• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

生物多样性数据过时与土地利用变化。

Biodiversity data obsolescence and land uses changes.

作者信息

Escribano Nora, Ariño Arturo H, Galicia David

机构信息

Department of Environmental Biology, Universidad de Navarra , Pamplona , Spain.

出版信息

PeerJ. 2016 Dec 13;4:e2743. doi: 10.7717/peerj.2743. eCollection 2016.

DOI:10.7717/peerj.2743
PMID:27994967
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC5157196/
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Primary biodiversity records (PBR) are essential in many areas of scientific research as they document the biodiversity through time and space. However, concerns about PBR quality and fitness-for-use have grown, especially as derived from taxonomical, geographical and sampling effort biases. Nonetheless, the temporal bias stemming from data ageing has received less attention. We examine the effect of changes in land use in the information currentness, and therefore data obsolescence, in biodiversity databases.

METHODS

We created maps of land use changes for three periods (1956-1985, 1985-2000 and 2000-2012) at 5-kilometres resolution. For each cell we calculated the percentage of land use change within each period. We then overlaid distribution data about small mammals, and classified each data as 'non-obsolete or 'obsolete,' depending on both the amount of land use changes in the cell, and whether changes occurred at or after the data sampling's date.

RESULTS

A total of 14,528 records out of the initial 59,677 turned out to be non-obsolete after taking into account the changes in the land uses in Navarra. These obsolete data existed in 115 of the 156 cells analysed. Furthermore, more than one half of the remaining cells holding non-obsolete records had not been visited at least for the last fifteen years.

CONCLUSION

Land use changes challenge the actual information obtainable from biodiversity datasets and therefore its potential uses. With the passage of time, one can expect a steady increase in the availability and use of biological records-but not without them becoming older and likely to be obsolete by land uses changes. Therefore, it becomes necessary to assess records' obsolescence, as it may jeopardize the knowledge and perception of biodiversity patterns.

摘要

背景

原始生物多样性记录(PBR)在许多科学研究领域至关重要,因为它们记录了生物多样性在时间和空间上的变化。然而,人们对PBR的质量和适用性的担忧与日俱增,尤其是由于分类学、地理和采样努力偏差导致的问题。尽管如此,数据老化导致的时间偏差却较少受到关注。我们研究了土地利用变化对生物多样性数据库中信息时效性以及数据过时情况的影响。

方法

我们创建了三个时期(1956 - 1985年、1985 - 2000年和2000 - 2012年)分辨率为5公里的土地利用变化地图。对于每个单元格,我们计算了每个时期内土地利用变化的百分比。然后我们叠加了小型哺乳动物的分布数据,并根据单元格内土地利用变化的数量以及变化是否发生在数据采样日期或之后,将每个数据分类为“非过时”或“过时”。

结果

在考虑了纳瓦拉地区的土地利用变化后,最初的59,677条记录中共有14,528条记录被证明是非过时的。这些过时数据存在于所分析的156个单元格中的115个单元格中。此外,持有非过时记录的其余单元格中,超过一半在过去至少十五年内没有被访问过。

结论

土地利用变化对从生物多样性数据集中可获得的实际信息及其潜在用途构成了挑战。随着时间的推移,可以预期生物记录的可用性和使用将稳步增加——但前提是它们不会随着时间推移而变得陈旧,并且可能因土地利用变化而过时。因此,有必要评估记录的过时情况,因为这可能会危及对生物多样性模式的认识和理解。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/969b/5157196/22761141da23/peerj-04-2743-g004.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/969b/5157196/d71f10cb6a16/peerj-04-2743-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/969b/5157196/c25e0505d4f0/peerj-04-2743-g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/969b/5157196/cc550dcf0928/peerj-04-2743-g003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/969b/5157196/22761141da23/peerj-04-2743-g004.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/969b/5157196/d71f10cb6a16/peerj-04-2743-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/969b/5157196/c25e0505d4f0/peerj-04-2743-g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/969b/5157196/cc550dcf0928/peerj-04-2743-g003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/969b/5157196/22761141da23/peerj-04-2743-g004.jpg

相似文献

1
Biodiversity data obsolescence and land uses changes.生物多样性数据过时与土地利用变化。
PeerJ. 2016 Dec 13;4:e2743. doi: 10.7717/peerj.2743. eCollection 2016.
2
Assessing spatial and temporal biases and gaps in the publicly available distributional information of Iberian mosses.评估伊比利亚苔藓公开可用分布信息中的空间和时间偏差及差距。
Biodivers Data J. 2020 Sep 15;8:e53474. doi: 10.3897/BDJ.8.e53474. eCollection 2020.
3
Biodiversity scenarios neglect future land-use changes.生物多样性情景忽略了未来的土地利用变化。
Glob Chang Biol. 2016 Jul;22(7):2505-15. doi: 10.1111/gcb.13272. Epub 2016 Mar 31.
4
Impacts of future climate and land cover changes on threatened mammals in the semi-arid Chinese Altai Mountains.未来气候和土地覆盖变化对中国阿尔泰山半干旱地区受威胁哺乳动物的影响。
Sci Total Environ. 2018 Jan 15;612:775-787. doi: 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2017.08.191. Epub 2017 Sep 1.
5
The dimensions of land use change in rural landscapes: lessons learnt from the GB Countryside Surveys.乡村景观中土地利用变化的维度:从英国乡村调查中获得的经验教训。
J Environ Manage. 2009 Jul;90(9):2851-6. doi: 10.1016/j.jenvman.2008.05.023. Epub 2008 Oct 2.
6
Subdivision design and stewardship affect bird and mammal use of conservation developments.细分设计和管理影响保护发展中鸟类和哺乳动物的利用。
Ecol Appl. 2017 Jun;27(4):1236-1252. doi: 10.1002/eap.1517. Epub 2017 Apr 6.
7
Assessing the primary data hosted by the Spanish node of the Global Biodiversity Information Facility (GBIF).评估全球生物多样性信息设施(GBIF)西班牙节点托管的原始数据。
PLoS One. 2013;8(1):e55144. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0055144. Epub 2013 Jan 25.
8
The apparent exponential radiation of Phanerozoic land vertebrates is an artefact of spatial sampling biases.显生宙陆地脊椎动物明显的辐射进化是空间采样偏差的人为产物。
Proc Biol Sci. 2020 Apr 8;287(1924):20200372. doi: 10.1098/rspb.2020.0372.
9
Threats and opportunities for freshwater conservation under future land use change scenarios in the United States.未来土地利用变化情景下美国淡水保护的威胁与机遇。
Glob Chang Biol. 2014 Jan;20(1):113-24. doi: 10.1111/gcb.12383. Epub 2013 Oct 17.
10
Urban and industrial land uses have a higher soil biological quality than expected from physicochemical quality.城市和工业用地的土壤生物质量高于理化质量所预期的水平。
Sci Total Environ. 2017 Apr 15;584-585:614-621. doi: 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2017.01.086. Epub 2017 Jan 25.

引用本文的文献

1
Open Data Practices among Users of Primary Biodiversity Data.原生生物多样性数据使用者的开放数据实践
Bioscience. 2021 Aug 18;71(11):1128-1147. doi: 10.1093/biosci/biab072. eCollection 2021 Nov.
2
Estimates of Species Richness and Composition Depend on Detection Method in Assemblages of Terrestrial Mammals.在陆生哺乳动物群落中,物种丰富度和组成的估计取决于检测方法。
Animals (Basel). 2021 Jan 14;11(1):186. doi: 10.3390/ani11010186.
3
Research applications of primary biodiversity databases in the digital age.生物多样性基础数据库在数字时代的研究应用。

本文引用的文献

1
Long-term data set of small mammals from owl pellets in the Atlantic-Mediterranean transition area.大西洋-地中海过渡区猫头鹰食丸中小哺乳动物的长期数据集。
Sci Data. 2016 Sep 27;3:160085. doi: 10.1038/sdata.2016.85.
2
Ecological traits affect the sensitivity of bees to land-use pressures in European agricultural landscapes.生态特征影响蜜蜂对欧洲农业景观中土地利用压力的敏感性。
J Appl Ecol. 2015 Dec;52(6):1567-1577. doi: 10.1111/1365-2664.12524. Epub 2015 Sep 23.
3
Data acquisition for conservation assessments: is the effort worth it?
PLoS One. 2019 Sep 11;14(9):e0215794. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0215794. eCollection 2019.
4
Completeness of Digital Accessible Knowledge (DAK) about terrestrial mammals in the Iberian Peninsula.伊比利亚半岛陆生哺乳动物数字可及知识的完整性
PLoS One. 2019 Mar 8;14(3):e0213542. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0213542. eCollection 2019.
5
Data Leakage and Loss in Biodiversity Informatics.生物多样性信息学中的数据泄露与损失
Biodivers Data J. 2018 Nov 7(6):e26826. doi: 10.3897/BDJ.6.e26826. eCollection 2018.
6
Global mapping of potential natural vegetation: an assessment of machine learning algorithms for estimating land potential.潜在自然植被的全球制图:用于估算土地潜力的机器学习算法评估
PeerJ. 2018 Aug 22;6:e5457. doi: 10.7717/peerj.5457. eCollection 2018.
7
Temporal degradation of data limits biodiversity research.数据的时效性退化限制了生物多样性研究。
Ecol Evol. 2017 Jul 27;7(17):6863-6870. doi: 10.1002/ece3.3259. eCollection 2017 Sep.
8
Taxonomic bias in biodiversity data and societal preferences.生物多样性数据中的分类学偏差与社会偏好。
Sci Rep. 2017 Aug 22;7(1):9132. doi: 10.1038/s41598-017-09084-6.
保护评估的数据采集:付出的努力值得吗?
PLoS One. 2013;8(3):e59662. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0059662. Epub 2013 Mar 26.
4
Land-cover change and avian diversity in the conterminous United States.美国本土的土地覆盖变化与鸟类多样性
Conserv Biol. 2012 Oct;26(5):821-9. doi: 10.1111/j.1523-1739.2012.01867.x. Epub 2012 Jun 25.
5
Distorted views of biodiversity: spatial and temporal bias in species occurrence data.生物多样性的扭曲观点:物种出现数据中的时空偏差。
PLoS Biol. 2010 Jun 1;8(6):e1000385. doi: 10.1371/journal.pbio.1000385.
6
How can a knowledge of the past help to conserve the future? Biodiversity conservation and the relevance of long-term ecological studies.对过去的了解如何有助于保护未来?生物多样性保护与长期生态研究的相关性。
Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci. 2007 Feb 28;362(1478):175-86. doi: 10.1098/rstb.2006.1977.
7
Global biodiversity scenarios for the year 2100.2100年全球生物多样性情景
Science. 2000 Mar 10;287(5459):1770-4. doi: 10.1126/science.287.5459.1770.