Suppr超能文献

对伴有或不伴有声带沟的声带萎缩患者进行双侧试验性声带透明质酸注射。

Bilateral trial vocal fold injection with hyaluronic acid in patients with vocal fold atrophy with or without sulcus.

作者信息

van den Broek Emke M J M, Heijnen Bas J, Hendriksma Martine, Langeveld Antonius P M, van Benthem Peter Paul G, Sjögren Elisabeth V

机构信息

Department of Otorhinolaryngology/Head and Neck Surgery, Leiden University Medical Centre, Albinusdreef 2, PO-Box 9600, 2300 RC, Leiden, The Netherlands.

出版信息

Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol. 2019 May;276(5):1413-1422. doi: 10.1007/s00405-019-05347-2. Epub 2019 Mar 11.

Abstract

PURPOSE

To evaluate the outcome of bilateral trial vocal fold injection (VFI) with hyaluronic acid in patients with vocal fold atrophy ± sulcus and to assess the predictive value of trial VFI on the outcome of durable medialization procedure.

METHODS

Voice data collected according to a standardized protocol before and one month after trial VFI of 68 patients with vocal fold atrophy (30) and atrophy with sulcus (38) were analyzed. Voice Handicap Index (VHI)-30 was compared to the outcome of a durable medialization at 3 and 12 months.

RESULTS

The overall VHI-30 improvement was 16.8 points (from 49.9 to 33.1), which was statistically significant and clinically relevant. 57.8% of the patients experienced enough subjective benefit after trial VFI to undergo durable medialization. Of the patients that experienced subjective benefit 62% had a clinically relevant improvement in VHI-30. There was no relevant change in other parameters and no difference between ± sulcus. After durable medialization 90-94% of the patients had VHI-30 scores similar to or better than post-trial VFI.

CONCLUSION

The majority of patients experience subjective improvement after bilateral trial VFI indicating that medialization is a valid treatment option for patients with vocal fold atrophy ± sulcus. The VHI-30 only partially overlaps with patients' subjective evaluation and does not predict which patients will experience subjective improvement. It is, however, predictive for VHI-30 outcome after durable medialization. The aerodynamic and acoustic parameters showed no relevant change. Further identification of voice assessment parameters accurately reflecting the subjective experience of these patients is warranted.

摘要

目的

评估双侧试验性声带注射透明质酸对声带萎缩±沟患者的治疗效果,并评估试验性声带注射对持久内移手术效果的预测价值。

方法

分析了68例声带萎缩患者(30例)和萎缩伴沟患者(38例)在试验性声带注射前及注射后1个月按照标准化方案收集的嗓音数据。将嗓音障碍指数(VHI)-30与3个月和12个月时持久内移手术的效果进行比较。

结果

VHI-30总体改善了16.8分(从49.9降至33.1),具有统计学意义且临床相关性显著。57.8%的患者在试验性声带注射后获得了足够的主观改善,从而接受了持久内移手术。在获得主观改善的患者中,62%的患者VHI-30有临床相关改善。其他参数无相关变化,±沟患者之间也无差异。持久内移手术后,90%-94%的患者VHI-30评分与试验性声带注射后相似或更好。

结论

大多数患者在双侧试验性声带注射后主观症状改善,表明内移术是声带萎缩±沟患者的有效治疗选择。VHI-30仅部分与患者的主观评估重叠,无法预测哪些患者会有主观改善。然而,它可预测持久内移手术后的VHI-30结果。空气动力学和声学参数无相关变化。有必要进一步确定能准确反映这些患者主观体验的嗓音评估参数。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/99a1/6458982/15bf49c39aad/405_2019_5347_Fig1_HTML.jpg

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验