Department of Stomatology and maxillofacial surgery, School of Medicine, Université Libre de Bruxelles, CHU Saint-Pierre, Brussels, Belgium.
Department of Stomatology and maxillofacial surgery, School of Medicine, Université Libre de Bruxelles, CHU Saint-Pierre, Brussels, Belgium; Department of Otorhinolaryngology and Head and Neck Surgery, School of Medicine, Université Libre de Bruxelles, CHU Saint-Pierre, Brussels, Belgium.
Eur Ann Otorhinolaryngol Head Neck Dis. 2019 Jun;136(3S):S27-S33. doi: 10.1016/j.anorl.2019.01.001. Epub 2019 Mar 4.
Head and neck cancer (HNC) patients often experience malnutrition before and during treatment. Prophylactic gastrostomy has emerged as an efficient tool for ensuring adequate nutrition. However, there is no suitable algorithm able to identify patients at high risk of malnutrition. The aim of this study was to describe the nutritional management, to assess the impact of prophylactic gastrostomy, and to identify predictors of malnutrition.
This retrospective study included 152 patients treated with surgery, radiotherapy, or chemotherapy for HNC. The patients were classified according to their gastrostomy status (prophylactic or non-prophylactic). Nutritional, tumoral and treatment characteristics were reported. Clinical and nutritional outcomes were measured 6 weeks after the beginning of treatment. In order to describe the nutritional management and the impact of prophylactic gastrostomy on patients, univariate analysis was generated using chi-square test and Mann-Whitney test or Student's t-test. Logistic regression was performed to identify factors associated with malnutrition.
Forty-one patients received prophylactic gastrostomy whereas 111 patients had no nutritional support. Prophylactic gastrostomy placement was associated with a lower initial body mass index, with severe malnutrition, and with initial oral intake disorder. Patients who did not experienced prophylactic gastrostomy had much worse outcomes such as hospital readmissions (P=0.042), relative weight loss at 6 weeks (P<0.0001), dysphagia, severe malnutrition, and poor state of health (P=0.001). Our complication rates (4.9%) were lower than the usual range (5.9-9.3%) and no life-threatening complication was reported. Positive N status, oral intake disorder, concomitant radiochemotherapy, nasopharyngeal, and hypopharyngeal tumor site were significant predictive factors for malnutrition.
Prophylactic percutaneous endoscopic gastrostomy showed advantages in terms of hospital readmissions, relative weight loss at 6 weeks, dysphagia, severe malnutrition, and poor state of health. Tumoral, nutritional and treatment characteristics seem to be predictors for malnutrition. Hence, physicians should integrate these factors in their nutrition algorithm approach.
头颈部癌症(HNC)患者在治疗前和治疗期间经常出现营养不良。预防性胃造口术已成为确保充足营养的有效工具。然而,目前还没有合适的算法能够识别出高营养不良风险的患者。本研究的目的是描述营养管理,评估预防性胃造口术的影响,并确定营养不良的预测因素。
本回顾性研究纳入了 152 例接受手术、放疗或化疗治疗头颈部癌症的患者。根据胃造口术的情况(预防性或非预防性)对患者进行分类。报告了营养、肿瘤和治疗特征。在治疗开始后 6 周测量临床和营养结局。为了描述营养管理和预防性胃造口术对患者的影响,使用卡方检验和曼-惠特尼检验或学生 t 检验进行单变量分析。使用逻辑回归识别与营养不良相关的因素。
41 例患者接受了预防性胃造口术,111 例患者未接受营养支持。预防性胃造口术的放置与较低的初始体重指数、严重营养不良和初始口服摄入障碍有关。未接受预防性胃造口术的患者结局更差,如住院再入院(P=0.042)、6 周时相对体重减轻(P<0.0001)、吞咽困难、严重营养不良和健康状况差(P=0.001)。我们的并发症发生率(4.9%)低于通常范围(5.9-9.3%),没有报告危及生命的并发症。N 状态阳性、口服摄入障碍、同期放化疗、鼻咽和下咽肿瘤部位是营养不良的显著预测因素。
预防性经皮内镜胃造口术在住院再入院、6 周时相对体重减轻、吞咽困难、严重营养不良和健康状况差方面具有优势。肿瘤、营养和治疗特征似乎是营养不良的预测因素。因此,医生应将这些因素纳入其营养算法中。