Dale Ariella Perry, Ebell Mark, McKay Brian, Handel Andreas, Forehand Ronald, Dobbin Kevin
From Department of Epidemiology and Biostatistics, University of Georgia, Athens (APD, ME, BM, AH, KD); Center for Ecology of Infectious Diseases, University of Georgia, Athens (AH); University Health Center, University of Georgia, Athens (RF).
J Am Board Fam Med. 2019 Mar-Apr;32(2):226-233. doi: 10.3122/jabfm.2019.02.180183.
Rapid influenza diagnostic tests that detect the presence of viral antigens are currently used throughout the United States but have poor sensitivity. The objective of this study was to identify if the use of a new highly accurate rapid point of care test would significantly increase the likelihood of guideline consistent care.
We prospectively recruited 300 students at a university health clinic who presented with cough and 1 influenza-like illness symptom between December 2016 and February 2017 to receive care guided by a rapid polymerase chain reaction (PCR) test. Of the 300 patients receiving the PCR test, 264 had complete medical records and were compared to 771 who received usual care. We used a logistic regression model to identify whether PCR guided care was associated with guideline consistent care, based on the appropriate use of oseltamivir and antibiotics. We also assessed whether PCR guided care decreased the likelihood of return visits within 2 weeks by patients.
Logistic regression revealed that the odds of receiving guideline supported care did not significantly increase for patients who received PCR guided care (adjusted odds ratio [aOR], 1.24; 95% CI, 0.83-1.88). It significantly decreased the likelihood of an antibiotic prescription (aOR, 0.61; 95% CI, 0.40-0.94), increased the likelihood of receiving oseltamivir (aOR, 1.57; 95% CI, 1.09-2.28), and decreased the likelihood of return visit within 2 weeks (aOR, 0.19; 95% CI, 0.04-0.81).
The use of a rapid PCR test did not significantly improve the likelihood of guideline consistent care. However, independent of test outcome, patients who received the test were more likely to receive an antiviral and less likely to receive an antibiotic or have a return visit within 2 weeks.
目前美国各地都在使用检测病毒抗原存在的快速流感诊断测试,但灵敏度较差。本研究的目的是确定使用一种新的高度准确的即时护理快速检测是否会显著增加符合指南护理的可能性。
我们前瞻性地招募了300名在大学健康诊所就诊的学生,他们在2016年12月至2017年2月期间出现咳嗽和1种流感样疾病症状,接受快速聚合酶链反应(PCR)检测指导的护理。在接受PCR检测的300名患者中,264名有完整的医疗记录,并与771名接受常规护理的患者进行比较。我们使用逻辑回归模型,根据奥司他韦和抗生素的合理使用情况,确定PCR指导的护理是否与符合指南的护理相关。我们还评估了PCR指导的护理是否降低了患者在2周内复诊的可能性。
逻辑回归显示,接受PCR指导护理的患者获得指南支持护理的几率没有显著增加(调整后的优势比[aOR],1.24;95%置信区间,0.83 - 1.88)。它显著降低了开具抗生素处方的可能性(aOR,0.61;95%置信区间,0.40 - 0.94),增加了接受奥司他韦治疗的可能性(aOR,1.57;95%置信区间,1.09 - 2.28),并降低了2周内复诊的可能性(aOR,0.19;95%置信区间,0.04 - 0.81)。
使用快速PCR检测并没有显著提高符合指南护理的可能性。然而,与检测结果无关,接受检测的患者更有可能接受抗病毒治疗,而接受抗生素治疗或在2周内复诊的可能性较小。