Suppr超能文献

在空间或时间背景下构建自传体事件:两种靶向情节诱导技术的比较。

Constructing autobiographical events within a spatial or temporal context: a comparison of two targeted episodic induction techniques.

机构信息

a Department of Psychology , McGill University , Montreal , QC , Canada.

b Department of Psychology , Stanford University , Standford , CA , USA.

出版信息

Memory. 2019 Aug;27(7):881-893. doi: 10.1080/09658211.2019.1586952. Epub 2019 Mar 8.

Abstract

Recalling and imagining autobiographical experiences involves constructing event representations within spatiotemporal contexts. We tested whether generating autobiographical events within a primarily spatial (where the event occurred) or temporal (the sequence of actions that occurred) context affected how the associated mental representation was constructed. We leveraged the well-validated episodic specificity induction (ESI) technique, known to influence the use of episodic processes on subsequent tasks, to develop variants that selectively enhance spatial or temporal processing. We tested the effects of these inductions on the details used to describe past and future autobiographical events. We first replicated the standard ESI effect, showing that ESI enhances generating episodic details, particularly those that are perception-based, when describing autobiographical events (Experiment 1). We then directly compared the effects of the spatial and temporal inductions (Experiment 2 and 3). When describing autobiographical events, spatial induction enhanced generating episodic details, specifically perception-based details, compared to the control or temporal inductions. A greater proportion of the episodic details generated after the temporal induction were gist-based than after the spatial induction, but this proportion did not differ from a control induction. Thus, using a spatial or temporal framework for autobiographical event generation alters the associated details that are accessed.

摘要

回忆和想象自传体经历涉及在时空背景下构建事件表征。我们测试了在主要是空间(事件发生的地点)或时间(发生的动作序列)背景下生成自传体事件是否会影响相关心理表征的构建方式。我们利用了经过充分验证的情节特异性诱导(ESI)技术,该技术已知会影响后续任务中情节过程的使用,开发了选择性增强空间或时间处理的变体。我们测试了这些诱导对描述过去和未来自传体事件所使用的细节的影响。我们首先复制了标准的 ESI 效应,表明 ESI 增强了在描述自传体事件时生成情节细节的能力,特别是那些基于感知的细节(实验 1)。然后,我们直接比较了空间和时间诱导的效果(实验 2 和 3)。在描述自传体事件时,与控制或时间诱导相比,空间诱导增强了生成基于感知的情节细节的能力。与空间诱导相比,时间诱导后生成的情节细节中基于要点的比例更大,但与控制诱导相比没有差异。因此,使用自传体事件生成的空间或时间框架会改变所访问的相关细节。

相似文献

2
Selective effects of specificity inductions on episodic details: evidence for an event construction account.
Memory. 2019 Feb;27(2):250-260. doi: 10.1080/09658211.2018.1502322. Epub 2018 Jul 19.
3
The role of episodic memory in imagining autobiographical events: the influence of event expectancy and context familiarity.
Memory. 2022 May;30(5):573-590. doi: 10.1080/09658211.2022.2032178. Epub 2022 Feb 7.
4
The cognitive tools that support mentally constructing event and scene representations.
Memory. 2018 Jul;26(6):858-868. doi: 10.1080/09658211.2017.1417440. Epub 2017 Dec 27.
5
Brief inductions in episodic past or future thinking: effects on episodic detail and problem-solving.
Cogn Process. 2022 Feb;23(1):15-25. doi: 10.1007/s10339-021-01067-w. Epub 2021 Dec 2.
6
Remembering the past and imagining the future: Selective effects of an episodic specificity induction on detail generation.
Q J Exp Psychol (Hove). 2016;69(2):285-98. doi: 10.1080/17470218.2014.999097. Epub 2015 Feb 20.
8
Imagining future events in patients with unilateral temporal lobe epilepsy.
Br J Clin Psychol. 2016 Jun;55(2):187-205. doi: 10.1111/bjc.12107. Epub 2016 Feb 18.
9
Relational processing demands and the role of spatial context in the construction of episodic simulations.
J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn. 2020 Aug;46(8):1424-1441. doi: 10.1037/xlm0000831. Epub 2020 Mar 5.
10
Episodic and semantic content of memory and imagination: A multilevel analysis.
Mem Cognit. 2017 Oct;45(7):1078-1094. doi: 10.3758/s13421-017-0716-1.

引用本文的文献

2
Testing the modifiability of episodic future thinking and episodic memory among suicidal and nonsuicidal adolescents.
JCPP Adv. 2024 Apr 8;4(3):e12236. doi: 10.1002/jcv2.12236. eCollection 2024 Sep.
3
Shape of the past: Revealing detail arcs while narrating memories of autobiographical life events across the lifespan.
Psychon Bull Rev. 2025 Apr;32(2):896-906. doi: 10.3758/s13423-024-02592-3. Epub 2024 Oct 14.
4
The Language of Creativity: Evidence from Humans and Large Language Models.
J Creat Behav. 2024 Mar;58(1):128-136. doi: 10.1002/jocb.636. Epub 2024 Jan 11.
5
Using an episodic specificity induction to improve children's future thinking.
Front Psychol. 2023 Oct 19;14:1249090. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2023.1249090. eCollection 2023.
6
Autobiographical event memory and aging: older adults get the gist.
Trends Cogn Sci. 2022 Dec;26(12):1079-1089. doi: 10.1016/j.tics.2022.09.007. Epub 2022 Oct 1.
7
Selective effects of focusing on spatial details in episodic future thinking for self-relevant positive events.
Psychol Res. 2023 Mar;87(2):613-623. doi: 10.1007/s00426-022-01668-w. Epub 2022 Mar 9.
8
Brief inductions in episodic past or future thinking: effects on episodic detail and problem-solving.
Cogn Process. 2022 Feb;23(1):15-25. doi: 10.1007/s10339-021-01067-w. Epub 2021 Dec 2.
9
Dynamic Content Reactivation Supports Naturalistic Autobiographical Recall in Humans.
J Neurosci. 2021 Jan 6;41(1):153-166. doi: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.1490-20.2020. Epub 2020 Nov 17.
10
Links between autobiographical memory richness and temporal discounting in older adults.
Sci Rep. 2020 Apr 14;10(1):6431. doi: 10.1038/s41598-020-63373-1.

本文引用的文献

1
Episodic specificity induction and scene construction: Evidence for an event construction account.
Conscious Cogn. 2019 Feb;68:1-11. doi: 10.1016/j.concog.2018.12.001. Epub 2018 Dec 18.
2
Spatial scaffold effects in event memory and imagination.
Wiley Interdiscip Rev Cogn Sci. 2018 Jul;9(4):e1462. doi: 10.1002/wcs.1462. Epub 2018 Feb 27.
3
The Primacy of Spatial Context in the Neural Representation of Events.
J Neurosci. 2018 Mar 14;38(11):2755-2765. doi: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.1638-17.2018. Epub 2018 Feb 9.
4
The cognitive tools that support mentally constructing event and scene representations.
Memory. 2018 Jul;26(6):858-868. doi: 10.1080/09658211.2017.1417440. Epub 2017 Dec 27.
5
Temporal and spatial context in the mind and brain.
Curr Opin Behav Sci. 2017 Oct;17:14-19. doi: 10.1016/j.cobeha.2017.05.022.
7
What's in a context? Cautions, limitations, and potential paths forward.
Neurosci Lett. 2018 Jul 27;680:77-87. doi: 10.1016/j.neulet.2017.05.022. Epub 2017 May 18.
8
Enhancing memory and imagination improves problem solving among individuals with depression.
Mem Cognit. 2017 Aug;45(6):932-939. doi: 10.3758/s13421-017-0706-3.
9
The precuneus and hippocampus contribute to individual differences in the unfolding of spatial representations during episodic autobiographical memory.
Neuropsychologia. 2018 Feb;110:123-133. doi: 10.1016/j.neuropsychologia.2017.03.029. Epub 2017 Mar 30.
10
Incidental context information increases recollection.
Learn Mem. 2017 Feb 15;24(3):136-139. doi: 10.1101/lm.042622.116. Print 2017 Mar.

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验