Section of Orofacial Pain and Jaw Function, Department of Dentistry and Oral Health, Aarhus University, Aarhus, Denmark.
Scandinavian Centre for Orofacial Neurosciences (SCON), Aarhus, Denmark.
Eur J Pain. 2019 Aug;23(7):1297-1308. doi: 10.1002/ejp.1391. Epub 2019 Apr 1.
Somatosensory assessment within the orofacial region may be performed using highly standardized quantitative sensory testing (QST). However, the function of the C-tactile (CT) afferent, a nerve fibre linked to the perception of pleasant touch, is usually not evaluated. Furthermore, the perception of unpleasantness is also rarely assessed, a dimension not only limited to a painful experience. Therefore, the primary aim was to apply standardized QST stimuli as well as standardized pleasant stimuli and evaluate their potential capacity for evocation of perceived pain, pleasant and unpleasant sensations in the facial region.
Twenty-one female participants underwent QST as per the protocol derived from the German Research Network on Neuropathic Pain. For the first time, two modified protocols were used to investigate stimuli for perceived pleasantness and unpleasantness.
Thermal stimuli provided separate thresholds for each sensation. From certain mechanical stimuli (e.g., vibration), overlap between the perceived sensations of pleasantness and unpleasantness was identified. It was not possible to evoke only an unpleasant sensation without a painful contribution, and both these sensations increased significantly when utilizing an increasing pinprick force (p < 0.011). Between dynamic stimuli, the brush was rated as significantly more pleasant than the cotton wool tip (p = 0.015). A quadratic model provided the best fit for velocity against mean pleasantness ratings (R = 0.62 ± 0.08), supporting previous CT afferent literature to some extent.
Stimuli were generally not isolated to one sensation, highlighting the multidimensional construct of stimulus perception and the need for scales to capture this.
The battery of QST tests from the DFNS protocol has been modified to investigate pleasant and unpleasant sensations. This allows the evaluation of psychophysical properties across standardized dimensions to provide a thorough view of somatosensory function and to better understand the affective spectrum of somatosensory function.
口腔面部区域的躯体感觉评估可以使用高度标准化的定量感觉测试(QST)进行。然而,通常不会评估 C 触觉(CT)传入纤维的功能,该神经纤维与愉悦触摸的感知有关。此外,不愉快的感觉也很少被评估,这种感觉不仅限于疼痛体验。因此,主要目的是应用标准化 QST 刺激以及标准化愉悦刺激,并评估它们在面部区域诱发感知疼痛、愉悦和不愉快感觉的潜在能力。
21 名女性参与者按照德国神经病理性疼痛研究网络的方案进行 QST。首次使用两种改良方案来研究感知愉悦和不愉快的刺激。
热刺激为每种感觉提供了单独的阈值。从某些机械刺激(例如,振动)中,确定了愉悦和不愉快感觉之间的重叠。不可能在没有疼痛贡献的情况下仅诱发不愉快的感觉,并且当使用递增的刺痛力时,这两种感觉都会显著增加(p<0.011)。在动态刺激之间,刷子被评为比棉絮尖端明显更愉悦(p=0.015)。二次模型为速度与平均愉悦评分之间提供了最佳拟合(R=0.62±0.08),在某种程度上支持了之前的 CT 传入纤维文献。
刺激通常不会局限于一种感觉,突出了刺激感知的多维结构和需要捕捉这种结构的量表。
DFNS 方案中的 QST 测试电池已被修改,以研究愉悦和不愉快的感觉。这允许在标准化维度上评估心理物理特性,提供全面的躯体感觉功能视图,并更好地理解躯体感觉功能的情感谱。