• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

[播散性脑脊髓炎的脑电图变化与脑磁共振断层扫描结果的比较]

[EEG changes in disseminated encephalomyelitis in comparison with the findings of cerebral magnetic resonance tomography].

作者信息

Bräu H, Baum K, Schörner W

出版信息

EEG EMG Z Elektroenzephalogr Elektromyogr Verwandte Geb. 1986 Mar;17(1):20-6.

PMID:3084200
Abstract

The electroencephalograms of 40 patients with acute symptoms of multiple sclerosis, 10 of whom presented with primary manifestation, were compared with the findings in cerebral nuclear magnetic resonance imaging. 32.5% of the patients EEGs showed abnormalities. Considering borderline findings the percentage of remarkable EEGs mounted to 60%. All of the patients presented periventricular lesions in NMR. In addition to the periventricular abnormalities between 1 and 26 district lesions per patient were found (mean = 6.5; Median = 5). In the patients group with five and more non-periventricular lesions, there were significantly more pathologic EEG-findings (p less than 0.05) than in the group with fewer lesions. Statistical correlations between EEG-abnormalities and the extent of functional deficit could not be substantiated. Neither could type and locality of EEG-changes be correlated to non-periventricular lesions in NMR.

摘要

对40例有急性多发性硬化症状的患者(其中10例为首发症状)的脑电图与脑核磁共振成像结果进行了比较。32.5%的患者脑电图显示异常。若将临界结果考虑在内,显著异常脑电图的比例达60%。所有患者在核磁共振成像中均表现为脑室周围病变。除脑室周围异常外,每位患者还发现1至26个区域病变(平均=6.5;中位数=5)。在有5个及以上非脑室周围病变的患者组中,病理性脑电图结果显著多于病变较少的组(p<0.05)。脑电图异常与功能缺损程度之间的统计相关性未得到证实。脑电图变化的类型和部位也均与核磁共振成像中的非脑室周围病变无关。

相似文献

1
[EEG changes in disseminated encephalomyelitis in comparison with the findings of cerebral magnetic resonance tomography].[播散性脑脊髓炎的脑电图变化与脑磁共振断层扫描结果的比较]
EEG EMG Z Elektroenzephalogr Elektromyogr Verwandte Geb. 1986 Mar;17(1):20-6.
2
[Initial manifestation of disseminated encephalomyelitis: MRT comparative study with established disseminated encephalomyelitis].[播散性脑脊髓炎的初始表现:与确诊的播散性脑脊髓炎的磁共振成像对比研究]
Nervenarzt. 1986 Aug;57(8):455-60.
3
[Cortical SEP of early and intermediate latency following stimulation of the median and tibial nerves in disseminated encephalomyelitis--relation to findings in cerebral nuclear magnetic resonance tomography].
EEG EMG Z Elektroenzephalogr Elektromyogr Verwandte Geb. 1986 Dec;17(4):201-8.
4
[Diagnostic value of magnetic resonance tomography in disseminated encephalomyelitis].[磁共振断层扫描在播散性脑脊髓炎中的诊断价值]
Nervenarzt. 1987 Mar;58(3):158-64.
5
Comparison of magnetic resonance imaging with somatosensory testing in MS suspects.对疑似多发性硬化症患者进行磁共振成像与体感测试的比较。
Muscle Nerve. 1987 Jun;10(5):385-90. doi: 10.1002/mus.880100502.
6
[The diagnostic value of nuclear magnetic resonance tomography, multimodal evoked potentials and cerebrospinal fluid examination in multiple sclerosis].[磁共振断层扫描、多模态诱发电位及脑脊液检查在多发性硬化症中的诊断价值]
Nervenarzt. 1993 Apr;64(4):226-32.
7
[Significance of magnetic resonance tomography in disseminated encephalomyelitis].[磁共振断层扫描在播散性脑脊髓炎中的意义]
Nervenarzt. 1985 Dec;56(12):666-72.
8
[Clinical picture of multiple sclerosis in the magnetic resonance tomogram].[磁共振断层扫描中多发性硬化症的临床图像]
Rofo. 1985 May;142(5):487-94. doi: 10.1055/s-2008-1052694.
9
[Multiple sclerosis. Clinical topodiagnosis in comparison with cerebral MRI findings].[多发性硬化症。与脑部磁共振成像结果对比的临床局部诊断]
Nervenarzt. 1994 Aug;65(8):542-8.
10
Characterization of tissue damage in multiple sclerosis by nuclear magnetic resonance.利用核磁共振对多发性硬化症中的组织损伤进行表征
Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci. 1999 Oct 29;354(1390):1675-86. doi: 10.1098/rstb.1999.0511.

引用本文的文献

1
Electroencephalographic vigilance dynamics in multiple sclerosis during an acute episode and after remission.急性发作期及缓解期多发性硬化症患者的脑电图警觉性动态变化
Eur Arch Psychiatry Neurol Sci. 1990;239(5):320-4. doi: 10.1007/BF01735058.