• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

I 期临床试验对后期试验和最终批准剂量安全性的预测价值:61 种批准癌症药物的分析。

Predictive value of phase I trials for safety in later trials and final approved dose: analysis of 61 approved cancer drugs.

机构信息

Authors' Affiliations: Phase I Clinical Trials Program, Department of Investigational Cancer Therapeutics; Department of Biostatistics, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas; Department of Clinical Medicine, Hemocentro da Unicamp, University of Campinas, Sao Paulo, Brazil; Karmanos Cancer Institute/Wayne State University, Detroit, Michigan; and Department of Medicine, University of California, San Diego, La Jolla, California.

出版信息

Clin Cancer Res. 2014 Jan 15;20(2):281-8. doi: 10.1158/1078-0432.CCR-13-2103. Epub 2013 Nov 4.

DOI:10.1158/1078-0432.CCR-13-2103
PMID:24190980
Abstract

Phase I trials use a small number of patients to define a maximum tolerated dose (MTD) and the safety of new agents. We compared data from phase I and registration trials to determine whether early trials predicted later safety and final dose. We searched the U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA) website for drugs approved in nonpediatric cancers (January 1990-October 2012). The recommended phase II dose (R2PD) and toxicities from phase I were compared with doses and safety in later trials. In 62 of 85 (73%) matched trials, the dose from the later trial was within 20% of the RP2D. In a multivariable analysis, phase I trials of targeted agents were less predictive of the final approved dose (OR, 0.2 for adopting ± 20% of the RP2D for targeted vs. other classes; P = 0.025). Of the 530 clinically relevant toxicities in later trials, 70% (n = 374) were described in phase I. A significant relationship (P = 0.0032) between increasing the number of patients in phase I (up to 60) and the ability to describe future clinically relevant toxicities was observed. Among 28,505 patients in later trials, the death rate that was related to drug was 1.41%. In conclusion, dosing based on phase I trials was associated with a low toxicity-related death rate in later trials. The ability to predict relevant toxicities correlates with the number of patients on the initial phase I trial. The final dose approved was within 20% of the RP2D in 73% of assessed trials.

摘要

I 期临床试验使用少量患者来确定最大耐受剂量 (MTD) 和新药物的安全性。我们比较了 I 期和注册试验的数据,以确定早期试验是否能预测后期安全性和最终剂量。我们在美国食品和药物管理局 (FDA) 网站上搜索了非儿科癌症批准的药物(1990 年 1 月至 2012 年 10 月)。比较了 I 期推荐的 II 期剂量 (R2PD) 和毒性与后期试验的剂量和安全性。在 85 项匹配试验中的 62 项(73%)中,后期试验的剂量在 R2PD 的 20%以内。在多变量分析中,靶向药物的 I 期试验对最终批准剂量的预测性较低(OR,针对靶向药物和其他类别的 R2PD 采用±20%的目标,为 0.2;P=0.025)。在后期试验的 530 种临床相关毒性中,70%(n=374)在 I 期描述过。观察到 I 期患者数量增加(最多 60 例)与描述未来临床相关毒性的能力之间存在显著关系(P=0.0032)。在后期试验的 28505 例患者中,与药物相关的死亡率为 1.41%。结论:基于 I 期试验的剂量与后期试验中较低的毒性相关死亡率相关。预测相关毒性的能力与初始 I 期试验的患者数量相关。在评估的试验中,73%的试验最终批准剂量在 R2PD 的 20%以内。

相似文献

1
Predictive value of phase I trials for safety in later trials and final approved dose: analysis of 61 approved cancer drugs.I 期临床试验对后期试验和最终批准剂量安全性的预测价值:61 种批准癌症药物的分析。
Clin Cancer Res. 2014 Jan 15;20(2):281-8. doi: 10.1158/1078-0432.CCR-13-2103. Epub 2013 Nov 4.
2
Determinants of the recommended phase 2 dose of molecular targeted agents.分子靶向药物推荐的2期剂量的决定因素。
Cancer. 2017 Apr 15;123(8):1409-1415. doi: 10.1002/cncr.30579. Epub 2017 Feb 9.
3
Starting dose selection and dose escalation for oncology small molecule first-in-patient trials: learnings from a survey of FDA-approved drugs.肿瘤小分子首次患者试验的起始剂量选择和剂量递增:来自 FDA 批准药物调查的经验教训。
Cancer Chemother Pharmacol. 2021 Jan;87(1):23-30. doi: 10.1007/s00280-020-04202-0. Epub 2020 Nov 25.
4
Revisiting the definition of dose-limiting toxicities in paediatric oncology phase I clinical trials: An analysis from the Innovative Therapies for Children with Cancer Consortium.重新审视儿科肿瘤I期临床试验中剂量限制毒性的定义:来自儿童癌症创新疗法联盟的分析
Eur J Cancer. 2017 Nov;86:275-284. doi: 10.1016/j.ejca.2017.09.015. Epub 2017 Oct 19.
5
Relationship Between Response and Dose in Published, Contemporary Phase I Oncology Trials.发表的当代肿瘤学 I 期临床试验中反应与剂量的关系。
J Natl Compr Canc Netw. 2020 Apr;18(4):428-433. doi: 10.6004/jnccn.2019.7375.
6
A review of dose escalation for FDA-approved products treating solid tumors and hematological malignancies in first-in-human trials.在首次人体试验中,评估 FDA 批准的用于治疗实体瘤和血液系统恶性肿瘤的产品的剂量递增。
Clin Transl Oncol. 2024 Sep;26(9):2116-2125. doi: 10.1007/s12094-024-03451-2. Epub 2024 Apr 1.
7
Dosing targeted and cytotoxic two-drug combinations: Lessons learned from analysis of 24,326 patients reported 2010 through 2013.靶向给药和细胞毒性双药联合治疗:从对2010年至2013年报告的24326例患者的分析中吸取的经验教训。
Int J Cancer. 2016 Nov 1;139(9):2135-41. doi: 10.1002/ijc.30262. Epub 2016 Jul 22.
8
Predicting success in regulatory approval from Phase I results.根据一期试验结果预测监管审批的成功率。
Cancer Chemother Pharmacol. 2014 Nov;74(5):1099-103. doi: 10.1007/s00280-014-2596-4. Epub 2014 Sep 23.
9
Predictors for establishing recommended phase 2 doses: analysis of 320 dose-seeking oncology phase 1 trials.预测建立推荐的 2 期剂量的指标:320 项探索性肿瘤学 1 期试验的分析。
Invest New Drugs. 2012 Apr;30(2):653-61. doi: 10.1007/s10637-010-9574-4. Epub 2010 Nov 4.
10
Impact of race on dose selection of molecular-targeted agents in early-phase oncology trials.种族对早期肿瘤试验中分子靶向药物剂量选择的影响。
Br J Cancer. 2018 Jun;118(12):1571-1579. doi: 10.1038/s41416-018-0102-1. Epub 2018 May 24.

引用本文的文献

1
A Bayesian Dynamic Model-Based Adaptive Design for Oncology Dose Optimization in Phase I/II Clinical Trials.用于I/II期临床试验肿瘤学剂量优化的基于贝叶斯动态模型的自适应设计
Pharm Stat. 2025 Mar-Apr;24(2):e2451. doi: 10.1002/pst.2451. Epub 2024 Nov 10.
2
Realizing the promise of Project Optimus: Challenges and emerging opportunities for dose optimization in oncology drug development.实现 Project Optimus 的承诺:肿瘤药物开发中剂量优化的挑战和新兴机遇。
CPT Pharmacometrics Syst Pharmacol. 2024 May;13(5):691-709. doi: 10.1002/psp4.13079. Epub 2024 Mar 21.
3
Exploratory Analysis of Drug Lag in New Oncology Drugs Between Japan and the US.
探索日美两国新抗肿瘤药物的药物上市滞后情况
Ther Innov Regul Sci. 2023 Jul;57(4):671-677. doi: 10.1007/s43441-023-00512-6. Epub 2023 Mar 25.
4
Anti-cancer drug combinations approved by US FDA from 2011 to 2021: main design features of clinical trials and role of pharmacokinetics.2011 年至 2021 年美国 FDA 批准的抗癌药物联合治疗方案:临床试验的主要设计特点和药代动力学作用。
Cancer Chemother Pharmacol. 2022 Oct;90(4):285-299. doi: 10.1007/s00280-022-04467-7. Epub 2022 Aug 27.
5
Somatostatin analogues in treatment-refractory meningioma: a systematic review with meta-analysis of individual patient data.治疗抵抗性脑膜瘤中的生长抑素类似物:一项系统评价和个体患者数据荟萃分析。
Neurosurg Rev. 2022 Oct;45(5):3067-3081. doi: 10.1007/s10143-022-01849-6. Epub 2022 Aug 19.
6
Evaluation of toxicities related to novel therapy in clinical trials for women with gynecologic cancer.妇科恶性肿瘤临床试验中新疗法相关毒性的评价。
Cancer. 2020 May 15;126(10):2139-2145. doi: 10.1002/cncr.32783. Epub 2020 Feb 25.
7
Efficacy and safety of anticancer drug combinations: a meta-analysis of randomized trials with a focus on immunotherapeutics and gene-targeted compounds.抗癌药物联合使用的疗效与安全性:一项聚焦于免疫疗法和基因靶向化合物的随机试验的荟萃分析。
Oncoimmunology. 2020 Jan 13;9(1):1710052. doi: 10.1080/2162402X.2019.1710052. eCollection 2020.
8
Phase I trials as valid therapeutic options for patients with cancer.I 期临床试验是癌症患者有效的治疗选择。
Nat Rev Clin Oncol. 2019 Dec;16(12):773-778. doi: 10.1038/s41571-019-0262-9. Epub 2019 Sep 2.
9
Cumulative Toxicity in Targeted Therapies: What to Expect at the Recommended Phase II Dose.靶向治疗的累积毒性:在推荐的 II 期剂量时应注意什么。
J Natl Cancer Inst. 2019 Nov 1;111(11):1179-1185. doi: 10.1093/jnci/djz024.
10
Lessons From the Development of the Immune Checkpoint Inhibitors in Oncology.肿瘤免疫检查点抑制剂研发的经验教训
Integr Cancer Ther. 2018 Dec;17(4):1012-1015. doi: 10.1177/1534735418801524. Epub 2018 Sep 19.