• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

基于临床数据的脓毒症休克数学模型

Mathematical modeling of septic shock based on clinical data.

作者信息

Yamanaka Yukihiro, Uchida Kenko, Akashi Momoka, Watanabe Yuta, Yaguchi Arino, Shimamoto Shuji, Shimoda Shingo, Yamada Hitoshi, Yamashita Masashi, Kimura Hidenori

机构信息

Waseda University, 3-4-1 Ohkubo, Shinjuku-ku, Tokyo, Japan.

Tokyo Women's Medical University, Kawada-cho, Shinjuku-ku, Tokyo, Japan.

出版信息

Theor Biol Med Model. 2019 Mar 6;16(1):5. doi: 10.1186/s12976-019-0101-9.

DOI:10.1186/s12976-019-0101-9
PMID:30841902
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC6404291/
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Mathematical models of diseases may provide a unified approach for establishing effective treatment strategies based on fundamental pathophysiology. However, models that are useful for clinical practice must overcome the massive complexity of human physiology and the diversity of patients' environmental conditions. With the aim of modeling a complex disease, we choose sepsis, which is highly complex, life-threatening systemic disease with high mortality. In particular, we focused on septic shock, a subset of sepsis in which underlying circulatory and cellular/metabolic abnormalities are profound enough to substantially increase mortality. Our model includes cardiovascular, immune, nervous system models and a pharmacological model as submodels and integrates them to create a sepsis model based on pathological facts.

RESULTS

Model validation was done in two steps. First, we established a model for a standard patient in order to confirm the validity of our approach in general aspects. For this, we checked the correspondence between the severity of infection defined in terms of pathogen growth rate and the ease of recovery defined in terms of the intensity of treatment required for recovery. The simulations for a standard patient showed good correspondence. We then applied the same simulations to a patient with heart failure as an underlying disease. The model showed that spontaneous recovery would not occur without treatment, even for a very mild infection. This is consistent with clinical experience. We next validated the model using clinical data of three sepsis patients. The model parameters were tuned for these patients based on the model for the standard patient used in the first part of the validation. In these cases, the simulations agreed well with clinical data. In fact, only a handful parameters need to be tuned for the simulations to match with the data.

CONCLUSIONS

We have constructed a model of septic shock and have shown that it can reproduce well the time courses of treatment and disease progression. Tuning of model parameters for each patient could be easily done. This study demonstrates the feasibility of disease models, suggesting the possibility of clinical use in the prediction of disease progression, decisions on the timing of drug dosages, and the estimation of time of infection.

摘要

背景

疾病的数学模型可为基于基本病理生理学建立有效的治疗策略提供统一方法。然而,对临床实践有用的模型必须克服人体生理学的巨大复杂性以及患者环境条件的多样性。为了对一种复杂疾病进行建模,我们选择了脓毒症,它是一种高度复杂、危及生命且死亡率高的全身性疾病。特别是,我们专注于感染性休克,它是脓毒症的一个子集,其潜在的循环和细胞/代谢异常严重到足以大幅增加死亡率。我们的模型包括心血管、免疫、神经系统模型以及一个药理学模型作为子模型,并将它们整合起来以创建一个基于病理事实的脓毒症模型。

结果

模型验证分两步进行。首先,我们为一名标准患者建立了一个模型,以确认我们的方法在一般方面的有效性。为此,我们检查了根据病原体生长率定义的感染严重程度与根据恢复所需治疗强度定义的恢复难易程度之间的对应关系。对标准患者的模拟显示出良好的对应关系。然后,我们将相同的模拟应用于一名患有心力衰竭基础疾病的患者。模型显示,即使是非常轻微的感染,如果不进行治疗也不会自发恢复。这与临床经验一致。接下来,我们使用三名脓毒症患者的临床数据对模型进行验证。基于验证第一部分中使用的标准患者模型,为这些患者调整了模型参数。在这些情况下,模拟结果与临床数据吻合良好。事实上,只需调整少数几个参数,模拟结果就能与数据匹配。

结论

我们构建了一个感染性休克模型,并表明它能够很好地再现治疗和疾病进展的时间进程。为每个患者调整模型参数很容易做到。这项研究证明了疾病模型的可行性,暗示了其在疾病进展预测、药物剂量时机决策以及感染时间估计方面临床应用的可能性。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/d773/6404291/24e3a595e1da/12976_2019_101_Fig16_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/d773/6404291/242ed8486a83/12976_2019_101_Fig1_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/d773/6404291/427d6fa0cb74/12976_2019_101_Fig2_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/d773/6404291/69d1cdebf55b/12976_2019_101_Fig3_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/d773/6404291/e3c7d80de047/12976_2019_101_Fig4_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/d773/6404291/9a99a79a491e/12976_2019_101_Fig5_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/d773/6404291/7fa2e3b7364a/12976_2019_101_Fig6_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/d773/6404291/afc3821c0ef5/12976_2019_101_Fig7_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/d773/6404291/23bfe19ba82c/12976_2019_101_Fig8_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/d773/6404291/ac9b78af323a/12976_2019_101_Fig9_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/d773/6404291/8614b1088426/12976_2019_101_Fig10_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/d773/6404291/4fa77340bdde/12976_2019_101_Fig11_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/d773/6404291/a8614463c1cc/12976_2019_101_Fig12_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/d773/6404291/0746ab7a69a8/12976_2019_101_Fig13_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/d773/6404291/7c72311a5420/12976_2019_101_Fig14_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/d773/6404291/899b89be9c3f/12976_2019_101_Fig15_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/d773/6404291/24e3a595e1da/12976_2019_101_Fig16_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/d773/6404291/242ed8486a83/12976_2019_101_Fig1_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/d773/6404291/427d6fa0cb74/12976_2019_101_Fig2_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/d773/6404291/69d1cdebf55b/12976_2019_101_Fig3_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/d773/6404291/e3c7d80de047/12976_2019_101_Fig4_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/d773/6404291/9a99a79a491e/12976_2019_101_Fig5_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/d773/6404291/7fa2e3b7364a/12976_2019_101_Fig6_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/d773/6404291/afc3821c0ef5/12976_2019_101_Fig7_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/d773/6404291/23bfe19ba82c/12976_2019_101_Fig8_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/d773/6404291/ac9b78af323a/12976_2019_101_Fig9_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/d773/6404291/8614b1088426/12976_2019_101_Fig10_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/d773/6404291/4fa77340bdde/12976_2019_101_Fig11_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/d773/6404291/a8614463c1cc/12976_2019_101_Fig12_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/d773/6404291/0746ab7a69a8/12976_2019_101_Fig13_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/d773/6404291/7c72311a5420/12976_2019_101_Fig14_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/d773/6404291/899b89be9c3f/12976_2019_101_Fig15_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/d773/6404291/24e3a595e1da/12976_2019_101_Fig16_HTML.jpg

相似文献

1
Mathematical modeling of septic shock based on clinical data.基于临床数据的脓毒症休克数学模型
Theor Biol Med Model. 2019 Mar 6;16(1):5. doi: 10.1186/s12976-019-0101-9.
2
The cardiopulmonary effects of vasopressin compared with norepinephrine in septic shock.血管加压素与去甲肾上腺素在感染性休克中的心肺效应比较。
Chest. 2012 Sep;142(3):593-605. doi: 10.1378/chest.11-2604.
3
The Third International Consensus Definitions for Sepsis and Septic Shock (Sepsis-3).《脓毒症及脓毒性休克第三次国际共识定义(脓毒症-3)》
JAMA. 2016 Feb 23;315(8):801-10. doi: 10.1001/jama.2016.0287.
4
Sepsis Care Pathway 2019.2019年脓毒症护理路径
Qatar Med J. 2019 Nov 7;2019(2):4. doi: 10.5339/qmj.2019.qccc.4. eCollection 2019.
5
Cardiovascular response to dobutamine stress predicts outcome in severe sepsis and septic shock.多巴酚丁胺负荷试验的心血管反应可预测严重脓毒症和脓毒性休克的预后。
Crit Care. 2008;12(2):R35. doi: 10.1186/cc6814. Epub 2008 Mar 4.
6
Norepinephrine increases cardiac preload and reduces preload dependency assessed by passive leg raising in septic shock patients.去甲肾上腺素增加脓毒性休克患者的心脏前负荷,并减少通过被动抬腿评估的前负荷依赖性。
Crit Care Med. 2011 Apr;39(4):689-94. doi: 10.1097/CCM.0b013e318206d2a3.
7
Developing a New Definition and Assessing New Clinical Criteria for Septic Shock: For the Third International Consensus Definitions for Sepsis and Septic Shock (Sepsis-3).制定脓毒性休克的新定义并评估新的临床标准:用于第三次脓毒症和脓毒性休克国际共识定义(Sepsis-3)。
JAMA. 2016 Feb 23;315(8):775-87. doi: 10.1001/jama.2016.0289.
8
Surviving Sepsis Campaign: international guidelines for management of severe sepsis and septic shock, 2012.拯救脓毒症运动:严重脓毒症和脓毒性休克管理国际指南,2012 年。
Intensive Care Med. 2013 Feb;39(2):165-228. doi: 10.1007/s00134-012-2769-8. Epub 2013 Jan 30.
9
Multi-complexity measures of heart rate variability and the effect of vasopressor titration: a prospective cohort study of patients with septic shock.心率变异性的多复杂性测量及血管升压药滴定的效果:一项针对感染性休克患者的前瞻性队列研究。
BMC Infect Dis. 2016 Oct 10;16(1):551. doi: 10.1186/s12879-016-1896-1.
10
Surviving Sepsis Campaign: international guidelines for management of severe sepsis and septic shock: 2008.拯救脓毒症运动:严重脓毒症和脓毒性休克管理国际指南:2008年版
Intensive Care Med. 2008 Jan;34(1):17-60. doi: 10.1007/s00134-007-0934-2. Epub 2007 Dec 4.

引用本文的文献

1
Investigating computational models for diagnosis and prognosis of sepsis based on clinical parameters: Opportunities, challenges, and future research directions.基于临床参数的脓毒症诊断和预后的计算模型研究:机遇、挑战及未来研究方向。
J Intensive Med. 2024 Jul 10;4(4):468-477. doi: 10.1016/j.jointm.2024.04.006. eCollection 2024 Oct.
2
Development of a predictive machine learning model for pathogen profiles in patients with secondary immunodeficiency.开发用于预测继发性免疫缺陷患者病原体谱的机器学习模型。
BMC Med Inform Decis Mak. 2024 Feb 13;24(1):48. doi: 10.1186/s12911-024-02447-w.
3
Predicting the neuro-cardio-haemodynamic outcomes of sepsis and its pharmacological interventions: Get to the future through numerical equations.

本文引用的文献

1
A mathematical model of type 1 diabetes involving leptin effects on glucose metabolism.一种涉及瘦素对葡萄糖代谢影响的 1 型糖尿病数学模型。
J Theor Biol. 2018 Nov 7;456:213-223. doi: 10.1016/j.jtbi.2018.08.008. Epub 2018 Aug 8.
2
A users' guide to the 2016 Surviving Sepsis Guidelines.《2016年拯救脓毒症指南用户指南》
Intensive Care Med. 2017 Mar;43(3):299-303. doi: 10.1007/s00134-017-4681-8. Epub 2017 Jan 18.
3
Broad defects in the energy metabolism of leukocytes underlie immunoparalysis in sepsis.严重脓毒症患者白细胞能量代谢存在广泛缺陷,导致免疫麻痹。
预测脓毒症的神经-心脏-血液动力学结局及其药物干预措施:通过数值方程通向未来。
J Physiol. 2021 Jun;599(11):2797-2799. doi: 10.1113/JP281661. Epub 2021 May 7.
4
Mathematical model of blood glucose dynamics by emulating the pathophysiology of glucose metabolism in type 2 diabetes mellitus.模拟 2 型糖尿病葡萄糖代谢病理生理学的血糖动力学数学模型。
Sci Rep. 2020 Jul 29;10(1):12697. doi: 10.1038/s41598-020-69629-0.
5
Should we wait or not? The preferable option for patients with stage IV oral cancer in COVID-19 pandemic.我们是否应该等待?COVID-19 大流行期间 IV 期口腔癌患者的优选方案。
Head Neck. 2020 Jun;42(6):1173-1178. doi: 10.1002/hed.26196. Epub 2020 Apr 28.
Nat Immunol. 2016 Apr;17(4):406-13. doi: 10.1038/ni.3398. Epub 2016 Mar 7.
4
The Third International Consensus Definitions for Sepsis and Septic Shock (Sepsis-3).《脓毒症及脓毒性休克第三次国际共识定义(脓毒症-3)》
JAMA. 2016 Feb 23;315(8):801-10. doi: 10.1001/jama.2016.0287.
5
Mathematical Model of Innate and Adaptive Immunity of Sepsis: A Modeling and Simulation Study of Infectious Disease.脓毒症先天性和适应性免疫的数学模型:传染病的建模与仿真研究
Biomed Res Int. 2015;2015:504259. doi: 10.1155/2015/504259. Epub 2015 Sep 8.
6
Sepsis and immune response.脓毒症与免疫反应。
World J Emerg Med. 2011;2(2):88-92.
7
Cardiac output response to norepinephrine in postoperative cardiac surgery patients: interpretation with venous return and cardiac function curves.术后心脏手术患者去甲肾上腺素的心输出量反应:用静脉回流和心功能曲线进行解释。
Crit Care Med. 2013 Jan;41(1):143-50. doi: 10.1097/CCM.0b013e318265ea64.
8
Dynamic modelling of protein and oxidative metabolisms simulates the pathogenesis of Parkinson's disease.动态建模蛋白质和氧化代谢模拟帕金森病的发病机制。
IET Syst Biol. 2012 Jun;6(3):65-72. doi: 10.1049/iet-syb.2011.0075.
9
Nationwide trends of severe sepsis in the 21st century (2000-2007).21 世纪(2000-2007 年)全国范围内严重脓毒症的流行趋势。
Chest. 2011 Nov;140(5):1223-1231. doi: 10.1378/chest.11-0352. Epub 2011 Aug 18.
10
Sepsis: Something old, something new, and a systems view.脓毒症:旧有认识、新的认识和系统观点。
J Crit Care. 2012 Jun;27(3):314.e1-11. doi: 10.1016/j.jcrc.2011.05.025. Epub 2011 Jul 27.