Allen Philip A, Hughes Michelle L, Houston James R, Jardin Elliott, Mallik Peter, McLennan Conor, Delahanty Douglas L
a Department of Psychology , University of Akron , Akron , USA.
b Department of Psychology , Middle Tennessee State University , Murfreesboro , USA.
Exp Aging Res. 2019 Mar-Apr;45(2):97-119. doi: 10.1080/0361073X.2019.1586104. Epub 2019 Mar 8.
Background/Study Context: While most aging research on memory uses a retention interval of one hour or less, episodic consolidation takes longer (e.g., 6-24 hours for synaptic consolidation). In three experiments, we examined age differences in recall followed by recognition in which the retention interval was varied in younger and older adults.
In Experiment 1 (n = 24 for both age groups), zero-, 1- and 24-hour retention intervals were used for recall for all participants, and a 24-hour retention interval was used for recognition. In Experiment 2 (n = 24 for both age groups), just a 24-hour retention interval was used. In Experiment 3 (n = 20 for both age groups), a within-subjects design was used in which participants recalled one word list after one hour and again after 24 hours, and recalled another word list just after 24 hours (with recognition for both conditions after the 24-hour recall).
In Experiment 1, older adults recalled fewer words at both the 1- and 24-hour retention intervals, but the magnitude of the age difference did not differ. In Experiment 2 (just 24-hour retention interval), there were no age differences in recall. In Experiment 3, in the two-recall condition, older adults showed lower recall at both 1-hour and 24-hour retention intervals (but the magnitude of the age difference remained constant across retention interval). In the single-recall just 24-hour retention condition, there were no age differences. There were no age differences in recognition in any of the three experiments.
These results suggest that recall declines for a 24-hour retention interval relative to a zero or one-hour retention interval (Experiments 1 and 3) for both age groups. However, when the first recall attempt occurs after a 24-hour retention interval, there are no age differences. These replicated results suggest that older adults do not benefit as much as younger adults from pre-consolidated rehearsal, but that rehearsal-based age differences do not increase in magnitude from the last rehearsal to memory consolidation. Furthermore, (along with), the present results indicate that there are no age differences in recall when the first recall attempt occurs after a long retention interval - when memory consolidation is likely to have occurred before the first retrieval attempt.
背景/研究背景:虽然大多数关于记忆的衰老研究使用的保持间隔为一小时或更短,但情景记忆巩固需要更长时间(例如,突触巩固需要6 - 24小时)。在三项实验中,我们研究了年轻人和老年人在回忆后再认时的年龄差异,其中保持间隔有所不同。
在实验1中(两个年龄组各24人),所有参与者回忆的保持间隔为0小时、1小时和24小时,再认的保持间隔为24小时。在实验2中(两个年龄组各24人),仅使用24小时的保持间隔。在实验3中(两个年龄组各20人),采用了被试内设计,参与者在1小时后回忆一个单词列表,24小时后再次回忆,并且在24小时后回忆另一个单词列表(在24小时回忆后对两种情况都进行再认)。
在实验1中,老年人在1小时和24小时保持间隔时回忆出的单词都较少,但年龄差异的幅度没有不同。在实验2(仅24小时保持间隔)中,回忆方面没有年龄差异。在实验3中,在两次回忆条件下,老年人在1小时和24小时保持间隔时的回忆都较低(但年龄差异的幅度在整个保持间隔中保持不变)。在仅24小时保持间隔的单次回忆条件下,没有年龄差异。在三项实验中的任何一项中,再认方面都没有年龄差异。
这些结果表明,对于两个年龄组来说,相对于0小时或1小时的保持间隔,24小时保持间隔时的回忆会下降(实验1和3)。然而,当第一次回忆尝试在24小时保持间隔后进行时,没有年龄差异。这些重复的结果表明,老年人从预巩固排练中获得的益处不如年轻人多,但基于排练的年龄差异从最后一次排练到记忆巩固时幅度不会增加。此外,(连同)目前的结果表明,当第一次回忆尝试在长保持间隔后进行时,即当记忆巩固可能在第一次检索尝试之前就已发生时,回忆方面没有年龄差异。