Liu Yun, Li Feng, Luo Hansheng, He Qiuguang, Chen Lifen, Cheng Yuan, Zhang Wenbin, Xie Zongyi
Department of Neurosurgery, The Second Affiliated Hospital, Chongqing Medical University, Chongqing, China.
Department of Neurology, The Second Affiliated Hospital, Chongqing Medical University, Chongqing, China.
Front Neurol. 2019 Feb 25;10:151. doi: 10.3389/fneur.2019.00151. eCollection 2019.
Deep brain stimulation (DBS) of the subthalamic nucleus (STN) or globus pallidus internus (GPi) have been proven to be equally effective in improving motor-symptoms for advanced Parkinson's disease (PD) patients. However, it is unclear that which target stimulation is more effective in reducing dyskinesia. We conducted the meta-analysis to evaluate the efficacy of STN and GPi-DBS in the dyskinesia. A systematic search was performed in PubMed, Embase, and the Cochrane Library databases. Controlled trials about the dyskinesia comparing the efficacy of GPi and STN DBS were included. Clinical data of dyskinesia and levodopa equivalent doses (LED) were collected for the meta-analysis. Eight eligible trials containing a total of 822 patients were included in this meta-analysis. Our results showed that GPi DBS offered a greater reduction of dyskinesia than STN DBS at 12 months after surgery, with an overall pooled SMD of 0.32 (95% CI = 0.06 to 0.59, = 0.02). Treatment of STN DBS was associated with a greater reduction of LED compared with GPi DBS, with a change score of -320.55 (95% CI = -401.36 to -239.73, < 0.00001). GPi DBS is superior to reduce dyskinesia than STN DBS at 12 months after surgery for advanced PD patients. Further studies should focus on the different mechanism for dyskinesia reduction by GPi or STN DBS.
对丘脑底核(STN)或苍白球内侧部(GPi)进行深部脑刺激(DBS)已被证明对晚期帕金森病(PD)患者改善运动症状同样有效。然而,尚不清楚哪种靶点刺激在减轻异动症方面更有效。我们进行了荟萃分析以评估STN和GPi-DBS治疗异动症的疗效。在PubMed、Embase和Cochrane图书馆数据库中进行了系统检索。纳入了比较GPi和STN DBS疗效的关于异动症的对照试验。收集异动症的临床数据和左旋多巴等效剂量(LED)用于荟萃分析。本荟萃分析纳入了八项符合条件的试验,共822例患者。我们的结果显示,术后12个月时,GPi DBS比STN DBS能更大程度地减轻异动症,总体合并标准化均数差(SMD)为0.32(95%置信区间=0.06至0.59,P=0.02)。与GPi DBS相比,STN DBS治疗使LED的降低幅度更大,变化评分为-320.55(95%置信区间=-401.36至-239.73,P<0.00001)。对于晚期PD患者,术后12个月时,GPi DBS在减轻异动症方面优于STN DBS。进一步的研究应聚焦于GPi或STN DBS减轻异动症的不同机制。