Department of Epidemiology and Biostatistics, Western University, London, ON, Canada.
Department of Critical Care Medicine, Cumming School of Medicine, University of Calgary, Calgary, AB, Canada.
Crit Care Med. 2019 Apr;47(4):e286-e291. doi: 10.1097/CCM.0000000000003625.
Critical care medicine is a medical specialty where women remain underrepresented relative to men. The purpose of this study was to explore perceived drivers (i.e., influencing factors) and implications (i.e., associated consequences) of gender inequity in critical care medicine and determine strategies to attract and retain women.
Qualitative interview-based study.
We recruited participants from the 13 Canadian Universities with adult critical care medicine training programs.
We invited all faculty members (clinical and academic) and trainees to participate in a semistructured telephone interview and purposely aimed to recruit two faculty members (one woman and one man) and one trainee from each site. Interviews were transcribed verbatim, and two investigators conducted thematic analysis.
Not applicable.
Three-hundred seventy-one faculty members (20% women, 80% men) and 105 trainees (28% women, 72% men) were invited to participate, 48 participants were required to achieve saturation. Participants unanimously described critical care medicine as a specialty practiced predominantly by men. Most women described experiences of being personally or professionally impacted by gender inequity in their group. Postulated drivers of the gender gap included institutional and interpersonal factors. Mentorship programs that span institutions, targeted policies to support family planning, and opportunities for modified role descriptions were common strategies suggested to attract and retain women.
Participants identified a gender gap in critical care medicine and provided important insight into the impact for personal, professional, and group dynamics. Recommended improvement strategies are feasible, map broadly onto reported drivers and implications, and are applicable to critical care medicine and more broadly throughout medical specialties.
重症医学是一个女性相对于男性代表性不足的医学专业。本研究旨在探讨重症医学中性别不平等的感知驱动因素(即影响因素)和影响(即相关后果),并确定吸引和留住女性的策略。
基于定性访谈的研究。
我们从 13 个拥有成人重症医学培训项目的加拿大大学招募参与者。
我们邀请所有的教职员工(临床和学术)和学员参加半结构化电话访谈,并有意从每个地点招募两名教职员工(一名女性和一名男性)和一名学员。访谈记录逐字转录,两名研究人员进行主题分析。
不适用。
371 名教职员工(20%女性,80%男性)和 105 名学员(28%女性,72%男性)受邀参加,需要 48 名参与者才能达到饱和。参与者一致认为重症医学是一个主要由男性实践的专业。大多数女性描述了自己在群体中经历的性别不平等对个人和职业的影响。性别差距的潜在驱动因素包括机构和人际因素。跨越机构的导师计划、支持计划生育的针对性政策以及修改角色描述的机会是吸引和留住女性的常见策略。
参与者确定了重症医学中的性别差距,并深入了解了对个人、专业和群体动态的影响。建议的改进策略是可行的,广泛映射到报告的驱动因素和影响,并适用于重症医学以及更广泛的医学专业。