• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

髋关节置换术后不良事件的验证:一项瑞典多中心队列研究。

Validation of adverse events after hip arthroplasty: a Swedish multi-centre cohort study.

机构信息

Department of Clinical Sciences at Danderyd Hospital, Division of Orthopaedics, Karolinska Institutet, Stockholm, Sweden.

Department of Orthopaedics, Danderyd University Hospital Corp., Stockholm, Sweden.

出版信息

BMJ Open. 2019 Mar 7;9(3):e023773. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2018-023773.

DOI:10.1136/bmjopen-2018-023773
PMID:30850403
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC6429990/
Abstract

OBJECTIVES

Preventing adverse events (AEs) after orthopaedic surgery is a field with great room for improvement. A Swedish instrument for measuring AEs after hip arthroplasty based on administrative data from the national patient register is used by both the Swedish Hip Arthroplasty Register and the Swedish Association of Local Authorities and Regions. It has never been validated and its accuracy is unknown. The aim of this study was to validate the instrument's ability to detect AEs, and to calculate the incidence of AEs following primary hip arthroplasties.

DESIGN

Retrospective cohort study using retrospective record review with Global Trigger Tool methodology in combination with register data.

SETTING

24 different hospitals in four major regions of Sweden.

PARTICIPANTS

2000 patients with either total or hemi-hip arthroplasty were recruited from the SHAR. We included both acute and elective patients.

PRIMARY AND SECONDARY OUTCOME MEASURES

The sensitivity and specificity of the instrument. Adjusted cumulative incidence and incidence rate.

RESULTS

The sensitivity for all identified AEs was 5.7% (95% CI: 4.9% to 6.7%) for 30 days and 14.8% (95% CI: 8.2 to 24.3) for 90 days, and the specificity was 95.2% (95% CI: 93.5% to 96.6%) for 30 days and 92.1% (95% CI: 89.9% to 93.8%) for 90 days. The adjusted cumulative incidence for all AEs was 28.4% (95% CI: 25.0% to 32.3%) for 30 days and 29.5% (95% CI: 26.0% to 33.8%) for 90 days. The incidence rate was 0.43 AEs per person-month (95% CI: 0.39 to 0.47).

CONCLUSIONS

The AE incidence was high, and most AEs occurred within the first 30 days. The instrument sensitivity for AEs was very low for both 30 and 90 days, but the specificity was high for both 30 and 90 days. The studied instrument is insufficient for valid measurements of AEs after hip arthroplasty.

摘要

目的

预防骨科手术后的不良事件(AE)是一个有很大改进空间的领域。一种基于全国患者登记处行政数据的瑞典髋关节置换术后 AE 测量仪器,被瑞典髋关节置换登记处和瑞典地方当局和地区协会同时使用。它从未经过验证,其准确性也未知。本研究的目的是验证该仪器检测 AE 的能力,并计算初次髋关节置换术后 AE 的发生率。

设计

使用回顾性记录回顾的回顾性队列研究,结合全球触发工具方法和登记数据。

地点

瑞典四个主要地区的 24 家不同医院。

参与者

从 SHAR 招募了 2000 名接受全髋关节或半髋关节置换术的患者。我们纳入了急性和择期患者。

主要和次要结果测量

仪器的灵敏度和特异性。调整后的累积发生率和发生率。

结果

所有确定的 AE 的灵敏度在 30 天时为 5.7%(95%CI:4.9%至 6.7%),在 90 天时为 14.8%(95%CI:8.2%至 24.3%),特异性在 30 天时为 95.2%(95%CI:93.5%至 96.6%),在 90 天时为 92.1%(95%CI:89.9%至 93.8%)。所有 AE 的调整后的累积发生率在 30 天时为 28.4%(95%CI:25.0%至 32.3%),在 90 天时为 29.5%(95%CI:26.0%至 33.8%)。发生率为 0.43 例/人月(95%CI:0.39 至 0.47)。

结论

AE 的发生率很高,大多数 AE 发生在 30 天内。该仪器对 30 天和 90 天的 AE 敏感性都非常低,但特异性都很高。该研究仪器对于髋关节置换术后 AE 的有效测量是不足的。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/fc07/6429990/bbe166b3708b/bmjopen-2018-023773f01.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/fc07/6429990/bbe166b3708b/bmjopen-2018-023773f01.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/fc07/6429990/bbe166b3708b/bmjopen-2018-023773f01.jpg

相似文献

1
Validation of adverse events after hip arthroplasty: a Swedish multi-centre cohort study.髋关节置换术后不良事件的验证:一项瑞典多中心队列研究。
BMJ Open. 2019 Mar 7;9(3):e023773. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2018-023773.
2
Measuring adverse events following hip arthroplasty surgery using administrative data without relying on ICD-codes.使用行政数据而非 ICD 编码来测量髋关节置换术后的不良事件。
PLoS One. 2020 Nov 5;15(11):e0242008. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0242008. eCollection 2020.
3
Only 8% of major preventable adverse events after hip arthroplasty are filed as claims: a Swedish multi-center cohort study on 1,998 patients.仅有 8%的髋关节置换术后主要可预防不良事件被上报为索赔:一项涉及 1998 例患者的瑞典多中心队列研究。
Acta Orthop. 2020 Feb;91(1):20-25. doi: 10.1080/17453674.2019.1677382. Epub 2019 Oct 16.
4
More hip complications after total hip arthroplasty than after hemi-arthroplasty as hip fracture treatment: analysis of 5,815 matched pairs in the Swedish Hip Arthroplasty Register.全髋关节置换术后髋关节并发症多于髋关节骨折治疗的半髋关节置换术:瑞典髋关节置换登记处 5815 对匹配对的分析。
Acta Orthop. 2020 Apr;91(2):133-138. doi: 10.1080/17453674.2019.1690339. Epub 2019 Nov 18.
5
Timing of adverse events in patients undergoing acute and elective hip arthroplasty surgery: a multicentre cohort study using the Global Trigger Tool.接受急性和择期髋关节置换术患者不良事件的时间:使用全球触发工具的多中心队列研究。
BMJ Open. 2023 Jun 9;13(6):e064794. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2022-064794.
6
A small number of surgeons outside the control-limit: an observational study based on 9,482 cases and 208 surgeons performing primary total hip arthroplasties in western Sweden.少数超出控制限的外科医生:一项基于在瑞典西部进行的 9482 例初次全髋关节置换术和 208 名外科医生的观察性研究。
Acta Orthop. 2020 Oct;91(5):581-586. doi: 10.1080/17453674.2020.1772584. Epub 2020 Jun 8.
7
Exploring the incidence and nature of nursing-sensitive orthopaedic adverse events: A multicenter cohort study using Global Trigger Tool.探索护理敏感型骨科不良事件的发生率和性质:使用全球触发工具的多中心队列研究。
Int J Nurs Stud. 2020 Feb;102:103473. doi: 10.1016/j.ijnurstu.2019.103473. Epub 2019 Nov 13.
8
Multi-state analysis of hemi- and total hip arthroplasty for hip fractures in the Swedish population-Results from a Swedish national database study of 38,912 patients.瑞典人群髋部骨折半髋关节置换术和全髋关节置换术的多状态分析——来自瑞典全国数据库对38912例患者的研究结果
Injury. 2019 Feb;50(2):272-277. doi: 10.1016/j.injury.2018.12.022. Epub 2018 Dec 19.
9
Hip arthroplasty for acute hip fracture in patients with neurological disorders: A report Of 9,702 cases from the Swedish arthroplasty register.神经疾病患者急性髋部骨折的髋关节置换术:来自瑞典关节置换登记处的 9702 例报告。
Injury. 2022 Mar;53(3):1202-1208. doi: 10.1016/j.injury.2021.09.028. Epub 2021 Sep 21.
10
Incidence of adverse events in Sweden during 2013-2016: a cohort study describing the implementation of a national trigger tool.2013 - 2016年瑞典不良事件的发生率:一项描述国家触发工具实施情况的队列研究
BMJ Open. 2018 Mar 30;8(3):e020833. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2017-020833.

引用本文的文献

1
Validating adverse events in administrative healthcare data in ireland: a retrospective chart review study.验证爱尔兰医疗保健管理数据中的不良事件:一项回顾性图表审查研究。
BMC Health Serv Res. 2025 Aug 20;25(1):1113. doi: 10.1186/s12913-025-13201-x.
2
Reduced periprosthetic fracture rate for a cemented anatomical versus a tapered polished stem in hip arthroplasty: A 6-year follow-up of a prospective observational cohort study.髋关节置换术中,骨水泥型解剖型假体与锥形抛光柄假体相比,假体周围骨折发生率降低:一项前瞻性观察队列研究的6年随访结果
J Exp Orthop. 2025 Apr 16;12(2):e70243. doi: 10.1002/jeo2.70243. eCollection 2025 Apr.
3

本文引用的文献

1
Factors Associated with Adverse Events in Inpatient Elective Spine, Knee, and Hip Orthopaedic Surgery.与住院择期脊柱、膝关节和髋关节骨科手术不良事件相关的因素。
J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2017 Aug 16;99(16):1365-1372. doi: 10.2106/JBJS.16.00843.
2
Current Quality Measurement Tools Are Insufficient to Assess Complications in Orthopedic Surgery.当前的质量测量工具不足以评估骨科手术中的并发症。
J Hand Surg Am. 2017 Jan;42(1):10-15.e1. doi: 10.1016/j.jhsa.2016.09.014. Epub 2016 Nov 23.
3
Adverse events in orthopedic care identified via the Global Trigger Tool in Sweden - implications on preventable prolonged hospitalizations.
A scoping review of the methodological approaches used in retrospective chart reviews to validate adverse event rates in administrative data.
回顾性图表审查中用于验证行政数据中不良事件发生率的方法学方法的范围综述。
Int J Qual Health Care. 2024 May 10;36(2). doi: 10.1093/intqhc/mzae037.
4
Timing of adverse events in patients undergoing acute and elective hip arthroplasty surgery: a multicentre cohort study using the Global Trigger Tool.接受急性和择期髋关节置换术患者不良事件的时间:使用全球触发工具的多中心队列研究。
BMJ Open. 2023 Jun 9;13(6):e064794. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2022-064794.
5
Variation in detected adverse events using trigger tools: A systematic review and meta-analysis.使用触发工具检测到的不良事件的变化:系统评价和荟萃分析。
PLoS One. 2022 Sep 1;17(9):e0273800. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0273800. eCollection 2022.
6
Measuring adverse events following hip arthroplasty surgery using administrative data without relying on ICD-codes.使用行政数据而非 ICD 编码来测量髋关节置换术后的不良事件。
PLoS One. 2020 Nov 5;15(11):e0242008. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0242008. eCollection 2020.
7
Only 8% of major preventable adverse events after hip arthroplasty are filed as claims: a Swedish multi-center cohort study on 1,998 patients.仅有 8%的髋关节置换术后主要可预防不良事件被上报为索赔:一项涉及 1998 例患者的瑞典多中心队列研究。
Acta Orthop. 2020 Feb;91(1):20-25. doi: 10.1080/17453674.2019.1677382. Epub 2019 Oct 16.
通过瑞典全球触发工具识别的骨科护理不良事件——对可预防的长期住院的影响
Patient Saf Surg. 2016 Oct 26;10:23. doi: 10.1186/s13037-016-0112-y. eCollection 2016.
4
Preoperative prediction of potentially preventable morbidity after fast-track hip and knee arthroplasty: a detailed descriptive cohort study.快速康复髋膝关节置换术后潜在可预防并发症的术前预测:一项详细的描述性队列研究。
BMJ Open. 2016 Jan 12;6(1):e009813. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2015-009813.
5
Are administrative data valid when measuring patient safety in hospitals? A comparison of data collection methods using a chart review and administrative data.在衡量医院患者安全时,行政数据是否有效?使用病历审查和行政数据的数据收集方法比较。
Int J Qual Health Care. 2015 Aug;27(4):305-13. doi: 10.1093/intqhc/mzv045. Epub 2015 Jul 1.
6
Complications of Total Hip Arthroplasty: Standardized List, Definitions, and Stratification Developed by The Hip Society.全髋关节置换术的并发症:由髋关节协会制定的标准化列表、定义及分层
Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2016 Feb;474(2):357-64. doi: 10.1007/s11999-015-4341-7.
7
Early failures in total hip arthroplasty -- a changing paradigm.全髋关节置换术的早期失败——范式转变。
J Arthroplasty. 2014 Jun;29(6):1285-8. doi: 10.1016/j.arth.2013.12.024. Epub 2013 Dec 21.
8
Is detection of adverse events affected by record review methodology? an evaluation of the "Harvard Medical Practice Study" method and the "Global Trigger Tool".不良事件的检测是否受病历审查方法的影响?对“哈佛医疗实践研究”方法和“全球触发工具”的评估。
Patient Saf Surg. 2013 Apr 15;7(1):10. doi: 10.1186/1754-9493-7-10.
9
Adverse outcomes in hip arthroplasty: long-term trends.髋关节置换术的不良结局:长期趋势。
J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2012 Jul 18;94(14):e103. doi: 10.2106/JBJS.K.00011.
10
Age and obesity are risk factors for adverse events after total hip arthroplasty.年龄和肥胖是全髋关节置换术后不良事件的危险因素。
Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2012 Feb;470(2):490-6. doi: 10.1007/s11999-011-1967-y.