• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

相似文献

1
Cumulative Toxicity in Targeted Therapies: What to Expect at the Recommended Phase II Dose.靶向治疗的累积毒性:在推荐的 II 期剂量时应注意什么。
J Natl Cancer Inst. 2019 Nov 1;111(11):1179-1185. doi: 10.1093/jnci/djz024.
2
Revisiting the definition of dose-limiting toxicities in paediatric oncology phase I clinical trials: An analysis from the Innovative Therapies for Children with Cancer Consortium.重新审视儿科肿瘤I期临床试验中剂量限制毒性的定义:来自儿童癌症创新疗法联盟的分析
Eur J Cancer. 2017 Nov;86:275-284. doi: 10.1016/j.ejca.2017.09.015. Epub 2017 Oct 19.
3
Beyond the dose-limiting toxicity period: Dermatologic adverse events of patients on phase 1 trials of the Cancer Therapeutics Evaluation Program.超越剂量限制毒性期:癌症治疗评估计划1期试验患者的皮肤不良事件
Cancer. 2016 Apr 15;122(8):1228-37. doi: 10.1002/cncr.29918. Epub 2016 Feb 24.
4
Predictors for establishing recommended phase 2 doses: analysis of 320 dose-seeking oncology phase 1 trials.预测建立推荐的 2 期剂量的指标:320 项探索性肿瘤学 1 期试验的分析。
Invest New Drugs. 2012 Apr;30(2):653-61. doi: 10.1007/s10637-010-9574-4. Epub 2010 Nov 4.
5
A new approach to integrate toxicity grade and repeated treatment cycles in the analysis and reporting of phase I dose-finding trials.一种新方法,用于在 I 期剂量探索试验的分析和报告中整合毒性等级和重复治疗周期。
Ann Oncol. 2015 Feb;26(2):422-8. doi: 10.1093/annonc/mdu523. Epub 2014 Nov 17.
6
Towards using a full spectrum of early clinical trial data: a retrospective analysis to compare potential longitudinal categorical models for molecular targeted therapies in oncology.迈向使用全谱早期临床试验数据:一项回顾性分析,以比较肿瘤学中分子靶向治疗的潜在纵向分类模型
Stat Med. 2015 Sep 30;34(22):2999-3016. doi: 10.1002/sim.6548. Epub 2015 Jun 8.
7
Determinants of the recommended phase 2 dose of molecular targeted agents.分子靶向药物推荐的2期剂量的决定因素。
Cancer. 2017 Apr 15;123(8):1409-1415. doi: 10.1002/cncr.30579. Epub 2017 Feb 9.
8
Meta-analysis of the relationship between dose and benefit in phase I targeted agent trials.I 期靶向药物试验中剂量与疗效关系的 Meta 分析。
J Natl Cancer Inst. 2012 Dec 19;104(24):1860-6. doi: 10.1093/jnci/djs439. Epub 2012 Nov 19.
9
Case Example of Dose Optimization Using Data From Bortezomib Dose-Finding Clinical Trials.使用硼替佐米剂量探索性临床试验数据进行剂量优化的案例
J Clin Oncol. 2016 Apr 20;34(12):1395-401. doi: 10.1200/JCO.2015.66.0662. Epub 2016 Feb 29.
10
Towards new methods for the determination of dose limiting toxicities and the assessment of the recommended dose for further studies of molecularly targeted agents--dose-Limiting Toxicity and Toxicity Assessment Recommendation Group for Early Trials of Targeted therapies, an European Organisation for Research and Treatment of Cancer-led study.针对新型方法以确定剂量限制性毒性和评估分子靶向药物进一步研究的推荐剂量 - 欧洲癌症研究与治疗组织主导的靶向治疗早期试验的剂量限制毒性和毒性评估推荐小组的研究。
Eur J Cancer. 2014 Aug;50(12):2040-9. doi: 10.1016/j.ejca.2014.04.031. Epub 2014 May 28.

引用本文的文献

1
Comprehensive Evaluation of Drug-Related Problems and Pharmacotherapy Patterns in Non-Hodgkin's Lymphoma Patients in Yemen.也门非霍奇金淋巴瘤患者药物相关问题及药物治疗模式的综合评估
Blood Lymphat Cancer. 2025 Sep 4;15:149-166. doi: 10.2147/BLCTT.S538606. eCollection 2025.
2
Mitochondrial ribosomal proteins: potential targets for cancer prognosis and therapy.线粒体核糖体蛋白:癌症预后和治疗的潜在靶点。
Front Oncol. 2025 Apr 30;15:1586137. doi: 10.3389/fonc.2025.1586137. eCollection 2025.
3
Joint TITE-CRM: A Design for Dose Finding Studies for Therapies with Late-Onset Safety and Activity Outcomes.联合TITE-CRM:针对具有迟发性安全性和活性结果的疗法进行剂量探索研究的一种设计。
Stat Biopharm Res. 2024 Mar 20;17(1):149-160. doi: 10.1080/19466315.2024.2333388. eCollection 2025.

本文引用的文献

1
On the analysis of discrete time competing risks data.关于离散时间竞争风险数据的分析。
Biometrics. 2018 Dec;74(4):1468-1481. doi: 10.1111/biom.12881. Epub 2018 Apr 17.
2
Phase I/II dose-finding design for molecularly targeted agent: Plateau determination using adaptive randomization.分子靶向药物的I/II期剂量探索设计:使用适应性随机化确定平台期
Stat Methods Med Res. 2018 Feb;27(2):466-479. doi: 10.1177/0962280216631763. Epub 2016 Mar 17.
3
Management of immune checkpoint blockade dysimmune toxicities: a collaborative position paper.免疫检查点阻断相关性免疫毒性的管理:一份合作立场文件。
Ann Oncol. 2016 Apr;27(4):559-74. doi: 10.1093/annonc/mdv623. Epub 2015 Dec 28.
4
Dose finding with longitudinal data: simpler models, richer outcomes.基于纵向数据的剂量探索:更简单的模型,更丰富的结果。
Stat Med. 2015 Sep 30;34(22):2983-98. doi: 10.1002/sim.6552. Epub 2015 Jun 24.
5
Using Data Augmentation to Facilitate Conduct of Phase I-II Clinical Trials with Delayed Outcomes.利用数据增强促进具有延迟结果的I-II期临床试验的开展。
J Am Stat Assoc. 2014;109(506):525-536. doi: 10.1080/01621459.2014.881740.
6
Evaluation of statistical designs in phase I expansion cohorts: the Dana-Farber/Harvard Cancer Center experience.评价 I 期扩展队列中统计设计:丹娜-法伯/哈佛癌症中心的经验。
J Natl Cancer Inst. 2014 Jun 24;106(7). doi: 10.1093/jnci/dju163. Print 2014 Jul.
7
Seamless Phase I/II Adaptive Design for Oncology Trials of Molecularly Targeted Agents.分子靶向药物肿瘤学试验的无缝I/II期适应性设计
J Biopharm Stat. 2015;25(5):903-20. doi: 10.1080/10543406.2014.920873. Epub 2014 Jun 6.
8
Towards new methods for the determination of dose limiting toxicities and the assessment of the recommended dose for further studies of molecularly targeted agents--dose-Limiting Toxicity and Toxicity Assessment Recommendation Group for Early Trials of Targeted therapies, an European Organisation for Research and Treatment of Cancer-led study.针对新型方法以确定剂量限制性毒性和评估分子靶向药物进一步研究的推荐剂量 - 欧洲癌症研究与治疗组织主导的靶向治疗早期试验的剂量限制毒性和毒性评估推荐小组的研究。
Eur J Cancer. 2014 Aug;50(12):2040-9. doi: 10.1016/j.ejca.2014.04.031. Epub 2014 May 28.
9
A Bayesian approach to dose-finding studies for cancer therapies: incorporating later cycles of therapy.一种用于癌症治疗剂量探索研究的贝叶斯方法:纳入后续治疗周期
Stat Med. 2014 Jul 10;33(15):2665-80. doi: 10.1002/sim.6132. Epub 2014 Mar 4.
10
Predictive value of phase I trials for safety in later trials and final approved dose: analysis of 61 approved cancer drugs.I 期临床试验对后期试验和最终批准剂量安全性的预测价值:61 种批准癌症药物的分析。
Clin Cancer Res. 2014 Jan 15;20(2):281-8. doi: 10.1158/1078-0432.CCR-13-2103. Epub 2013 Nov 4.

靶向治疗的累积毒性:在推荐的 II 期剂量时应注意什么。

Cumulative Toxicity in Targeted Therapies: What to Expect at the Recommended Phase II Dose.

出版信息

J Natl Cancer Inst. 2019 Nov 1;111(11):1179-1185. doi: 10.1093/jnci/djz024.

DOI:10.1093/jnci/djz024
PMID:30838405
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC6855968/
Abstract

BACKGROUND

In the era of molecularly targeted agents (MTAs), it is recommended to account for toxicity over several cycles to identify the recommended phase II dose (RP2D). We investigated the relationship between the risk of toxicity at cycle 1 and the cumulative incidence of toxicity over subsequent cycles in trials of single MTAs.

METHODS

On individual patient data from 26 phase I clinical trials of single MTAs provided by the National Cancer Institute, we estimated the probability of first-severe toxicity per treatment cycle as well as the cumulative incidence at, below, and above the maximum tolerated dose (MTD). Toxicity was further subclassified into nonhematologic and hematologic. A prediction table was developed to estimate the cumulative incidence up to six cycles based on the toxicity rate observed in the first cycle.

RESULTS

Overall, 942 patients were included. For patients treated at the MTD, the probability of first-severe toxicity decreased from 24.8% (95% prediction interval [PI] = 20.3% to 32.9%) to 2.2% (95% PI = 0.1% to 7.7%) from cycle 1 to 6, whereas the cumulative incidence of toxicity reached 51.7% (95% PI = 40.5% to 66.3%) after six cycles. Toxicity rates ranging from 20.0% to 30.0% in the first cycle were associated with 46.8% (95% PI = 39.5% to 54.2%) and 65.8% (95% PI = 57.7% to 73.1%) cumulative incidence after six cycles.

CONCLUSION

This study examined the risk of severe toxicity over time of single MTAs. The cumulative incidence of toxicity at the MTD was higher than the usually accepted toxicity targets, challenging the definition of the RP2D of MTAs. The prediction table may help calibrate the target rate at the RP2D.

摘要

背景

在分子靶向药物(MTAs)时代,建议在多个周期内评估毒性以确定推荐的 II 期剂量(RP2D)。我们研究了单药 MTAs 临床试验中第 1 周期毒性风险与后续周期毒性累积发生率之间的关系。

方法

我们利用美国国家癌症研究所提供的 26 项单药 MTAs 的个体患者数据,估计每个治疗周期的首次严重毒性的概率以及最大耐受剂量(MTD)以下、以下和以上的毒性累积发生率。毒性进一步分为非血液学和血液学毒性。根据第 1 周期观察到的毒性发生率,制定了一个预测表来估计到第 6 周期的累积发生率。

结果

共纳入 942 例患者。对于在 MTD 治疗的患者,第 1 周期严重毒性的概率从 24.8%(95%预测区间[PI] = 20.3%至 32.9%)降至第 6 周期的 2.2%(95%PI = 0.1%至 7.7%),而毒性累积发生率在 6 个周期后达到 51.7%(95%PI = 40.5%至 66.3%)。第 1 周期的毒性发生率在 20.0%至 30.0%之间与第 6 周期的 46.8%(95%PI = 39.5%至 54.2%)和 65.8%(95%PI = 57.7%至 73.1%)的累积发生率相关。

结论

本研究考察了单药 MTAs 随时间发生严重毒性的风险。MTD 毒性的累积发生率高于通常接受的毒性目标,这对 MTAs 的 RP2D 定义提出了挑战。预测表可能有助于校准 RP2D 的目标率。