Suppr超能文献

联合新鲜冰冻血浆和冷冻上清液在血栓性血小板减少性紫癜的治疗性血浆置换中的应用:单中心经验。

Combination of Fresh Frozen Plasma and Cryosupernatant Plasma for Therapeutic Plasma Exchange in Thrombotic Thrombocytopenic Purpura: A Single Institution Experience.

机构信息

Department of Blood Transfusion, Fujian Medical University Union Hospital, Gulou District, Fuzhou City, Fujian Province 350001, China.

Department of Hematology, Fujian Medical University Union Hospital and Fujian Institute of Hematology, Gulou District, Fuzhou City, Fujian Province 350001, China.

出版信息

Biomed Res Int. 2019 Jan 30;2019:1756109. doi: 10.1155/2019/1756109. eCollection 2019.

Abstract

PURPOSE

To evaluate the impact of a combination of fresh frozen plasma (FFP) and cryosupernatant plasma (CP) as a replacement fluid in therapeutic plasma exchange (TPE) on early therapeutic response and long-term survival of patients with thrombotic thrombocytopenic purpura (TTP).

MATERIALS AND METHODS

A total of 44 patients with suspected TTP were screened by Bentley and PLASMIC scores. Twenty-seven patients treated with TPE using the FFP and CP combination as the replacement fluid were enrolled and divided into two groups: 11 patients who received TPE with CP-dominant replacement fluid (FFP/CP<1) and 16 patients who received TPE with FFP-dominant replacement fluid (FFP/CP>1).

RESULTS

There were no significant differences in the demographic and clinicopathological characteristics between the two groups except for the international normalized ratio (INR). The number of TPE procedures was lower, and time to achieve complete response was shorter in the CP-dominant group than in the FFP-dominant group. There were no significant differences in overall survival between the two groups.

CONCLUSION

The CP-dominant replacement fluid was superior to the FFP-dominant replacement fluid in early response to TPE in patients with TTP, but did not impact the patients' overall survival.

摘要

目的

评估新鲜冷冻血浆(FFP)和冷冻上清液血浆(CP)联合作为治疗性血浆置换(TPE)替代液对血栓性血小板减少性紫癜(TTP)患者早期治疗反应和长期生存的影响。

材料和方法

通过 Bentley 和 PLASMIC 评分筛选出 44 例疑似 TTP 的患者。纳入 27 例接受 TPE 治疗且使用 FFP 和 CP 联合作为替代液的患者,并将其分为两组:11 例接受 CP 为主的 TPE 替代液治疗(FFP/CP<1),16 例接受 FFP 为主的 TPE 替代液治疗(FFP/CP>1)。

结果

两组患者的人口统计学和临床病理特征除国际标准化比值(INR)外均无显著差异。CP 为主组的 TPE 治疗次数较少,完全缓解时间较短。两组患者的总体生存率无显著差异。

结论

在 TTP 患者中,CP 为主的 TPE 替代液在早期治疗反应方面优于 FFP 为主的 TPE 替代液,但对患者的总体生存率没有影响。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/cdfd/6374794/ddb654c6403c/BMRI2019-1756109.001.jpg

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验