Sörman Daniel Eriksson, Hansson Patrik, Ljungberg Jessica Körning
Department of Psychology, Umeå University, Umeå, Sweden.
Front Psychol. 2019 Feb 11;10:269. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2019.00269. eCollection 2019.
The notion that the long-term practice of managing two languages is beneficial for the executive control system is an ongoing debate. Criticism have been raised that studies demonstrating a bilingual advantage often suffer from small sample sizes, and do not control for fluid intelligence as a possible confound. Taking those suggested factors into account, focusing on older bilingual age groups and investigating the potential effects of linguistic distances, this study aimed to improve the interpretations of the bilinguals' advantages. Measures of inhibition (Flanker, Stroop, Simon task) and switching (Number-letter, Color-Shape, Local-global task) were collected in participants in the ages 50-75 years ( = 193). Despite a large study sample, results did not support any beneficial effects related to improve processing costs in executive functioning. Sub-analyses of the two different language groups (Swedish-Finnish / Swedish-English) intended to investigate the effect of linguistic distances did not change this outcome. Future studies exploring the potential long-term term effects of bilingualism would benefit from identifying tests of cognitive control with greater ecological validity and include other measures of cognitive functioning. Language learning interventions may also be a promising tool for future research.
长期进行两种语言管理对执行控制系统有益这一观点仍在持续争论中。有人批评称,那些证明双语优势的研究往往样本量小,且未将流体智力作为可能的混淆因素加以控制。考虑到这些因素,本研究聚焦于年龄较大的双语群体,并调查语言距离的潜在影响,旨在改进对双语优势的解读。对50至75岁的193名参与者进行了抑制(侧翼干扰、斯特鲁普、西蒙任务)和转换(数字-字母、颜色-形状、局部-全局任务)测量。尽管样本量很大,但结果并不支持与执行功能中处理成本改善相关的任何有益影响。对两个不同语言组(瑞典语-芬兰语/瑞典语-英语)进行的亚分析旨在研究语言距离的影响,但并未改变这一结果。未来探索双语潜在长期影响的研究,若能确定具有更高生态效度的认知控制测试,并纳入其他认知功能测量指标,将大有裨益。语言学习干预也可能是未来研究的一个有前景的工具。