• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

伊比利亚半岛陆生哺乳动物数字可及知识的完整性

Completeness of Digital Accessible Knowledge (DAK) about terrestrial mammals in the Iberian Peninsula.

机构信息

Universidad de Navarra, Department of Environmental Biology, Pamplona, Spain.

出版信息

PLoS One. 2019 Mar 8;14(3):e0213542. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0213542. eCollection 2019.

DOI:10.1371/journal.pone.0213542
PMID:30849112
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC6407841/
Abstract

The advent of online data aggregator infrastructures has facilitated the accumulation of Digital Accessible Knowledge (DAK) about biodiversity. Despite the vast amount of freely available data records, their usefulness for research depends on completeness of each body of data regarding their spatial, temporal and taxonomic coverage. In this paper, we assess the completeness of DAK about terrestrial mammals distributed across the Iberian Peninsula. We compiled a dataset with all records about mammals occurring in the Iberian Peninsula available in the Global Biodiversity Information Facility and in the national atlases from Portugal and Spain. After cleaning the dataset of errors as well as records lacking collection dates or not determined to species level, we assigned all occurrences to a 10-km grid. We assessed inventory completeness by calculating the ratio between observed and expected richness (based on the Chao2 richness index) in each grid cell and classified cells as well-sampled or under-sampled. We evaluated survey coverage of well-sampled cells along four environmental gradients and temporal coverage. Out of 796,283 retrieved records, quality issues led us to remove 616,141 records unfit for this use. The main reason for discarding records was missing collection dates. Only 25.95% cells contained enough records to robustly estimate completeness. The DAK about terrestrial mammals from the Iberian Peninsula was low, and spatially and temporally biased. Out of 5,874 cells holding data, only 620 (9.95%) were classified as well-sampled. Moreover, well-sampled cells were geographically aggregated and reached inventory completeness over the same temporal range. Despite the increasing availability of DAK, its usefulness is still compromised by quality issues and gaps in data. Future work should therefore focus on increasing data quality, in addition to mobilizing unpublished data.

摘要

在线数据聚合基础设施的出现促进了数字可获取生物多样性知识(DAK)的积累。尽管有大量免费可用的数据记录,但它们对研究的有用性取决于每个数据集在空间、时间和分类覆盖方面的完整性。在本文中,我们评估了分布在伊比利亚半岛的陆地哺乳动物的 DAK 完整性。我们编制了一个数据集,其中包含全球生物多样性信息设施和葡萄牙和西班牙国家地图集中关于伊比利亚半岛出现的哺乳动物的所有记录。在清理数据集以消除错误以及缺乏采集日期或未确定到物种水平的记录后,我们将所有出现的情况分配到 10km 的网格中。我们通过计算每个网格单元中观察到的丰富度与预期丰富度(基于 Chao2 丰富度指数)的比值来评估库存的完整性,并将单元分类为充分采样或采样不足。我们评估了充分采样单元在四个环境梯度和时间覆盖方面的调查覆盖范围。在检索到的 796283 条记录中,质量问题导致我们删除了 616141 条不适合此用途的记录。丢弃记录的主要原因是缺少采集日期。只有 25.95%的单元包含足够的记录来可靠地估计完整性。伊比利亚半岛陆地哺乳动物的 DAK 数量较少,且在空间和时间上存在偏差。在包含数据的 5874 个单元中,只有 620 个(9.95%)被归类为充分采样。此外,充分采样的单元在地理上聚集在一起,并在相同的时间范围内达到了库存的完整性。尽管 DAK 的可用性不断增加,但数据质量问题和数据空白仍然影响了其有用性。因此,未来的工作应该除了调动未公开的数据外,还应侧重于提高数据质量。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/537f/6407841/5bc71a0cb228/pone.0213542.g005.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/537f/6407841/a84d57d3107a/pone.0213542.g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/537f/6407841/a2ff66054659/pone.0213542.g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/537f/6407841/474500c90faa/pone.0213542.g003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/537f/6407841/ca6525f8ad63/pone.0213542.g004.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/537f/6407841/5bc71a0cb228/pone.0213542.g005.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/537f/6407841/a84d57d3107a/pone.0213542.g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/537f/6407841/a2ff66054659/pone.0213542.g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/537f/6407841/474500c90faa/pone.0213542.g003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/537f/6407841/ca6525f8ad63/pone.0213542.g004.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/537f/6407841/5bc71a0cb228/pone.0213542.g005.jpg

相似文献

1
Completeness of Digital Accessible Knowledge (DAK) about terrestrial mammals in the Iberian Peninsula.伊比利亚半岛陆生哺乳动物数字可及知识的完整性
PLoS One. 2019 Mar 8;14(3):e0213542. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0213542. eCollection 2019.
2
Assessing spatial and temporal biases and gaps in the publicly available distributional information of Iberian mosses.评估伊比利亚苔藓公开可用分布信息中的空间和时间偏差及差距。
Biodivers Data J. 2020 Sep 15;8:e53474. doi: 10.3897/BDJ.8.e53474. eCollection 2020.
3
Assessing citizen science data quality for bird monitoring in the Iberian Peninsula.评估伊比利亚半岛鸟类监测公民科学数据质量。
Sci Rep. 2024 Sep 2;14(1):20307. doi: 10.1038/s41598-024-70827-3.
4
Filling in the GAPS: evaluating completeness and coverage of open-access biodiversity databases in the United States.填补差距:评估美国开放获取生物多样性数据库的完整性和覆盖范围
Ecol Evol. 2016 Jun 12;6(14):4654-69. doi: 10.1002/ece3.2225. eCollection 2016 Jul.
5
Mapping Knowledge Gaps of Mozambique's Terrestrial Mammals.绘制莫桑比克陆地哺乳动物知识空白图。
Sci Rep. 2019 Dec 3;9(1):18184. doi: 10.1038/s41598-019-54590-4.
6
The effectiveness of Iberian protected areas in conserving terrestrial biodiversity.伊比利亚保护区在保护陆地生物多样性方面的成效。
Conserv Biol. 2007 Dec;21(6):1423-32. doi: 10.1111/j.1523-1739.2007.00827.x.
7
Global priorities for an effective information basis of biodiversity distributions.建立有效生物多样性分布信息基础的全球优先事项。
Nat Commun. 2015 Sep 8;6:8221. doi: 10.1038/ncomms9221.
8
Research applications of primary biodiversity databases in the digital age.生物多样性基础数据库在数字时代的研究应用。
PLoS One. 2019 Sep 11;14(9):e0215794. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0215794. eCollection 2019.
9
Biodiversity analysis of true bug assemblages (Hemiptera, Heteroptera) in four habitats in the Garraf Natural Park (Barcelona, Spain).加罗夫自然公园(西班牙巴塞罗那)四个栖息地中蝽类昆虫(半翅目,异翅亚目)群落的生物多样性分析
J Insect Sci. 2014 Jan 1;14. doi: 10.1093/jisesa/ieu145. Print 2014.
10
A systematic survey of regional multi-taxon biodiversity: evaluating strategies and coverage.区域多分类群生物多样性的系统调查:评估策略和覆盖范围。
BMC Ecol. 2019 Oct 15;19(1):43. doi: 10.1186/s12898-019-0260-x.

引用本文的文献

1
Assessing citizen science data quality for bird monitoring in the Iberian Peninsula.评估伊比利亚半岛鸟类监测公民科学数据质量。
Sci Rep. 2024 Sep 2;14(1):20307. doi: 10.1038/s41598-024-70827-3.

本文引用的文献

1
Data Leakage and Loss in Biodiversity Informatics.生物多样性信息学中的数据泄露与损失
Biodivers Data J. 2018 Nov 7(6):e26826. doi: 10.3897/BDJ.6.e26826. eCollection 2018.
2
Temporal degradation of data limits biodiversity research.数据的时效性退化限制了生物多样性研究。
Ecol Evol. 2017 Jul 27;7(17):6863-6870. doi: 10.1002/ece3.3259. eCollection 2017 Sep.
3
Biodiversity data obsolescence and land uses changes.生物多样性数据过时与土地利用变化。
PeerJ. 2016 Dec 13;4:e2743. doi: 10.7717/peerj.2743. eCollection 2016.
4
Estimating species diversity and distribution in the era of Big Data: to what extent can we trust public databases?大数据时代的物种多样性与分布估算:我们对公共数据库的信任度究竟有多高?
Glob Ecol Biogeogr. 2015 Aug;24(8):973-984. doi: 10.1111/geb.12326. Epub 2015 May 25.
5
Digital Accessible Knowledge and well-inventoried sites for birds in Mexico: baseline sites for measuring faunistic change.墨西哥鸟类的数字可获取知识与详细编目网站:衡量动物区系变化的基线站点。
PeerJ. 2016 Sep 7;4:e2362. doi: 10.7717/peerj.2362. eCollection 2016.
6
Filling in the GAPS: evaluating completeness and coverage of open-access biodiversity databases in the United States.填补差距:评估美国开放获取生物多样性数据库的完整性和覆盖范围
Ecol Evol. 2016 Jun 12;6(14):4654-69. doi: 10.1002/ece3.2225. eCollection 2016 Jul.
7
Multidimensional biases, gaps and uncertainties in global plant occurrence information.全球植物分布信息中的多维偏差、差距和不确定性。
Ecol Lett. 2016 Aug;19(8):992-1006. doi: 10.1111/ele.12624. Epub 2016 Jun 2.
8
Coverage-based rarefaction and extrapolation: standardizing samples by completeness rather than size.基于覆盖度的稀有度估计和外推:通过完整性而不是大小来标准化样本。
Ecology. 2012 Dec;93(12):2533-47. doi: 10.1890/11-1952.1.
9
Assessing the primary data hosted by the Spanish node of the Global Biodiversity Information Facility (GBIF).评估全球生物多样性信息设施(GBIF)西班牙节点托管的原始数据。
PLoS One. 2013;8(1):e55144. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0055144. Epub 2013 Jan 25.
10
Distorted views of biodiversity: spatial and temporal bias in species occurrence data.生物多样性的扭曲观点:物种出现数据中的时空偏差。
PLoS Biol. 2010 Jun 1;8(6):e1000385. doi: 10.1371/journal.pbio.1000385.