• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

分子生物标志物和组织学参数对转移性结直肠癌患者一线系统治疗的生存和反应有影响。

Molecular biomarkers and histological parameters impact on survival and response to first- line systemic therapy of metastatic colorectal cancer patients.

机构信息

Department of Medical Oncology, Institute of Oncology Ljubljana, Ljubljana, Slovenia.

出版信息

Radiol Oncol. 2019 Mar 3;53(1):85-95. doi: 10.2478/raon-2019-0013.

DOI:10.2478/raon-2019-0013
PMID:30840593
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC6411021/
Abstract

Background Histological parameters of primary tumour and nodal metastases are prognostic factors for survival of operable colorectal (CRC) patients, but not predictive for response rate of systemic therapy. KRAS mutations in codons 12 and 13 were first recognized as a predictive factor for resistance to anti-EGFR monoclonal antibodies. Not all patients with wild-type KRAS (wtKRAS) respond to anti-EGFR antibody treatment. Additional mechanisms of resistance may activate mutations of the other main EGFR effectors pathway, such as other mutations in RAS gene, mutations in P13K and PTEN expression. Patients and methods In the prospective study prognostic and predictive impact of histological parameters of primary tumour, KRAS and BRAF mutations on overall survival (OS) and objective response (OR) rate of metastatic CRC (mCRC) patients treated with 1st line systemic therapy were analysed. We additionally retrospectively analysed other mutations in RAS genes and their impact on survival and time to progression. Results From November 2010 to December 2012, we enrolled 154 patients in the study, 95 men and 59 women. Mutations in KRAS gene and V600E BRAF gene were found in 42% and in 3% of patients, respectively. Median OS of the patients with T1, T2 and T3 tumour was 65.4 months (95% CI, 55.7-75.6) while in patients with T4 tumour, lymphangiosis, vascular and perineural invasion it has not been reached yet. Median OS of the patients with G1, G2 and G3 of tumour differentiation was 65.6 (95% CI, 53.7-77.5) and 25.3 months (95% CI, 16.6-34.1), respectively. Median OS of the patients with stage N0, N1 and N2 was 65.6 (95% CI, 56.4-74.8) and 58.0 months (95% CI, 21.9-94.2), respectively. Median OS of wtKRAS and mutated KRAS patients was 56.5 (95% CI, 48.2-64.9) and 58 months (95% CI, 52.6-63.4), respectively. Median OS of mutated codon 12 and codon 13 patients was 57 (95% CI, 50.9-64.4) and 44 months (95% CI, 40.1-48.4), respectively. Median OS of wtBRAF and of mutated BRAF patients was 59.2 (95% CI, 52.5-65.9) and 27.6 months (95% CI, 12.6-42.5), respectively. wtKRAS significantly affected the response to the first systemic therapy (p = 0.028), while other parameters did not affected it, p= 0.07. In 14 patients (17%), additional mutations in NRAS gene, codon 61 and codon 146 were found. Median OS of wtNRAS, codon 61 and 146 patients was 67.1 months (50.3-67.6) while median OS of mutated NRAS patients has not been reached yet (p = 0.072). Median time to progression of wtNRAS, codon 61 and 146 patients was 11.7 months (10.4-14.5) while median time to progression of mutated NRAS patients was 7.9 months (6.1-11.0), (p = 0.025). Conclusions Mutated BRAF, N2 and G3 of primary tumour were poor prognostic factors for OS in mCRC patients. wtKRAS significantly affected the response to the first line systemic therapy. Histological parameters included in the analysis and mutated BRAF did not affect significantly the efficacy of 1st line systemic therapy in mCRC patients.

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/9367/6411021/7ca2d9e8b2bd/raon-53-085-g007.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/9367/6411021/3b3520b948d4/raon-53-085-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/9367/6411021/9314d94bfab1/raon-53-085-g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/9367/6411021/24c24bf06e94/raon-53-085-g003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/9367/6411021/e1f4e2167c40/raon-53-085-g004.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/9367/6411021/5d4fc2decdd7/raon-53-085-g005.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/9367/6411021/e9359fe9b877/raon-53-085-g006.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/9367/6411021/7ca2d9e8b2bd/raon-53-085-g007.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/9367/6411021/3b3520b948d4/raon-53-085-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/9367/6411021/9314d94bfab1/raon-53-085-g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/9367/6411021/24c24bf06e94/raon-53-085-g003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/9367/6411021/e1f4e2167c40/raon-53-085-g004.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/9367/6411021/5d4fc2decdd7/raon-53-085-g005.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/9367/6411021/e9359fe9b877/raon-53-085-g006.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/9367/6411021/7ca2d9e8b2bd/raon-53-085-g007.jpg
摘要

背景

原发性肿瘤和淋巴结转移的组织学参数是可手术结直肠癌(CRC)患者生存的预后因素,但不是全身治疗反应率的预测因素。KRAS 密码子 12 和 13 的突变首先被认为是抗 EGFR 单克隆抗体耐药的预测因素。并非所有 KRAS 野生型(wtKRAS)的患者均对抗 EGFR 抗体治疗有反应。其他耐药机制可能会激活其他主要 EGFR 效应子通路的突变,例如 RAS 基因中的其他突变、PI3K 和 PTEN 表达的突变。

患者和方法

在这项前瞻性研究中,分析了原发性肿瘤、KRAS 和 BRAF 突变的组织学参数、对转移性 CRC(mCRC)患者一线系统治疗的总生存(OS)和客观缓解(OR)率的预后和预测影响。我们还回顾性分析了 RAS 基因的其他突变及其对生存和无进展时间的影响。

结果

从 2010 年 11 月至 2012 年 12 月,我们招募了 154 名患者参加这项研究,其中 95 名男性,59 名女性。KRAS 基因和 V600E BRAF 基因的突变分别在 42%和 3%的患者中发现。T1、T2 和 T3 肿瘤患者的中位 OS 为 65.4 个月(95%CI,55.7-75.6),而 T4 肿瘤、淋巴管浸润、血管浸润和神经周围浸润的患者尚未达到。G1、G2 和 G3 肿瘤分化患者的中位 OS 分别为 65.6(95%CI,53.7-77.5)和 25.3 个月(95%CI,16.6-34.1)。N0、N1 和 N2 期患者的中位 OS 分别为 65.6(95%CI,56.4-74.8)和 58.0 个月(95%CI,21.9-94.2)。wtKRAS 和突变 KRAS 患者的中位 OS 分别为 56.5(95%CI,48.2-64.9)和 58 个月(95%CI,52.6-63.4)。突变密码子 12 和密码子 13 患者的中位 OS 分别为 57(95%CI,50.9-64.4)和 44 个月(95%CI,40.1-48.4)。wtBRAF 和突变 BRAF 患者的中位 OS 分别为 59.2(95%CI,52.5-65.9)和 27.6 个月(95%CI,12.6-42.5)。wtKRAS 显著影响一线系统治疗的反应(p = 0.028),而其他参数则没有影响(p = 0.07)。在 14 名患者(17%)中发现了 NRAS 基因、密码子 61 和 146 的额外突变。wtNRAS、密码子 61 和 146 患者的中位 OS 为 67.1 个月(50.3-67.6),而突变 NRAS 患者的中位 OS 尚未达到(p = 0.072)。wtNRAS、密码子 61 和 146 患者的中位无进展时间为 11.7 个月(10.4-14.5),而突变 NRAS 患者的中位无进展时间为 7.9 个月(6.1-11.0)(p = 0.025)。

结论

BRAF 突变、N2 和 G3 是 mCRC 患者 OS 的不良预后因素。wtKRAS 显著影响一线系统治疗的反应。分析中包含的组织学参数和突变 BRAF 并未显著影响 mCRC 患者一线系统治疗的疗效。

相似文献

1
Molecular biomarkers and histological parameters impact on survival and response to first- line systemic therapy of metastatic colorectal cancer patients.分子生物标志物和组织学参数对转移性结直肠癌患者一线系统治疗的生存和反应有影响。
Radiol Oncol. 2019 Mar 3;53(1):85-95. doi: 10.2478/raon-2019-0013.
2
Biomarkers of benefit from cetuximab-based therapy in metastatic colorectal cancer: interaction of EGFR ligand expression with RAS/RAF, PIK3CA genotypes.表皮生长因子受体(EGFR)配体表达与 RAS/RAF、PIK3CA 基因型与西妥昔单抗为基础的治疗转移性结直肠癌获益的相关性:生物标志物。
BMC Cancer. 2013 Feb 2;13:49. doi: 10.1186/1471-2407-13-49.
3
Effects of KRAS, BRAF, NRAS, and PIK3CA mutations on the efficacy of cetuximab plus chemotherapy in chemotherapy-refractory metastatic colorectal cancer: a retrospective consortium analysis.KRAS、BRAF、NRAS 和 PIK3CA 基因突变对西妥昔单抗联合化疗治疗化疗耐药转移性结直肠癌疗效的影响:一项回顾性联盟分析。
Lancet Oncol. 2010 Aug;11(8):753-62. doi: 10.1016/S1470-2045(10)70130-3. Epub 2010 Jul 8.
4
BRAF V600E mutation and KRAS codon 13 mutations predict poor survival in Chinese colorectal cancer patients.BRAF V600E突变和KRAS密码子13突变预示中国结直肠癌患者的生存期较差。
BMC Cancer. 2014 Nov 3;14:802. doi: 10.1186/1471-2407-14-802.
5
KRAS codon 61, 146 and BRAF mutations predict resistance to cetuximab plus irinotecan in KRAS codon 12 and 13 wild-type metastatic colorectal cancer.KRAS密码子61、146以及BRAF突变预示着KRAS密码子12和13野生型转移性结直肠癌患者对西妥昔单抗联合伊立替康耐药。
Br J Cancer. 2009 Aug 18;101(4):715-21. doi: 10.1038/sj.bjc.6605177. Epub 2009 Jul 14.
6
Overall Survival, BRAF, RAS, and MSI Status in Patients Who Underwent Cetuximab After Refractory Chemotherapy for Metastatic Colorectal Cancer.接受西妥昔单抗治疗后难治性转移性结直肠癌患者的总生存期、BRAF、RAS 和 MSI 状态。
J Gastrointest Cancer. 2024 Mar;55(1):344-354. doi: 10.1007/s12029-023-00964-x. Epub 2023 Aug 23.
7
Recommendations from the EGAPP Working Group: can testing of tumor tissue for mutations in EGFR pathway downstream effector genes in patients with metastatic colorectal cancer improve health outcomes by guiding decisions regarding anti-EGFR therapy?EGAPP 工作组的建议:在转移性结直肠癌患者中检测 EGFR 通路下游效应基因的突变,能否通过指导抗 EGFR 治疗决策来改善健康结局?
Genet Med. 2013 Jul;15(7):517-27. doi: 10.1038/gim.2012.184. Epub 2013 Feb 21.
8
Fluoropyrimidine type, patient age, tumour sidedness and mutation status as determinants of benefit in patients with metastatic colorectal cancer treated with EGFR monoclonal antibodies: individual patient data pooled analysis of randomised trials from the ARCAD database.氟嘧啶类药物、患者年龄、肿瘤侧别和突变状态是接受 EGFR 单克隆抗体治疗的转移性结直肠癌患者获益的决定因素:来自 ARCAD 数据库的随机试验的个体患者数据汇总分析。
Br J Cancer. 2024 May;130(8):1269-1278. doi: 10.1038/s41416-024-02604-y. Epub 2024 Feb 24.
9
Prognostic and predictive biomarkers for anti-EGFR monoclonal antibody therapy in RAS wild-type metastatic colorectal cancer: a systematic review and meta-analysis.抗 EGFR 单克隆抗体治疗 RAS 野生型转移性结直肠癌的预后和预测生物标志物:系统评价和荟萃分析。
BMC Cancer. 2023 Nov 16;23(1):1117. doi: 10.1186/s12885-023-11600-z.
10
Role of NRAS mutations as prognostic and predictive markers in metastatic colorectal cancer.NRAS 基因突变作为转移性结直肠癌的预后和预测标志物的作用。
Int J Cancer. 2015 Jan 1;136(1):83-90. doi: 10.1002/ijc.28955. Epub 2014 May 28.

引用本文的文献

1
A panorama of colon cancer in the era of liquid biopsy.液体活检时代的结肠癌全景
J Liq Biopsy. 2024 Mar 13;4:100148. doi: 10.1016/j.jlb.2024.100148. eCollection 2024 Jun.
2
The five-year KRAS, NRAS and BRAF analysis results and treatment patterns in daily clinical practice in Slovenia in 1 line treatment of metastatic colorectal (mCRC) patients with wild-type tumour (wt) - a real- life data report 2013-2018.斯洛文尼亚一线治疗野生型肿瘤转移性结直肠癌(mCRC)患者的 5 年 KRAS、NRAS 和 BRAF 分析结果和日常临床实践中的治疗模式 - 真实数据报告 2013-2018.
Radiol Oncol. 2023 Mar 22;57(1):103-110. doi: 10.2478/raon-2023-0014. eCollection 2023 Mar 1.
3

本文引用的文献

1
High concordance rate of KRAS/BRAF mutations and MSI-H between primary colorectal cancer and corresponding metastases.原发性结直肠癌与相应转移灶之间KRAS/BRAF突变及微卫星高度不稳定(MSI-H)的一致性率较高。
Oncol Rep. 2017 Feb;37(2):785-792. doi: 10.3892/or.2016.5323. Epub 2016 Dec 15.
2
ESMO consensus guidelines for the management of patients with metastatic colorectal cancer.ESMO 共识指南:转移性结直肠癌患者的管理。
Ann Oncol. 2016 Aug;27(8):1386-422. doi: 10.1093/annonc/mdw235. Epub 2016 Jul 5.
3
Maintenance strategy in metastatic colorectal cancer: A systematic review.
A146 Mutations Are Associated With Distinct Clinical Behavior in Patients With Colorectal Liver Metastases.
A146 突变与结直肠癌肝转移患者的不同临床行为相关。
JCO Precis Oncol. 2021 Nov 17;5. doi: 10.1200/PO.21.00223. eCollection 2021.
4
Consensus molecular subtypes (CMS) in metastatic colorectal cancer - personalized medicine decision.转移性结直肠癌的共识分子亚型(CMS)- 个性化医学决策。
Radiol Oncol. 2020 May 28;54(3):272-277. doi: 10.2478/raon-2020-0031.
5
Prognostic and clinicopathological significance of long non-coding RNA UCA1 in colorectal cancer: Results from a meta-analysis.长链非编码RNA UCA1在结直肠癌中的预后及临床病理意义:一项荟萃分析的结果
Medicine (Baltimore). 2019 Nov;98(48):e18031. doi: 10.1097/MD.0000000000018031.
转移性结直肠癌的维持治疗策略:系统评价。
Cancer Treat Rev. 2016 Jan;42:82-90. doi: 10.1016/j.ctrv.2015.10.012. Epub 2015 Nov 10.
4
First-line anti-EGFR monoclonal antibodies in panRAS wild-type metastatic colorectal cancer: A systematic review and meta-analysis.一线抗表皮生长因子受体单克隆抗体用于全RAS野生型转移性结直肠癌:一项系统评价和荟萃分析。
Crit Rev Oncol Hematol. 2015 Oct;96(1):156-66. doi: 10.1016/j.critrevonc.2015.05.016. Epub 2015 Jun 5.
5
PD-1 Blockade in Tumors with Mismatch-Repair Deficiency.错配修复缺陷肿瘤中的程序性死亡受体-1阻断
N Engl J Med. 2015 Jun 25;372(26):2509-20. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa1500596. Epub 2015 May 30.
6
Mismatch repair status and BRAF mutation status in metastatic colorectal cancer patients: a pooled analysis of the CAIRO, CAIRO2, COIN, and FOCUS studies.转移性结直肠癌患者的错配修复状态和BRAF突变状态:CAIRO、CAIRO2、COIN和FOCUS研究的汇总分析
Clin Cancer Res. 2014 Oct 15;20(20):5322-30. doi: 10.1158/1078-0432.CCR-14-0332. Epub 2014 Aug 19.
7
Extended RAS mutations and anti-EGFR monoclonal antibody survival benefit in metastatic colorectal cancer: a meta-analysis of randomized, controlled trials.延长 RAS 突变和抗 EGFR 单克隆抗体在转移性结直肠癌中的生存获益:随机对照试验的荟萃分析。
Ann Oncol. 2015 Jan;26(1):13-21. doi: 10.1093/annonc/mdu378. Epub 2014 Aug 12.
8
Gastro-intestinal toxicity of chemotherapeutics in colorectal cancer: the role of inflammation.化疗药物在结直肠癌中的胃肠道毒性:炎症的作用。
World J Gastroenterol. 2014 Apr 14;20(14):3751-61. doi: 10.3748/wjg.v20.i14.3751.
9
The predictive value of KRAS, NRAS, BRAF, PIK3CA and PTEN for anti-EGFR treatment in metastatic colorectal cancer: A systematic review and meta-analysis.KRAS、NRAS、BRAF、PIK3CA和PTEN对转移性结直肠癌抗表皮生长因子受体治疗的预测价值:一项系统评价和荟萃分析。
Acta Oncol. 2014 Jul;53(7):852-64. doi: 10.3109/0284186X.2014.895036. Epub 2014 Mar 25.
10
Review of histopathological and molecular prognostic features in colorectal cancer.结直肠癌的组织病理学和分子预后特征综述。
Cancers (Basel). 2011 Jun 23;3(2):2767-810. doi: 10.3390/cancers3022767.