Craswell P W, Price J, Boyle P D, Heazlewood V J, Baddeley H, Lloyd H M, Thomas B J, Thomas B W, Williams G M
Aust N Z J Med. 1986 Feb;16(1):11-9. doi: 10.1111/j.1445-5994.1986.tb01107.x.
Indices of past lead absorption were measured and compared in patients with chronic renal failure from many causes, including some with chronic lead nephropathy. X-ray fluorescence (XRF) yielded finger bone lead concentrations by a new in vivo method. These correlated significantly with excess urinary lead following calcium di-sodium EDTA (ethylenediamine tetra-acetate) and erythrocyte lead concentration. Discriminant function analysis demonstrated that the patients in the study could be separated into two groups without any reference to the EDTA lead excretion test using the following variables, all of which contributed significantly to the discrimination. In order of importance, these were: a childhood history of acute lead poisoning, a history of gout, a family history of gout and detectable XRF finger bone lead. Although the XRF finger bone lead measurement is convenient and non-invasive, its lack of sensitivity (48%) limits its usefulness as a screening test for chronic lead nephropathy.
对多种病因所致慢性肾衰竭患者(包括一些慢性铅肾病患者)的既往铅吸收指标进行了测量和比较。X射线荧光分析法(XRF)通过一种新的体内方法得出指骨铅浓度。这些浓度与依地酸二钠钙(乙二胺四乙酸)驱铅后尿铅过量及红细胞铅浓度显著相关。判别函数分析表明,使用以下变量,研究中的患者可分为两组,且无需参考依地酸二钠钙铅排泄试验,所有这些变量对判别均有显著贡献。按重要性排序,这些变量依次为:儿童期急性铅中毒病史、痛风病史、痛风家族史以及可检测到的X射线荧光分析法指骨铅。尽管X射线荧光分析法测量指骨铅便捷且无创,但其灵敏度不足(48%)限制了其作为慢性铅肾病筛查试验的效用。