Rehabilitation Medicine, ErasmusMC, , 3000CA Rotterdam, The Netherlands.
J Rehabil Med. 2019 Mar 13;51(3):151-159. doi: 10.2340/16501977-2522.
To determine the effectiveness of health-care interventions promoting physical activity, which use objective feedback on physical activity delivered using wearable activity monitors as part of the intervention. Intervention groups are compared with control groups receiving usual care or interventions without objective feedback.
PubMed, EMBASE, MEDLINE and Cochrane Library were searched to identify randomized controlled trials.
Randomized controlled trials published after 2007 with (former) healthcare patients ≥ 21 years of age were included if physical activity was measured objectively using a wearable monitor for both feedback and outcome assessment. The main goal of included studies was promoting physical activity. Any concurrent strategies were related only to promoting physical activity.
Effect sizes were calculated using a fixed-effects model with standardized mean difference. Information on study characteristics and interventions strategies were extracted from study descriptions.
Fourteen studies met the inclusion criteria (total n = 1,902), and 2 studies were excluded from meta-analysis. The overall effect size was in favour of the intervention groups (0.34, 95% CI 0.23-0.44, p < 0.01). Study characteristics and intervention strategies varied widely.
Healthcare interventions using feedback on objectively monitored physical activity have a moderately positive effect on levels of physical activity. Further research is needed to determine which strategies are most effective to promote physical activity in healthcare programmes.
确定使用可穿戴活动监测器提供的体力活动客观反馈来促进体力活动的医疗保健干预措施的有效性,该反馈是干预措施的一部分。将干预组与接受常规护理或没有客观反馈的干预措施的对照组进行比较。
检索了 PubMed、EMBASE、MEDLINE 和 Cochrane Library,以确定随机对照试验。
如果使用可穿戴监测器对体力活动进行客观测量,同时用于反馈和结果评估,则纳入 2007 年后发表的、有(前)医疗保健患者(≥21 岁)的随机对照试验。纳入研究的主要目标是促进体力活动。任何并发策略都仅与促进体力活动有关。
使用固定效应模型和标准化均数差计算效应大小。从研究描述中提取了研究特征和干预策略的信息。
符合纳入标准的研究有 14 项(总计 n=1902),有 2 项研究被排除在荟萃分析之外。干预组的总体效果明显(0.34,95%CI 0.23-0.44,p<0.01)。研究特征和干预策略差异很大。
使用客观监测的体力活动反馈的医疗保健干预措施对体力活动水平有适度的积极影响。需要进一步研究确定哪些策略在医疗保健计划中最有效促进体力活动。