1 Department of Genetics, Evolution, and Environment, University College London , Gower Street, London WC1E 6BT , UK.
4 School of Geography, Earth, and Environmental Science, University of Birmingham , Edgbaston B15 2TT , UK.
Proc Biol Sci. 2019 Mar 13;286(1898):20182418. doi: 10.1098/rspb.2018.2418.
Resolving the timing and pattern of early placental mammal evolution has been confounded by conflict among divergence date estimates from interpretation of the fossil record and from molecular-clock dating studies. Despite both fossil occurrences and molecular sequences favouring a Cretaceous origin for Placentalia, no unambiguous Cretaceous placental mammal has been discovered. Investigating the differing patterns of evolution in morphological and molecular data reveals a possible explanation for this conflict. Here, we quantified the relationship between morphological and molecular rates of evolution. We show that, independent of divergence dates, morphological rates of evolution were slow relative to molecular evolution during the initial divergence of Placentalia, but substantially increased during the origination of the extant orders. The rapid radiation of placentals into a highly morphologically disparate Cenozoic fauna is thus not associated with the origin of Placentalia, but post-dates superordinal origins. These findings predict that early members of major placental groups may not be easily distinguishable from one another or from stem eutherians on the basis of skeleto-dental morphology. This result supports a Late Cretaceous origin of crown placentals with an ordinal-level adaptive radiation in the early Paleocene, with the high relative rate permitting rapid anatomical change without requiring unreasonably fast molecular evolutionary rates. The lack of definitive Cretaceous placental mammals may be a result of morphological similarity among stem and early crown eutherians, providing an avenue for reconciling the fossil record with molecular divergence estimates for Placentalia.
解决早期胎盘哺乳动物进化的时间和模式一直受到化石记录解释和分子钟测年研究中分歧日期估计之间的冲突所困扰。尽管化石和分子序列都支持胎盘动物起源于白垩纪,但尚未发现明确的白垩纪胎盘哺乳动物。研究形态和分子数据的不同进化模式为这种冲突提供了一个可能的解释。在这里,我们量化了形态和分子进化率之间的关系。我们表明,独立于分歧日期,在胎盘动物最初分歧时,形态进化率相对于分子进化缓慢,但在现存目起源时大大增加。因此,胎盘动物在新生代高度形态上不同的动物群中的快速辐射与胎盘动物的起源无关,而是发生在超目起源之后。这些发现预测,主要胎盘类群的早期成员可能不容易与其他胎盘类群或与骨干真兽类区分开来,而骨骼牙齿形态的差异可能并不明显。这一结果支持了冠胎盘动物的晚白垩纪起源和早古新世的目级适应性辐射,相对较高的速率允许快速的解剖结构变化,而不需要不合理的快速分子进化速率。缺乏明确的白垩纪胎盘哺乳动物可能是由于骨干和早期冠真兽类之间的形态相似性所致,为协调化石记录与胎盘动物的分子分歧估计提供了一种途径。