Department of Pharmacy Practice, College of Pharmacy, Purdue University, Indianapolis, Ind; Department of Medicine, School of Medicine, Indiana University, Indianapolis, Ind.
Department of Pharmacy Practice, College of Pharmacy, Purdue University, Indianapolis, Ind.
J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 2019 Jul;158(1):301-310.e1. doi: 10.1016/j.jtcvs.2019.01.095. Epub 2019 Feb 5.
Atrial fibrillation (AF) is a common complication after esophagectomy and is associated with symptoms, hemodynamic instability, prolonged hospital stay, and an increased incidence of mortality. Our objective was to determine the efficacy and safety of intravenous amiodarone for prophylaxis of postesophagectomy AF.
In this retrospective cohort study, 309 patients who underwent esophagectomy formed the initial cohort. Following propensity score-matching, 110 patients who received prophylactic amiodarone 43.75 mg/hour via continuous intravenous infusion over 96 hours (total dose, 4200 mg) were matched to a control group of patients who did not undergo amiodarone prophylaxis (n = 110). The propensity score was obtained using a multivariate logistic regression model with amiodarone as the variable and the following covariates: age, sex, surgical approach, history of neoadjuvant chemotherapy and/or radiation, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, heart failure, cardiovascular disease, alcohol use (>7 drinks/week), preadmission β-blockers discontinued during hospitalization, preoperative use of angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitors or angiotensin receptor blockers, preoperative use of corticosteroids, postoperative use of angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitors or angiotensin receptor blockers, postoperative use of corticosteroids, postoperative use of statins, and preoperative Charlson comorbidity index.
The incidence of AF requiring treatment due to rapid ventricular rate and symptoms was lower in the amiodarone group (17 out of 110 [15.5%] vs 32 out of 110 [29.1%]; odds ratio, 0.45; 95% confidence interval, 0.23-0.86; P = .015). There were no significant differences between the groups in median postoperative length of hospital stay, incidence of pulmonary complications, or mortality. The incidences of hypotension requiring treatment (42.7% vs 21.8%; P = .001), bradycardia (8.2% vs 0.0%; P = .002), and corrected QT interval prolongation (10.9% vs 0.0%; P ≤ .0001) were significantly higher in the amiodarone group.
Prophylactic intravenous amiodarone is associated with a reduction in the incidence of AF following esophagectomy, but is not associated with shorter postoperative length of hospital stay. Intravenous amiodarone for prophylaxis of postesophagectomy AF is associated with hypotension, bradycardia, and corrected QT interval prolongation.
心房颤动(AF)是食管切除术后的常见并发症,与症状、血流动力学不稳定、住院时间延长和死亡率增加有关。我们的目的是确定静脉用胺碘酮预防食管切除术后 AF 的疗效和安全性。
在这项回顾性队列研究中,309 名接受食管切除术的患者构成了初始队列。通过倾向评分匹配,110 名接受 43.75mg/h 持续静脉输注胺碘酮 96 小时(总剂量 4200mg)的预防性胺碘酮治疗的患者与未接受胺碘酮预防的 110 名患者(对照组)相匹配。使用多变量逻辑回归模型获得倾向评分,将胺碘酮作为变量,以下协变量:年龄、性别、手术途径、新辅助化疗和/或放疗史、慢性阻塞性肺疾病、心力衰竭、心血管疾病、酒精使用(>7 份/周)、住院期间停用术前β受体阻滞剂、术前使用血管紧张素转换酶抑制剂或血管紧张素受体阻滞剂、术前使用皮质类固醇、术后使用血管紧张素转换酶抑制剂或血管紧张素受体阻滞剂、术后使用皮质类固醇、术后使用他汀类药物和术前 Charlson 合并症指数。
胺碘酮组因快速心室率和症状需要治疗的 AF 发生率较低(110 例中有 17 例[15.5%] vs. 110 例中有 32 例[29.1%];比值比,0.45;95%置信区间,0.23-0.86;P=0.015)。两组患者的中位术后住院时间、肺部并发症发生率或死亡率无显著差异。胺碘酮组低血压需要治疗的发生率(42.7% vs. 21.8%;P=0.001)、心动过缓(8.2% vs. 0.0%;P=0.002)和校正 QT 间期延长(10.9% vs. 0.0%;P≤0.0001)显著升高。
预防性静脉用胺碘酮可降低食管切除术后 AF 的发生率,但与术后住院时间缩短无关。静脉用胺碘酮预防食管切除术后 AF 与低血压、心动过缓、校正 QT 间期延长有关。