急诊科合理利用情况以及返回急诊科的处置偏差。
该研究共纳入63990次急诊科就诊病例。无家可归患者占就诊病例的9.3%(5926例)。与非无家可归患者相比,无家可归患者72小时内返回急诊科的比例更高(17%对5%,P<0.001)。与非无家可归患者群体相比,无家可归患者复诊时出现显著急诊科处置偏差(如入院、分诊至手术室或死亡)的比例较低(15%对23%,P<0.001)。
尽管无家可归患者返回急诊科的比例较高,但复诊病例管理似乎是合适的,这表明72小时内返回急诊科可能不是衡量无家可归患者医疗质量的最佳指标。