Tetreault Hannah M, Grover Sajjan, Scully Erin D, Gries Tammy, Palmer Nathan A, Sarath Gautam, Louis Joe, Sattler Scott E
Wheat, Sorghum and Forage Research Unit, USDA-ARS, Lincoln, NE, United States.
Department of Agronomy and Horticulture, University of Nebraska-Lincoln, Lincoln, NE, United States.
Front Plant Sci. 2019 Feb 22;10:145. doi: 10.3389/fpls.2019.00145. eCollection 2019.
The sugarcane aphid () has emerged as a significant pest for sorghum. The use of sugarcane aphid-resistant sorghum germplasm with integrated pest management strategies appears to be an excellent solution to this problem. In this study, a resistant line (RTx2783) and a susceptible line (A/BCK60) were used to characterize the differences in plant responses to the sugarcane aphid through a series of experiments, which examined global sorghum gene expression, aphid feeding behavior and inheritance of aphid resistance. The global transcriptomic responses to sugarcane aphids in resistant and susceptible plants were identified using RNA-seq and compared to the expression profiles of uninfested plants at 5, 10, and 15 days post-infestation. The expression of genes from several functional categories were altered in aphid-infested susceptible plants, which included genes related to cell wall modification, photosynthesis and phytohormone biosynthesis. In the resistant line, only 31 genes were differentially expressed in the infested plants relative to uninfested plants over the same timecourse. However, network analysis of these transcriptomes identified a co-expression module where the expression of multiple sugar and starch associated genes were repressed in infested resistant plants at 5 and 10 days. Several nucleotide-binding-site, leucine-rich repeat (NBS-LRR) and disease resistance genes similar to aphid resistance genes identified in other plants are identified in the current study which may be involved in sugarcane aphid resistance. The electrical penetration graph (EPG) results indicated that sugarcane aphid spent approximately twice as long in non-probing phase, and approximately a quarter of time in phloem ingestion phase on the resistant and F plants compared to susceptible plant. Additionally, network analysis identified a phloem protein 2 gene expressed in both susceptible and resistant plants early (day 5) of infestation, which may contribute to defense against aphid feeding within sieve elements. The resistant line RTx2783 displayed both antixenosis and antibiosis modes of resistance based on EPG and choice bioassays between susceptible, resistant and F plants. Aphid resistance from RTx2783 segregated as a single dominant locus in the F generation, which will enable breeders to rapidly develop sugarcane aphid-resistant hybrids using RTx2783 as the male parent.
甘蔗蚜已成为高粱的一种重要害虫。将抗甘蔗蚜高粱种质与综合虫害管理策略相结合似乎是解决这一问题的绝佳办法。在本研究中,通过一系列实验,使用一个抗性品系(RTx2783)和一个感病品系(A/BCK60)来表征高粱植株对甘蔗蚜反应的差异,这些实验检测了高粱的整体基因表达、蚜虫取食行为以及蚜虫抗性的遗传。利用RNA测序确定了抗性和感病植株对甘蔗蚜的整体转录组反应,并将其与未受侵染植株在侵染后5天、10天和15天的表达谱进行比较。在受蚜虫侵染的感病植株中,几个功能类别的基因表达发生了改变,其中包括与细胞壁修饰、光合作用和植物激素生物合成相关的基因。在抗性品系中,在相同的时间进程内,相对于未受侵染的植株,受侵染植株中只有31个基因表达存在差异。然而,对这些转录组的网络分析确定了一个共表达模块,在侵染后5天和10天,多个与糖和淀粉相关的基因在受侵染的抗性植株中的表达受到抑制。在本研究中鉴定出了几个核苷酸结合位点、富含亮氨酸重复序列(NBS-LRR)以及与其他植物中鉴定出的蚜虫抗性基因相似的抗病基因,它们可能参与了对甘蔗蚜的抗性。刺探电位图谱(EPG)结果表明,与感病植株相比,甘蔗蚜在抗性植株和F植株上的非刺探阶段停留时间约为两倍,而在韧皮部取食阶段的时间约为四分之一。此外,网络分析确定了一个在侵染早期(第5天)在感病和抗性植株中均表达的韧皮部蛋白2基因,它可能有助于抵御筛管内蚜虫的取食。基于EPG以及感病、抗性和F植株之间的选择生物测定,抗性品系RTx2783表现出抗生性和抗选择性两种抗性模式。RTx2783的蚜虫抗性在F代中作为一个单显性位点分离,这将使育种者能够以RTx2783作为父本快速培育抗甘蔗蚜杂交种。