• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

足底筋膜炎和跟骨骨刺的在线信息的质量和可读性。

Quality and readability of online information on plantar fasciitis and calcaneal spur.

机构信息

Department of Public Health, Faculty of Medicine, Kahramanmaras Sutcu Imam University, Kahramanmaras, Turkey.

Department of Orthopedics and Traumatology, Bulancak State Hospital, Giresun, Turkey.

出版信息

Rheumatol Int. 2022 Nov;42(11):1965-1972. doi: 10.1007/s00296-022-05165-6. Epub 2022 Jun 28.

DOI:10.1007/s00296-022-05165-6
PMID:35763090
Abstract

Plantar fasciitis and calcaneal spur are common causes of heel pain in the community. People use the Internet to obtain medical information about diseases. We reviewed Internet information sources on plantar fasciitis and calcaneal spur for quality and readability. The first 50 websites for each search term ("calcaneal spur", "heel spur", and "plantar fasciitis") were scanned on www.google.com . Six different valid tools were used for information quality and readability assessment. We searched for HONCode (Health On the Net Foundation Code) stamps on included websites. The total mean points for DISCERN were 50.52 ± 14.62, and the total mean points for JAMA (Journal of the American Medical Association) were 2.42 ± 1.26. In total, 25.72% of 97 websites had HONCode stamps. The average scores for the readability indicators were calculated to be Flesch-Kincaid Grade Level (FKGL): 7.27 ± 1.71, Gunning Fog: 8.46 ± 2.17, Simple Measure of Gobbledygook (SMOG): 6.89 ± 1.24, and Coleman Liau Index: 15.56 ± 1.85. In our study, when the website resources were examined, there were profit websites the most and website quality and readability were moderate level. A significant proportion of the websites have a financial bias and provide low-quality information. A mechanism for monitoring the quality and readability of online information must be established and managed systematically.

摘要

足底筋膜炎和跟骨骨刺是社区中常见的足跟痛原因。人们使用互联网获取有关疾病的医学信息。我们审查了互联网上关于足底筋膜炎和跟骨骨刺的信息来源,以评估其质量和可读性。对于每个搜索词(“跟骨骨刺”、“足跟骨刺”和“足底筋膜炎”),我们在 www.google.com 上扫描了前 50 个网站。使用六种不同的有效工具评估信息质量和可读性。我们在包含的网站上搜索 HONCode(健康在线基金会代码)印章。DISCERN 的总平均得分为 50.52±14.62,JAMA(美国医学会杂志)的总平均得分为 2.42±1.26。总共有 97 个网站中的 25.72% 有 HONCode 印章。计算了可读性指标的平均得分,结果为 Flesch-Kincaid 年级水平(FKGL):7.27±1.71,Gunning Fog:8.46±2.17,简单测量杂乱度(SMOG):6.89±1.24,Coleman Liau 指数:15.56±1.85。在我们的研究中,当检查网站资源时,盈利网站最多,网站质量和可读性处于中等水平。相当一部分网站存在财务偏见,并提供低质量的信息。必须建立和系统地管理一种监测在线信息质量和可读性的机制。

相似文献

1
Quality and readability of online information on plantar fasciitis and calcaneal spur.足底筋膜炎和跟骨骨刺的在线信息的质量和可读性。
Rheumatol Int. 2022 Nov;42(11):1965-1972. doi: 10.1007/s00296-022-05165-6. Epub 2022 Jun 28.
2
Quality and Readability of Web-based Arabic Health Information on Denture Hygiene: An Infodemiology Study.基于网络的阿拉伯语假牙卫生健康信息的质量与可读性:一项信息流行病学研究。
J Contemp Dent Pract. 2020 Sep 1;21(9):956-960.
3
Transjugular intrahepatic portosystemic shunt (TIPS) procedure: an assessment of the quality and readability of online information.经颈静脉肝内门体分流术(TIPS)操作:在线信息质量和可读性的评估。
BMC Med Inform Decis Mak. 2021 May 5;21(1):149. doi: 10.1186/s12911-021-01513-x.
4
Quality and readability of web-based information on dental caries in Arabic: an infodemiological study.基于网络的阿拉伯文龋齿信息的质量和可读性:一项信息流行病学研究。
BMC Oral Health. 2023 Oct 25;23(1):797. doi: 10.1186/s12903-023-03547-1.
5
Assessing parental comprehension of online resources on childhood pain.评估父母对儿童疼痛在线资源的理解程度。
Medicine (Baltimore). 2024 Jun 21;103(25):e38569. doi: 10.1097/MD.0000000000038569.
6
Online Patient Information for Hysterectomies: A Systematic Environmental Scan of Quality and Readability.在线子宫切除术患者信息:系统环境扫描质量和可读性。
J Obstet Gynaecol Can. 2022 Aug;44(8):870-876. doi: 10.1016/j.jogc.2022.03.015. Epub 2022 Apr 26.
7
A Comprehensive Evaluation of the Quality, Readability, and Technical Quality of Online Information on Glaucoma.青光眼在线信息的质量、可读性及技术质量综合评估
Ophthalmol Glaucoma. 2023 Jan-Feb;6(1):93-99. doi: 10.1016/j.ogla.2022.07.007. Epub 2022 Aug 6.
8
Quality, Reliability, and Readability of Online Information on Idiopathic Intracranial Hypertension.特发性颅内高压在线信息的质量、可靠性和可读性
J Neuroophthalmol. 2025 Mar 1;45(1):17-22. doi: 10.1097/WNO.0000000000002130. Epub 2024 Mar 25.
9
Assessing the Quality and Readability of Online Resources for Plantar Fasciitis.评估足底筋膜炎在线资源的质量和可读性。
J Foot Ankle Surg. 2021 Nov-Dec;60(6):1175-1178. doi: 10.1053/j.jfas.2021.02.014. Epub 2021 May 10.
10
Quality, Reliability, Technical Quality, and Readability of Google Online Information on Childhood Glaucoma.谷歌在线儿童青光眼信息的质量、可靠性、技术质量和可读性。
J Pediatr Ophthalmol Strabismus. 2024 May-Jun;61(3):198-203. doi: 10.3928/01913913-20231114-01. Epub 2023 Dec 19.

引用本文的文献

1
Comparison of Short-Term efficacy between medial and lateral dual incision approach and medial dual incision approach for endoscopic spur resection combined with plantar fascia release in the treatment of heel pain syndrome.内镜下骨刺切除术联合足底筋膜松解术治疗足跟痛综合征时内侧与外侧双切口入路及内侧双切口入路的短期疗效比较
BMC Surg. 2025 Aug 4;25(1):337. doi: 10.1186/s12893-025-03111-4.
2
MedReadMe: A Systematic Study for Fine-grained Sentence Readability in Medical Domain.MedReadMe:医学领域细粒度句子可读性的系统研究。
Proc Conf Empir Methods Nat Lang Process. 2024 Nov;2024:17293-17319. doi: 10.18653/v1/2024.emnlp-main.958.
3

本文引用的文献

1
Brugada Syndrome Misdiagnosed As Acute Myocardial Infarction: A Case Report.误诊为急性心肌梗死的 Brugada 综合征:一例报告
Cureus. 2022 Jul 18;14(7):e26998. doi: 10.7759/cureus.26998. eCollection 2022 Jul.
2
Evaluating the Quality and Readability of Online Resources on Unspecified Kidney Donation.评估关于未指定肾脏捐赠的在线资源的质量和可读性。
Transplant Proc. 2022 Apr;54(3):582-586. doi: 10.1016/j.transproceed.2021.12.047. Epub 2022 Mar 17.
3
Quality of web-based information on attention deficit hyperactivity disorder.
Evaluating the quality of TikTok videos on coronary artery disease using various scales to examine correlations with video characteristics and high-quality content.
使用各种量表评估TikTok上关于冠状动脉疾病的视频质量,以检验与视频特征和高质量内容的相关性。
Sci Rep. 2025 Mar 17;15(1):9189. doi: 10.1038/s41598-025-93986-3.
4
Trustworthiness, Value, Danger, and Readability of ChatGPT-Generated Responses to Health Questions Related to Pulmonary Arterial Hypertension.ChatGPT对肺动脉高压相关健康问题的回答的可信度、价值、风险及可读性
Cureus. 2024 Oct 14;16(10):e71472. doi: 10.7759/cureus.71472. eCollection 2024 Oct.
5
Assessment of the Quality and Readability of Online Resources on Corneal Transplantation.角膜移植在线资源的质量与可读性评估
Cureus. 2024 Oct 4;16(10):e70819. doi: 10.7759/cureus.70819. eCollection 2024 Oct.
6
Is Information About Musculoskeletal Malignancies From Large Language Models or Web Resources at a Suitable Reading Level for Patients?来自大语言模型或网络资源的关于肌肉骨骼恶性肿瘤的信息对患者来说是否处于合适的阅读水平?
Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2025 Feb 1;483(2):306-315. doi: 10.1097/CORR.0000000000003263. Epub 2024 Sep 25.
7
Online Patient Education Materials on Iron Deficiency Anemia Are Too Difficult to Read and Low Quality: A Readability and Quality Analysis.关于缺铁性贫血的在线患者教育材料阅读难度太大且质量低下:一项可读性与质量分析。
Cureus. 2023 Oct 12;15(10):e46902. doi: 10.7759/cureus.46902. eCollection 2023 Oct.
8
From quality to clarity: evaluating the effectiveness of online ınformation related to septic arthritis.从质量到清晰度:评估与脓毒性关节炎相关的在线信息的有效性。
J Orthop Surg Res. 2023 Sep 15;18(1):689. doi: 10.1186/s13018-023-04181-x.
关于注意力缺陷多动障碍的网络信息质量。
Asian J Psychiatr. 2022 May;71:103071. doi: 10.1016/j.ajp.2022.103071. Epub 2022 Mar 12.
4
Dupuytren's Contracture: The Readability of Online Information.杜普伊特伦挛缩症:在线信息的可读性
J Patient Exp. 2021 Oct 27;8:23743735211056431. doi: 10.1177/23743735211056431. eCollection 2021.
5
YouTube as a source of information on COVID-19 vaccination in rheumatic diseases.YouTube 作为风湿性疾病 COVID-19 疫苗接种信息的来源。
Rheumatol Int. 2021 Dec;41(12):2109-2115. doi: 10.1007/s00296-021-05010-2. Epub 2021 Sep 25.
6
Readability of Online Materials Related to Vocal Cord Leukoplakia.与声带白斑相关的在线材料的可读性
OTO Open. 2021 Aug 9;5(3):2473974X211032644. doi: 10.1177/2473974X211032644. eCollection 2021 Jul-Sep.
7
Information on the Internet about clear aligner treatment-an assessment of content, quality, and readability.互联网上有关透明牙套治疗的信息——对内容、质量和可读性的评估。
J Orofac Orthop. 2022 Oct;83(Suppl 1):1-12. doi: 10.1007/s00056-021-00331-0. Epub 2021 Jul 16.
8
Readability of Patient Education Materials From High-Impact Medical Journals: A 20-Year Analysis.高影响力医学期刊中患者教育材料的可读性:一项为期20年的分析。
J Patient Exp. 2021 Mar 3;8:2374373521998847. doi: 10.1177/2374373521998847. eCollection 2021.
9
Social media platforms: a primer for researchers.社交媒体平台:研究人员入门指南。
Reumatologia. 2021;59(2):68-72. doi: 10.5114/reum.2021.102707. Epub 2021 Jan 16.
10
The Relationship of Rapid Eye Movement Sleep Behavior Disorder and Freezing of Gait in Parkinson's Disease.帕金森病中快速眼动睡眠行为障碍与冻结步态的关系。
Cureus. 2020 Dec 30;12(12):e12385. doi: 10.7759/cureus.12385.