• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

在线纤维肌痛信息的准确性、完整性和可及性。

Accuracy, completeness and accessibility of online information on fibromyalgia.

机构信息

Department of Clinical and Experimental Medicine and Neuroscience, Brighton and Sussex Medical School, Falmer, Brighton, BN1 9RY, UK.

Centre of Resilience for Social Justice, School of Health Sciences, University of Brighton, Falmer, Brighton, UK.

出版信息

Rheumatol Int. 2019 Apr;39(4):735-742. doi: 10.1007/s00296-019-04265-0. Epub 2019 Mar 6.

DOI:10.1007/s00296-019-04265-0
PMID:30840100
Abstract

Fibromyalgia is a multi-factorial illness primarily characterised by widespread chronic pain and fatigue, with several symptoms and associated conditions. Due to a lack of clinical awareness and an absence of objective diagnostic measures, fibromyalgia patients often engage with online health information. The aim is to investigate the completeness and trustworthiness of the information available online on fibromyalgia. Google.co.uk was searched for 'fibromyalgia', the first 200 webpages were imported and 148 were analysed for standard health information quality criteria (JAMA score, HONcode) as well as completeness of information in terms of symptoms, causes and treatments mentioned. The most frequent typology of webpages was from health professionals (38%), with commercial websites being less frequent (7%). Overall, the quality, completeness and accessibility of online health information was poor. Completeness of coverage for symptoms, causes and associated conditions was especially lacking, with pages from not-for-profit organisations discussing the highest number of symptoms (median 8, min 0, max 11, interquartile range, IQR 4.5; n = 14) compared to the rest of the websites in the search engine results (median 4, min 0, max 11, IQR 4; n = 134). Mean readability was grade 9 (median 9, min 1, max 18, IQR 3), with only 8% websites meeting the recommended readability of grade 6. The Internet provides incomplete information on fibromyalgia, which does not fulfil the most queried aspect(s) by patients, symptoms, and may be difficult to understand by lay persons. Not-for-profit organisations provide the most complete information compared to other types of websites.

摘要

纤维肌痛症是一种多因素疾病,主要表现为广泛的慢性疼痛和疲劳,伴有多种症状和相关疾病。由于临床意识不足和缺乏客观的诊断措施,纤维肌痛症患者经常会查阅在线健康信息。本研究旨在调查网上关于纤维肌痛症的信息的完整性和可信度。在 Google.co.uk 上搜索“纤维肌痛症”,导入前 200 个网页,并对 148 个网页进行了标准健康信息质量标准(JAMA 评分、HONcode)以及所提到的症状、病因和治疗方法的信息完整性分析。最常见的网页类型是来自健康专业人员(38%),商业网站则较少(7%)。总体而言,在线健康信息的质量、完整性和可及性较差。症状、病因和相关疾病的覆盖完整性尤其缺乏,非营利组织的网页讨论的症状数量最多(中位数 8,最小 0,最大 11,四分位距,IQR 4.5;n=14),比搜索引擎结果中的其他网页(中位数 4,最小 0,最大 11,IQR 4;n=134)多。平均可读性为 9 级(中位数 9,最小 1,最大 18,IQR 3),只有 8%的网站符合推荐的 6 级可读性。互联网提供的关于纤维肌痛症的信息不完整,不能满足患者最常查询的方面(症状),并且可能对非专业人士来说难以理解。与其他类型的网站相比,非营利组织提供的信息最完整。

相似文献

1
Accuracy, completeness and accessibility of online information on fibromyalgia.在线纤维肌痛信息的准确性、完整性和可及性。
Rheumatol Int. 2019 Apr;39(4):735-742. doi: 10.1007/s00296-019-04265-0. Epub 2019 Mar 6.
2
Evaluating the Quality, Content, and Readability of Online Resources for Failed Back Spinal Surgery.评估失败性脊柱手术后在线资源的质量、内容和可读性。
Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2019 Apr 1;44(7):494-502. doi: 10.1097/BRS.0000000000002870.
3
Assessing the Accuracy and Readability of Online Health Information for Patients With Pancreatic Cancer.评估在线胰腺癌患者健康信息的准确性和可读性。
JAMA Surg. 2016 Sep 1;151(9):831-7. doi: 10.1001/jamasurg.2016.0730.
4
How good is online information on fibromyalgia? An analysis of quality and readability of websites on fibromyalgia in Spanish.在线纤维肌痛信息质量如何?对西班牙语纤维肌痛网站的质量和可读性分析。
BMJ Open. 2020 Jul 5;10(7):e037065. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2020-037065.
5
Quality of online information on breast cancer treatment options.乳腺癌治疗方案的在线信息质量。
Breast. 2018 Feb;37:6-12. doi: 10.1016/j.breast.2017.10.004. Epub 2017 Oct 15.
6
Separating the Wheat From the Chaff: An Evaluation of Readability, Quality, and Accuracy of Online Health Information for Treatment of Peyronie Disease.去伪存真:阴茎硬结症在线治疗健康信息的可读性、质量及准确性评估
Urology. 2018 Aug;118:59-64. doi: 10.1016/j.urology.2018.02.054. Epub 2018 Apr 30.
7
Quality and readability of online information on ankylosing spondylitis.强直性脊柱炎相关网络信息的质量和可读性。
Clin Rheumatol. 2019 Nov;38(11):3269-3274. doi: 10.1007/s10067-019-04706-y. Epub 2019 Aug 1.
8
Internet Websites for Chest Pain Symptoms Demonstrate Highly Variable Content and Quality.关于胸痛症状的互联网网站显示出内容和质量高度可变。
Acad Emerg Med. 2016 Oct;23(10):1146-1152. doi: 10.1111/acem.13039. Epub 2016 Sep 27.
9
Quality and readability of online information about piriformis syndrome.关于梨状肌综合征的在线信息的质量和可读性。
J Bodyw Mov Ther. 2024 Oct;40:2205-2210. doi: 10.1016/j.jbmt.2024.11.009. Epub 2024 Nov 5.
10
Quality, Reliability, Technical Quality, and Readability of Google Online Information on Childhood Glaucoma.谷歌在线儿童青光眼信息的质量、可靠性、技术质量和可读性。
J Pediatr Ophthalmol Strabismus. 2024 May-Jun;61(3):198-203. doi: 10.3928/01913913-20231114-01. Epub 2023 Dec 19.

引用本文的文献

1
Assessing parental comprehension of online resources on childhood pain.评估父母对儿童疼痛在线资源的理解程度。
Medicine (Baltimore). 2024 Jun 21;103(25):e38569. doi: 10.1097/MD.0000000000038569.
2
Online Patient Education Materials on Iron Deficiency Anemia Are Too Difficult to Read and Low Quality: A Readability and Quality Analysis.关于缺铁性贫血的在线患者教育材料阅读难度太大且质量低下:一项可读性与质量分析。
Cureus. 2023 Oct 12;15(10):e46902. doi: 10.7759/cureus.46902. eCollection 2023 Oct.
3
Quality and readability of online information on plantar fasciitis and calcaneal spur.

本文引用的文献

1
Nothing and Everything: Fibromyalgia as a Diagnosis of Exclusion and Inclusion.无有之间:纤维肌痛作为排除性和包容性诊断。
Qual Health Res. 2019 May;29(6):809-819. doi: 10.1177/1049732318804509. Epub 2018 Oct 8.
2
The quality of online health information on breast augmentation.隆胸手术在线健康信息的质量。
J Plast Reconstr Aesthet Surg. 2018 Oct;71(10):e62-e63. doi: 10.1016/j.bjps.2018.07.023. Epub 2018 Aug 6.
3
Facts and myths pertaining to fibromyalgia.与纤维肌痛相关的事实与误解。
足底筋膜炎和跟骨骨刺的在线信息的质量和可读性。
Rheumatol Int. 2022 Nov;42(11):1965-1972. doi: 10.1007/s00296-022-05165-6. Epub 2022 Jun 28.
4
Recruitment characteristics and non-adherence associated factors of fibromyalgia patients in a randomized clinical trial: A retrospective survival analysis.一项随机临床试验中纤维肌痛患者的招募特征及不依从相关因素:一项回顾性生存分析
Contemp Clin Trials Commun. 2021 Nov 17;24:100860. doi: 10.1016/j.conctc.2021.100860. eCollection 2021 Dec.
5
Pain and Cortisol in Patients with Fibromyalgia: Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.纤维肌痛患者的疼痛与皮质醇:系统评价与荟萃分析
Diagnostics (Basel). 2020 Nov 9;10(11):922. doi: 10.3390/diagnostics10110922.
6
Evaluating the reliability and readability of online information on osteoporosis.评估骨质疏松症在线信息的可靠性和可读性。
Arch Endocrinol Metab. 2021 Nov 1;65(1):85-92. doi: 10.20945/2359-3997000000311. Epub 2020 Nov 9.
7
Accuracy of Online Pictorial Resources for Common Hand Surgery Procedures.常见手部手术操作的在线图示资源的准确性。
Hand (N Y). 2022 Mar;17(2):361-365. doi: 10.1177/1558944720937360. Epub 2020 Jul 25.
8
How good is online information on fibromyalgia? An analysis of quality and readability of websites on fibromyalgia in Spanish.在线纤维肌痛信息质量如何?对西班牙语纤维肌痛网站的质量和可读性分析。
BMJ Open. 2020 Jul 5;10(7):e037065. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2020-037065.
9
Quality and readability of online information on ankylosing spondylitis.强直性脊柱炎相关网络信息的质量和可读性。
Clin Rheumatol. 2019 Nov;38(11):3269-3274. doi: 10.1007/s10067-019-04706-y. Epub 2019 Aug 1.
Dialogues Clin Neurosci. 2018 Mar;20(1):53-62. doi: 10.31887/DCNS.2018.20.1/whauser.
4
Accessibility of online self-management support websites for people with osteoarthritis: A text content analysis.骨关节炎患者在线自我管理支持网站的可及性:一项文本内容分析
Chronic Illn. 2019 Mar;15(1):27-40. doi: 10.1177/1742395317746471. Epub 2017 Dec 18.
5
Quality of online information on breast cancer treatment options.乳腺癌治疗方案的在线信息质量。
Breast. 2018 Feb;37:6-12. doi: 10.1016/j.breast.2017.10.004. Epub 2017 Oct 15.
6
The complexities of fibromyalgia and its comorbidities.纤维肌痛及其共病的复杂性。
Curr Opin Rheumatol. 2018 Jan;30(1):94-100. doi: 10.1097/BOR.0000000000000464.
7
One year in review 2017: fibromyalgia.2017年度回顾:纤维肌痛
Clin Exp Rheumatol. 2017 May-Jun;35 Suppl 105(3):6-12. Epub 2017 Jun 28.
8
Evidenced-Based Guidelines on the Treatment of Fibromyalgia Patients: Are They Consistent and If Not, Why Not? Have Effective Psychological Treatments Been Overlooked?纤维肌痛患者治疗的循证指南:它们是否一致?若不一致,原因何在?有效的心理治疗是否被忽视了?
J Pain. 2017 Jul;18(7):747-756. doi: 10.1016/j.jpain.2016.12.006. Epub 2016 Dec 27.
9
2016 Revisions to the 2010/2011 fibromyalgia diagnostic criteria.2016年对2010/2011年纤维肌痛诊断标准的修订。
Semin Arthritis Rheum. 2016 Dec;46(3):319-329. doi: 10.1016/j.semarthrit.2016.08.012. Epub 2016 Aug 30.
10
EULAR revised recommendations for the management of fibromyalgia.EULAR 修订的纤维肌痛管理建议。
Ann Rheum Dis. 2017 Feb;76(2):318-328. doi: 10.1136/annrheumdis-2016-209724. Epub 2016 Jul 4.