Ansari Umair H, Wong Eugene, Smith Murray, Singh Narinder, Palme Carsten E, Smith Mark C, Riffat Faruque
Department of Maxillofacial Surgery, Westmead Public Hospital, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia.
Department of Otolaryngology, Westmead Public Hospital, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia.
Head Neck. 2019 Jul;41(7):2430-2440. doi: 10.1002/hed.25724. Epub 2019 Mar 9.
This meta-analysis describes the validity of narrow band imaging (NBI) in the assessment of suspicious oral lesions.
Medline, EMBASE, and Scopus were searched for trial studies comparing NBI with conventional modalities in the oral cavity (OC) and oropharynx (OP) for the detection of dysplastic and malignant change.
Seven studies were found, and generally supported the utility of NBI in different clinical settings, although there were exceptions. Pooled data from 4 studies of NBI validity demonstrated high summary specificity and sensitivity for a wide range of suspicious lesions of the OC or OP (75.7% with 95% CI 65.1%-83.9%, and 91.5% with 95% CI 81.8%-96.3%, respectively). Summary positive likelihood ratio (LR+) was 8.91 (95% CI 4.1-19.6) and 0.27 (95% CI 0.18-0.39), respectively.
NBI is a promising diagnostic and surveillance tool for suspicious lesions in the OC or OP; however, higher powered studies will define precise NBI criterion and clinical recommendations.
本荟萃分析描述了窄带成像(NBI)在评估可疑口腔病变中的有效性。
检索了Medline、EMBASE和Scopus数据库,以查找在口腔(OC)和口咽(OP)中比较NBI与传统方法检测发育异常和恶性病变的试验研究。
共找到7项研究,总体上支持NBI在不同临床环境中的实用性,不过也有例外情况。来自4项关于NBI有效性研究的汇总数据显示,对于OC或OP的多种可疑病变,汇总特异性和敏感性较高(分别为75.7%,95%置信区间65.1%-83.9%;以及91.5%,95%置信区间81.8%-96.3%)。汇总阳性似然比(LR+)分别为8.91(95%置信区间4.1-19.6)和0.27(95%置信区间0.18-0.39)。
NBI是用于OC或OP可疑病变的一种有前景的诊断和监测工具;然而,需要更有说服力的研究来确定精确的NBI标准和临床建议。