Department of Pathology, Keio University School of Medicine, Tokyo, Japan.
Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Keio University School of Medicine, Tokyo, Japan.
Carcinogenesis. 2019 Jul 4;40(5):611-623. doi: 10.1093/carcin/bgz046.
The present study was performed to clarify the significance of DNA methylation alterations during endometrial carcinogenesis. Genome-wide DNA methylation analysis and targeted sequencing of tumor-related genes were performed using the Infinium MethylationEPIC BeadChip and the Ion AmpliSeq Cancer Hotspot Panel v2, respectively, for 31 samples of normal control endometrial tissue from patients without endometrial cancer and 81 samples of endometrial cancer tissue. Principal component analysis revealed that tumor samples had a DNA methylation profile distinct from that of control samples. Gene Ontology enrichment analysis revealed significant differences of DNA methylation at 1034 CpG sites between early-onset endometrioid endometrial cancer (EE) tissue (patients aged ≤40 years) and late-onset endometrioid endometrial cancer (LE) tissue, which were accumulated among 'transcriptional factors'. Mutations of the CTNNB1 gene or DNA methylation alterations of genes participating in Wnt signaling were frequent in EEs, whereas genetic and epigenetic alterations of fibroblast growth factor signaling genes were observed in LEs. Unsupervised hierarchical clustering grouped EE samples in Cluster EA (n = 22) and samples in Cluster EB (n = 12). Clinicopathologically less aggressive tumors tended to be accumulated in Cluster EB, and DNA methylation levels of 18 genes including HOXA9, HOXD10 and SOX11 were associated with differences in such aggressiveness between the two clusters. We identified 11 marker CpG sites that discriminated EB samples from EA samples with 100% sensitivity and specificity. These data indicate that genetically and epigenetically different pathways may participate in the development of EEs and LEs, and that DNA methylation profiling may help predict tumors that are less aggressive and amenable to fertility preservation treatment.
本研究旨在阐明子宫内膜癌发生过程中 DNA 甲基化改变的意义。使用 Infinium MethylationEPIC BeadChip 和 Ion AmpliSeq Cancer Hotspot Panel v2 分别对 31 例无子宫内膜癌患者的正常对照子宫内膜组织和 81 例子宫内膜癌组织进行全基因组 DNA 甲基化分析和肿瘤相关基因靶向测序。主成分分析显示,肿瘤样本的 DNA 甲基化谱与对照样本不同。基因本体富集分析显示,早发性子宫内膜样癌(EE)组织(患者年龄≤40 岁)和晚发性子宫内膜样癌(LE)组织之间有 1034 个 CpG 位点的 DNA 甲基化存在显著差异,这些差异主要集中在“转录因子”中。CTNNB1 基因突变或参与 Wnt 信号通路的基因 DNA 甲基化改变在 EEs 中较为常见,而 FGFR 信号通路基因的遗传和表观遗传改变则在 LEs 中观察到。无监督层次聚类将 EE 样本分为 Cluster EA(n=22)和 Cluster EB(n=12)。临床病理侵袭性较低的肿瘤倾向于聚集在 Cluster EB 中,包括 HOXA9、HOXD10 和 SOX11 在内的 18 个基因的 DNA 甲基化水平与两个聚类之间的这种侵袭性差异相关。我们鉴定了 11 个区分 EB 样本和 EA 样本的标记 CpG 位点,具有 100%的敏感性和特异性。这些数据表明,遗传和表观遗传上不同的途径可能参与 EE 和 LE 的发生,DNA 甲基化谱分析可能有助于预测侵袭性较低、适合保留生育能力治疗的肿瘤。