Section of Orofacial Pain and Jaw Function, Department of Dentistry and Oral Health, Aarhus University, Aarhus, Denmark.
Scandinavian Centre for Orofacial Neurosciences (SCON), Aarhus, Denmark.
J Oral Rehabil. 2020 Jun;47(6):720-730. doi: 10.1111/joor.12963. Epub 2020 Apr 24.
Knowledge of pain modulation from oro-facial somatosensory stimuli with different valence (pleasant-unpleasant) is limited.
To investigate (a) the modulatory effects of painful, pleasant and unpleasant somatosensory stimuli on two models of experimental facial pain, (b) whether modulation could be changed by blocking peripheral nerves via application of a local anaesthetic, EMLA, or blocking endogenous opioid receptors via naltrexone and (c) whether pain ratings were significantly correlated with participant psychological profiles.
Thirty-eight healthy women received experimental facial skin burning pain or jaw myalgia for four randomised sessions on different days. The painful region was stimulated with mechanical or thermal painful, pleasant, unpleasant and control stimuli, with ratings recorded before and during stimulation. Sessions differed in pre-treatment: EMLA/naltrexone/placebo tablet/cream.
Significant effects of thermal or mechanical stimuli (P < .017), but not session (P > .102), were found on pain ratings for both models. In myalgia, painful cold resulted in a greater reduction in pain ratings than unpleasant cold, pleasant cold, control and pleasant warmth (P < .004). Decreases in pain ratings from painful, unpleasant and pleasant mechanical stimuli were greater than control (P < .002). In burning pain, painful cold resulted in a greater reduction in pain ratings than all but one of the other thermal stimuli (P < .033). The pleasant mechanical stimulus reduced pain ratings more than all other mechanical stimuli (P ≤ .003). There were no significant correlations between pain and psychometrics.
Valence-targeted thermal and mechanical stimuli modulated experimental myalgia and skin burning pain (P < .017). Partially blocking peripheral afferents or opioid receptors did not affect modulation.
对于来自口腔面部感觉刺激的不同效价(愉快-不愉快)的疼痛调节的知识有限。
研究(a)疼痛、愉快和不愉快的感觉刺激对两种实验性面部疼痛模型的调节作用,(b)通过应用局部麻醉剂 EMLA 阻断外周神经或通过纳曲酮阻断内源性阿片受体是否可以改变调节作用,以及(c)疼痛评分是否与参与者的心理特征显著相关。
38 名健康女性在不同的日子接受了四次随机的实验性面部皮肤灼痛或颌肌痛刺激。用机械或热痛觉、愉快、不愉快和对照刺激刺激疼痛区域,在刺激前后进行评分。刺激前的处理不同:EMLA/纳曲酮/安慰剂片剂/乳膏。
对于两种模型,热或机械刺激(P<.017),而不是刺激(P>.102),对疼痛评分有显著影响。在肌痛中,疼痛性冷刺激比不愉快性冷刺激、愉快性冷刺激、对照刺激和愉快性温暖刺激(P<.004)导致疼痛评分更大的降低。来自疼痛性、不愉快性和愉快性机械刺激的疼痛评分下降大于对照刺激(P<.002)。在灼痛中,疼痛性冷刺激导致疼痛评分的降低大于其他所有热刺激(P<.033)。愉快性机械刺激比其他所有机械刺激更能降低疼痛评分(P<.003)。疼痛与心理计量学之间没有显著相关性。
效价靶向的热和机械刺激调节了实验性肌痛和皮肤灼痛(P<.017)。部分阻断外周传入纤维或阿片受体并不影响调节作用。