Department of Sociology, Pennsylvania State University, 211 Oswald Tower, University Park, PA 16801, USA.
Soc Sci Res. 2019 Mar;79:247-257. doi: 10.1016/j.ssresearch.2018.10.012. Epub 2018 Oct 25.
In this study, the analysis examines how variations in parental influence shape private school enrollment among children in blended families. The results show that investment in private schooling for children is higher in families with notable parental income differences than in families with parents with similar incomes. Net of these factors, however, parents in nuclear families are more likely to invest in the provision of private schooling compared to parents in blended families. In blended families, the analysis underscores the significance of two dimensions of biological relatedness for developing nuanced understandings of inequalities among children. On average, parents in these families make greater investments in the provision of private schooling for their shared biological children than for their stepchildren, broadly defined. Disaggregating stepchildren based on their own biological ties with parents, however, reveals substantially higher investments in private schooling for stepchildren biologically related to household heads than for either shared biological children or other stepchildren. The advantage of stepchildren with biological ties to household heads is more pronounced in families where household heads earn more than their spouses. However, it remains statistically significant even when the opposite is true.
在这项研究中,分析考察了父母影响的变化如何塑造混合家庭中儿童的私立学校入学率。结果表明,在父母收入差异显著的家庭中,为孩子投资私立学校的比例高于父母收入相似的家庭。然而,除去这些因素,与混合家庭的父母相比,核心家庭的父母更有可能投资于私立学校的提供。在混合家庭中,分析强调了生物亲缘关系的两个维度对于深入了解儿童之间的不平等现象的重要性。平均而言,与继子女相比,这些家庭的父母更愿意为他们的亲生子女提供私立学校教育。然而,根据继子女与父母的亲生关系进行细分,与家庭户主有亲生关系的继子女在私立学校的投资要远远高于与户主有共同亲生子女或其他继子女的继子女。在户主收入高于配偶的家庭中,与户主有亲生关系的继子女的优势更为明显。然而,即使情况相反,这种优势仍然具有统计学意义。