Faculty of Dentistry, Division of Oral Health and Society, McGill University, Montreal, Quebec, Canada.
Johns Hopkins Bloomberg School of Public Health, Baltimore, Maryland.
J Oral Pathol Med. 2019 May;48(5):358-364. doi: 10.1111/jop.12845. Epub 2019 Mar 27.
The present systematic review sought to evaluate the effects of Sodium Lauryl Sulfate (SLS)-free compared to SLS-containing dentifrices on (Recurrent) aphthous stomatitis (RAS) in patients with this condition. Cochrane, Medline (PubMed) and Embase databases, and some trial registries were searched through December 2017. There was no language, nor publication year restrictions. We included double-blinded randomized controlled trials that compared the effects of dentifrices with and without SLS on RAS in humans. Data extraction was compliant with PRISMA guidelines and the Cochrane Handbook for Systematic Reviews of Interventions. PROSPERO 2018:CRD42018086001. Four trials were included in this review (all crossover studies; n = 124 participants) and two contributed to the main meta-analysis based on the random-effect model. SLS-free dentifrice, when compared to SLS-containing statistically significantly, reduced the number of ulcers, duration of ulcer, number of episodes, and ulcer pain. Sensitivity analysis of the four studies as parallel-group trials shows a consistent direction of effect in favor of SLS-free dentifrice usage. In conclusion, the qualitative and quantitative synthesis of the eligible trials for this review showed that use of SLS-free consistently reduced all four parameters of ulcers measured. The available evidence suggests that patients with RAS may benefit from using SLS-free dentifrices for their daily oral care. However, future well-designed trials are still required to strengthen the current body of evidence.
本系统评价旨在评估无十二烷基硫酸钠(SLS)与含 SLS 牙膏相比对复发性口腔溃疡(RAS)患者的影响。通过 Cochrane、Medline(PubMed)和 Embase 数据库以及一些试验注册处进行了检索,检索截至 2017 年 12 月。无语言和出版年限限制。我们纳入了比较 SLS 牙膏与不含 SLS 牙膏对人类 RAS 影响的双盲随机对照试验。数据提取符合 PRISMA 指南和 Cochrane 干预系统评价手册。PROSPERO 2018:CRD42018086001。本综述纳入了四项试验(均为交叉研究;n = 124 名参与者),其中两项试验根据随机效应模型对主要荟萃分析做出了贡献。与含 SLS 的牙膏相比,无 SLS 的牙膏在统计学上显著减少了溃疡数量、溃疡持续时间、发作次数和溃疡疼痛。对四项平行组试验的敏感性分析显示,无 SLS 牙膏使用的效果方向一致。总之,本综述中合格试验的定性和定量综合结果表明,使用无 SLS 的牙膏一致地减少了所有四个溃疡参数的测量值。现有证据表明,RAS 患者可能受益于使用无 SLS 的牙膏进行日常口腔护理。然而,仍需要未来设计良好的试验来加强当前的证据基础。