Institute of Toxicology and Genetics, Karlsruhe Institute of Technology, Hermann-von- Helmholtz-Platz 1, 76344, Eggenstein-Leopoldshafen, Germany.
School of Food Safety, College of Nutrition, Taipei Medical University, 250 Wuxing St., Taipei, 11031, Taiwan.
Arch Toxicol. 2019 Apr;93(4):871-885. doi: 10.1007/s00204-019-02422-9. Epub 2019 Mar 5.
Engineered amorphous silica nanoparticles (nanosilica) are one of the most abundant nanomaterials and are widely used in industry. Furthermore, novel nanosilica materials are promising theranostic tools for biomedicine. However, hazardous effects of nanosilica especially after inhalation into the lung have been documented. Therefore, the safe development of nanosilica materials urgently requires predictive assays to monitor toxicity. Here, we further investigate the impact of the protein corona on the biological activity of two different types of nanosilica (colloidal and pyrogenic) in lung cells. As previously described, adsorption of serum proteins to the nanosilica surface suppresses cytotoxicity in macrophages and lung epithelial cells. As the increase of pro-inflammatory mediators is a hallmark of inflammation in the lung upon nanosilica exposure, we studied the potential coupling of the cytotoxic and pro-inflammatory response in A549 human lung epithelial cells and RAW264.7 mouse macrophages. Indeed, cytotoxicity precedes the onset of pro-inflammatory gene expression and cytokine release as exemplified for IL-8 in A549 cells and TNF-alpha in RAW264.7 macrophages after exposure to 0-100 µg/mL nanosilica in medium without serum. Formation of a protein corona not only inhibited cellular toxicity, but also the pro-inflammatory response. Of note, uptake of nanosilica into cells was negligible in the absence, but enhanced in the presence of a protein corona. Hence, the prevailing explanation that the protein corona simply interferes with cellular uptake thus preventing adverse effects needs to be revisited. In conclusion, for the reliable prediction of adverse effects of nanosilica in the lung, in vitro assays should be performed in media not complemented with complete serum. However, in case of different exposure routes, e.g., injection into the blood stream as intended for biomedicine, the protein corona prevents acute toxic actions of nanosilica.
工程化无定形二氧化硅纳米颗粒(纳米硅)是最丰富的纳米材料之一,广泛应用于工业。此外,新型纳米硅材料有望成为生物医学的治疗诊断一体化工具。然而,纳米硅吸入肺部后的危害性影响已被记录在案。因此,迫切需要预测性检测来监测其毒性,以安全开发纳米硅材料。在这里,我们进一步研究了蛋白质冠对两种不同类型的纳米硅(胶体和热解法)在肺细胞中的生物学活性的影响。如前所述,血清蛋白吸附到纳米硅表面会抑制巨噬细胞和肺上皮细胞的细胞毒性。由于促炎介质的增加是纳米硅暴露后肺部炎症的标志,我们研究了 A549 人肺上皮细胞和 RAW264.7 小鼠巨噬细胞中细胞毒性和促炎反应的潜在耦合。事实上,细胞毒性先于促炎基因表达和细胞因子释放开始,以 A549 细胞中的 IL-8 和 RAW264.7 巨噬细胞中的 TNF-α为例,在无血清培养基中暴露于 0-100μg/mL 纳米硅后。蛋白质冠的形成不仅抑制了细胞毒性,还抑制了促炎反应。值得注意的是,在没有蛋白质冠的情况下,纳米硅几乎不会被细胞摄取,但在有蛋白质冠的情况下会增强摄取。因此,需要重新审视蛋白质冠只是干扰细胞摄取从而防止不良影响的主流解释。总之,为了可靠预测纳米硅在肺部的不良影响,在体外检测中不应使用补充完全血清的培养基。然而,在不同的暴露途径下,例如,如预期用于生物医学的注射到血流中,蛋白质冠可防止纳米硅的急性毒性作用。