Sturm College of Law, University of Denver, Denver, Colorado, USA.
Medical Ethics and Health Policy, University of Pennsylvania Perelman School of Medicine, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, USA.
J Med Ethics. 2019 May;45(5):318-322. doi: 10.1136/medethics-2018-105140. Epub 2019 Mar 7.
Recognising that offers of payment to research participants can serve various purposes-reimbursement, compensation and incentive-helps uncover differences between participants, which can justify differential payment of participants within the same study. Participants with different study-related expenses will need different amounts of reimbursement to be restored to their preparticipation financial baseline. Differential compensation can be acceptable when some research participants commit more time or assume greater burdens than others, or if inter-site differences affect the value of compensation. Finally, it may be permissible to offer differential incentive payments if necessary to advance the goals of a study. We encourage investigators and Institutional Review Boards to think about whether to offer payment, in what amounts and for what purpose, and also to consider whether differential payment can help promote the scientific and ethical goals of clinical research.
认识到向研究参与者提供报酬可以有多种目的——报销、补偿和激励——有助于揭示参与者之间的差异,这可以证明在同一研究中对参与者进行差异化支付是合理的。具有不同研究相关费用的参与者需要不同数量的报销才能恢复到他们参与研究前的财务基线。当某些研究参与者比其他参与者投入更多时间或承担更大负担,或者如果站点间差异影响补偿价值时,差异化补偿是可以接受的。最后,如果有必要推进研究目标,提供差异化激励性支付可能是允许的。我们鼓励研究人员和机构审查委员会考虑是否提供报酬、支付多少以及出于何种目的,还应考虑差异化支付是否有助于促进临床研究的科学和伦理目标。