• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

难治性抑郁症辅助迷走神经刺激所获得的症状性反应的持久性。

Durability of symptomatic responses obtained with adjunctive vagus nerve stimulation in treatment-resistant depression.

作者信息

Kumar Arun, Bunker Mark T, Aaronson Scott T, Conway Charles R, Rothschild Anthony J, Mordenti Giacomo, Rush Augustus J

机构信息

LivaNova USA PLC, Houston, TX, USA,

Department of Clinical Research, Sheppard Pratt Health System, Baltimore, MD, USA.

出版信息

Neuropsychiatr Dis Treat. 2019 Feb 13;15:457-468. doi: 10.2147/NDT.S196665. eCollection 2019.

DOI:10.2147/NDT.S196665
PMID:30858703
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC6387594/
Abstract

OBJECTIVE

To compare the durations of response achieved with adjunctive vagus nerve stimulation (VNS + TAU) vs treatment as usual (TAU) alone in treatment-resistant depression (TRD) over a 5-year period in the TRD registry.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Data from 271 participants on TAU and 328 participants on VNS + TAU were analyzed. Response was defined as ≥50% decrease in baseline Montgomery-Åsberg Depression Rating Scale (MADRS) score at postbaseline visit and was considered retained until the decrease was <40%. MADRS was obtained quarterly in year 1 and biannually thereafter. Time-to-events were estimated using Kaplan-Meier method and compared using log-rank test. HR was estimated using Cox proportion hazard model.

RESULTS

In the VNS + TAU arm, 62.5% (205/328) of participants had a first response over 5 years compared with 39.9% (108/271) in TAU. The time to first response was significantly shorter for VNS + TAU than for TAU (<0.01). For responders in the first year, median time to relapse from first response was 10.1 months (Q1=4.2, Q3=31.5) for VNS + TAU vs 7.3 months (Q1=3.1, Q3=17.6) for TAU (<0.01). HR=0.6 (95% CI: 0.4, 0.9) revealed a significantly lower chance for relapse in VNS + TAU. Probability of retaining first response for a year was 0.39 (0.27, 0.51) for TAU and 0.47 (0.38, 0.56) for VNS + TAU. Timing of the onset of the response did not impact the durability of the response.

CONCLUSION

VNS therapy added to TAU in severe TRD leads to rapid onset and higher likelihood of response, and a greater durability of the response as compared to TAU alone.

摘要

目的

在难治性抑郁症(TRD)注册研究中,比较5年期间辅助迷走神经刺激(VNS+常规治疗)与单纯常规治疗(TAU)所达到的反应持续时间。

材料与方法

分析了271例接受TAU治疗的参与者和328例接受VNS+TAU治疗的参与者的数据。反应定义为基线后访视时蒙哥马利-Åsberg抑郁评定量表(MADRS)评分较基线下降≥50%,且在下降<40%之前一直视为持续存在。在第1年每季度获取一次MADRS评分,此后每半年获取一次。采用Kaplan-Meier方法估计事件发生时间,并使用对数秩检验进行比较。使用Cox比例风险模型估计风险比(HR)。

结果

在VNS+TAU组中,62.5%(205/328)的参与者在5年内首次出现反应,而TAU组为39.9%(108/271)。VNS+TAU组的首次反应时间明显短于TAU组(<0.01)。对于第1年出现反应的患者,VNS+TAU组从首次反应到复发的中位时间为10.1个月(Q1=4.2,Q3=31.5),而TAU组为7.3个月(Q1=3.1,Q3=17.6)(<0.01)。HR=0.6(95%CI:0.4,0.9)显示VNS+TAU组复发的可能性显著降低。TAU组维持首次反应一年的概率为0.39(0.27,0.51),VNS+TAU组为0.47(0.38,0.56)。反应开始的时间不影响反应的持续时间。

结论

在重度TRD中,VNS治疗联合TAU可导致反应快速出现且反应可能性更高,与单纯TAU相比,反应的持续时间更长。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/6308/6387594/a31fa11bd774/ndt-15-457Fig3.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/6308/6387594/a89a5d500aff/ndt-15-457Fig1.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/6308/6387594/6ff4ec8d4bdd/ndt-15-457Fig2.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/6308/6387594/a31fa11bd774/ndt-15-457Fig3.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/6308/6387594/a89a5d500aff/ndt-15-457Fig1.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/6308/6387594/6ff4ec8d4bdd/ndt-15-457Fig2.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/6308/6387594/a31fa11bd774/ndt-15-457Fig3.jpg

相似文献

1
Durability of symptomatic responses obtained with adjunctive vagus nerve stimulation in treatment-resistant depression.难治性抑郁症辅助迷走神经刺激所获得的症状性反应的持久性。
Neuropsychiatr Dis Treat. 2019 Feb 13;15:457-468. doi: 10.2147/NDT.S196665. eCollection 2019.
2
The effects of vagus nerve stimulation on the course and outcomes of patients with bipolar disorder in a treatment-resistant depressive episode: a 5-year prospective registry.迷走神经刺激对双相情感障碍难治性抑郁发作患者病程及结局的影响:一项5年前瞻性登记研究
Int J Bipolar Disord. 2020 May 2;8(1):13. doi: 10.1186/s40345-020-0178-4.
3
Chronic Vagus Nerve Stimulation Significantly Improves Quality of Life in Treatment-Resistant Major Depression.慢性迷走神经刺激显著改善治疗抵抗性重度抑郁症患者的生活质量。
J Clin Psychiatry. 2018 Aug 21;79(5):18m12178. doi: 10.4088/JCP.18m12178.
4
A patient-level meta-analysis of studies evaluating vagus nerve stimulation therapy for treatment-resistant depression.一项针对评估迷走神经刺激疗法治疗难治性抑郁症的研究的患者水平荟萃分析。
Med Devices (Auckl). 2013;6:17-35. doi: 10.2147/MDER.S41017. Epub 2013 Mar 1.
5
A 5-Year Observational Study of Patients With Treatment-Resistant Depression Treated With Vagus Nerve Stimulation or Treatment as Usual: Comparison of Response, Remission, and Suicidality.一项针对接受迷走神经刺激或常规治疗的治疗抵抗性抑郁症患者的 5 年观察性研究:反应、缓解和自杀率的比较。
Am J Psychiatry. 2017 Jul 1;174(7):640-648. doi: 10.1176/appi.ajp.2017.16010034. Epub 2017 Mar 31.
6
A one-year comparison of vagus nerve stimulation with treatment as usual for treatment-resistant depression.迷走神经刺激与常规治疗对难治性抑郁症的一年期比较。
Biol Psychiatry. 2005 Sep 1;58(5):364-73. doi: 10.1016/j.biopsych.2005.07.028.
7
Vagus nerve stimulation as adjunctive therapy in patients with difficult-to-treat depression (RESTORE-LIFE): study protocol design and rationale of a real-world post-market study.迷走神经刺激作为难治性抑郁症患者的辅助治疗(RESTORE-LIFE):真实世界上市后研究的研究方案设计和理论基础。
BMC Psychiatry. 2020 Sep 29;20(1):471. doi: 10.1186/s12888-020-02869-6.
8
Vagus nerve stimulation: An update on a novel treatment for treatment-resistant depression.迷走神经刺激术:一种治疗难治性抑郁症的新疗法的最新进展。
J Neurol Sci. 2022 Mar 15;434:120171. doi: 10.1016/j.jns.2022.120171. Epub 2022 Jan 29.
9
Rapid titration protocol - Experiences with a dynamic novel titration regime for vagus nerve stimulation in a group of depressive patients.快速滴定方案 - 一组抑郁患者中使用新型动态滴定方案对迷走神经刺激的经验。
J Clin Neurosci. 2020 Apr;74:262-264. doi: 10.1016/j.jocn.2019.08.071. Epub 2019 Aug 22.
10
Vagus nerve stimulation (VNS) therapy in patients with treatment resistant depression: A systematic review and meta-analysis.难治性抑郁症患者的迷走神经刺激(VNS)疗法:一项系统评价和荟萃分析。
Compr Psychiatry. 2019 Dec 12;98:152156. doi: 10.1016/j.comppsych.2019.152156.

引用本文的文献

1
Left and right vagus nerve stimulation: historical perspectives, clinical efficacy, and future directions.左右迷走神经刺激:历史回顾、临床疗效及未来方向。
Front Hum Neurosci. 2025 Jul 29;19:1609654. doi: 10.3389/fnhum.2025.1609654. eCollection 2025.
2
Therapeutic Approaches to Tackle the Challenge of Depression That Is Resistant to Treatment-A Narrative Review.应对难治性抑郁症挑战的治疗方法——一项叙述性综述
Health Sci Rep. 2025 Jan 22;8(1):e70370. doi: 10.1002/hsr2.70370. eCollection 2025 Jan.
3
Vagus nerve stimulation in dementia: A scoping review of clinical and pre-clinical studies.

本文引用的文献

1
Chronic Vagus Nerve Stimulation Significantly Improves Quality of Life in Treatment-Resistant Major Depression.慢性迷走神经刺激显著改善治疗抵抗性重度抑郁症患者的生活质量。
J Clin Psychiatry. 2018 Aug 21;79(5):18m12178. doi: 10.4088/JCP.18m12178.
2
A 5-Year Observational Study of Patients With Treatment-Resistant Depression Treated With Vagus Nerve Stimulation or Treatment as Usual: Comparison of Response, Remission, and Suicidality.一项针对接受迷走神经刺激或常规治疗的治疗抵抗性抑郁症患者的 5 年观察性研究:反应、缓解和自杀率的比较。
Am J Psychiatry. 2017 Jul 1;174(7):640-648. doi: 10.1176/appi.ajp.2017.16010034. Epub 2017 Mar 31.
3
痴呆症中的迷走神经刺激:临床和临床前研究的范围综述
AIMS Neurosci. 2024 Sep 27;11(3):398-420. doi: 10.3934/Neuroscience.2024024. eCollection 2024.
4
Invasive Neuromodulation Techniques for Treatment-Resistant Depression.用于治疗抵抗性抑郁症的侵入性神经调节技术
Curr Top Behav Neurosci. 2024;66:297-311. doi: 10.1007/7854_2023_460.
5
Treatment-resistant depression: definition, prevalence, detection, management, and investigational interventions.难治性抑郁症:定义、患病率、检测、管理及研究性干预措施。
World Psychiatry. 2023 Oct;22(3):394-412. doi: 10.1002/wps.21120.
6
Depression as a cardiovascular disorder: central-autonomic network, brain-heart axis, and vagal perspectives of low mood.抑郁症作为一种心血管疾病:中枢自主神经网络、脑-心轴以及情绪低落的迷走神经视角
Front Netw Physiol. 2023 May 16;3:1125495. doi: 10.3389/fnetp.2023.1125495. eCollection 2023.
7
USP10 is a potential mediator for vagus nerve stimulation to alleviate neuroinflammation in ischaemic stroke by inhibiting NF-κB signalling pathway.USP10 是迷走神经刺激缓解缺血性脑卒中神经炎症的潜在介质,其作用机制可能是通过抑制 NF-κB 信号通路。
Front Immunol. 2023 Apr 20;14:1130697. doi: 10.3389/fimmu.2023.1130697. eCollection 2023.
8
Alternative metrics for characterizing longer-term clinical outcomes in difficult-to-treat depression: I. Association with change in quality of life.用于表征难治性抑郁症长期临床结局的替代指标:I. 与生活质量变化的关联
Psychol Med. 2023 Oct;53(14):6511-6523. doi: 10.1017/S0033291722003798. Epub 2023 Jan 5.
9
A narrative review on invasive brain stimulation for treatment-resistant depression.一篇关于脑深部刺激治疗难治性抑郁症的叙述性综述。
Braz J Psychiatry. 2022 May-Jun;44(3):317-330. doi: 10.1590/1516-4446-2021-1874.
10
A systematic review of magnetic resonance imaging in patients with an implanted vagus nerve stimulation system.植入式迷走神经刺激系统患者的磁共振成像系统评价的系统性综述。
Neuroradiology. 2021 Sep;63(9):1407-1417. doi: 10.1007/s00234-021-02705-y. Epub 2021 Apr 12.
A patient-level meta-analysis of studies evaluating vagus nerve stimulation therapy for treatment-resistant depression.
一项针对评估迷走神经刺激疗法治疗难治性抑郁症的研究的患者水平荟萃分析。
Med Devices (Auckl). 2013;6:17-35. doi: 10.2147/MDER.S41017. Epub 2013 Mar 1.
4
Mortality and suicide risk in treatment-resistant depression: an observational study of the long-term impact of intervention.治疗抵抗性抑郁症的死亡率和自杀风险:干预长期影响的观察性研究。
PLoS One. 2012;7(10):e48002. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0048002. Epub 2012 Oct 25.
5
Vagus nerve stimulation therapy randomized to different amounts of electrical charge for treatment-resistant depression: acute and chronic effects.迷走神经刺激疗法随机分为不同电量治疗难治性抑郁症:急性和慢性效果。
Brain Stimul. 2013 Jul;6(4):631-40. doi: 10.1016/j.brs.2012.09.013. Epub 2012 Oct 23.
6
Durability of antidepressant response to vagus nerve stimulation (VNS).迷走神经刺激(VNS)抗抑郁反应的持久性。
Int J Neuropsychopharmacol. 2007 Dec;10(6):817-26. doi: 10.1017/S1461145706007425. Epub 2007 Feb 9.
7
Acute and longer-term outcomes in depressed outpatients requiring one or several treatment steps: a STAR*D report.需要一个或多个治疗步骤的抑郁症门诊患者的急性和长期转归:STAR*D报告
Am J Psychiatry. 2006 Nov;163(11):1905-17. doi: 10.1176/ajp.2006.163.11.1905.
8
Report by the ACNP Task Force on response and remission in major depressive disorder.美国神经精神药理学院(ACNP)关于重度抑郁症反应与缓解的特别工作组报告。
Neuropsychopharmacology. 2006 Sep;31(9):1841-53. doi: 10.1038/sj.npp.1301131. Epub 2006 Jun 21.
9
Two-year outcome of vagus nerve stimulation (VNS) for treatment of major depressive episodes.迷走神经刺激(VNS)治疗重度抑郁发作的两年疗效
J Clin Psychiatry. 2005 Sep;66(9):1097-104. doi: 10.4088/jcp.v66n0902.
10
A one-year comparison of vagus nerve stimulation with treatment as usual for treatment-resistant depression.迷走神经刺激与常规治疗对难治性抑郁症的一年期比较。
Biol Psychiatry. 2005 Sep 1;58(5):364-73. doi: 10.1016/j.biopsych.2005.07.028.