van den Broek Emke M J M, Heijnen Bas J, Hendriksma Martine, Langeveld Antonius P M, van Benthem Peter Paul G, Sjögren Elisabeth V
Department of Otorhinolaryngology/Head and Neck Surgery, Leiden University Medical Centre, Albinusdreef 2, PO-Box 9600, 2300 RC, Leiden, The Netherlands.
Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol. 2019 May;276(5):1413-1422. doi: 10.1007/s00405-019-05347-2. Epub 2019 Mar 11.
To evaluate the outcome of bilateral trial vocal fold injection (VFI) with hyaluronic acid in patients with vocal fold atrophy ± sulcus and to assess the predictive value of trial VFI on the outcome of durable medialization procedure.
Voice data collected according to a standardized protocol before and one month after trial VFI of 68 patients with vocal fold atrophy (30) and atrophy with sulcus (38) were analyzed. Voice Handicap Index (VHI)-30 was compared to the outcome of a durable medialization at 3 and 12 months.
The overall VHI-30 improvement was 16.8 points (from 49.9 to 33.1), which was statistically significant and clinically relevant. 57.8% of the patients experienced enough subjective benefit after trial VFI to undergo durable medialization. Of the patients that experienced subjective benefit 62% had a clinically relevant improvement in VHI-30. There was no relevant change in other parameters and no difference between ± sulcus. After durable medialization 90-94% of the patients had VHI-30 scores similar to or better than post-trial VFI.
The majority of patients experience subjective improvement after bilateral trial VFI indicating that medialization is a valid treatment option for patients with vocal fold atrophy ± sulcus. The VHI-30 only partially overlaps with patients' subjective evaluation and does not predict which patients will experience subjective improvement. It is, however, predictive for VHI-30 outcome after durable medialization. The aerodynamic and acoustic parameters showed no relevant change. Further identification of voice assessment parameters accurately reflecting the subjective experience of these patients is warranted.
评估双侧试验性声带注射透明质酸对声带萎缩±沟患者的治疗效果,并评估试验性声带注射对持久内移手术效果的预测价值。
分析了68例声带萎缩患者(30例)和萎缩伴沟患者(38例)在试验性声带注射前及注射后1个月按照标准化方案收集的嗓音数据。将嗓音障碍指数(VHI)-30与3个月和12个月时持久内移手术的效果进行比较。
VHI-30总体改善了16.8分(从49.9降至33.1),具有统计学意义且临床相关性显著。57.8%的患者在试验性声带注射后获得了足够的主观改善,从而接受了持久内移手术。在获得主观改善的患者中,62%的患者VHI-30有临床相关改善。其他参数无相关变化,±沟患者之间也无差异。持久内移手术后,90%-94%的患者VHI-30评分与试验性声带注射后相似或更好。
大多数患者在双侧试验性声带注射后主观症状改善,表明内移术是声带萎缩±沟患者的有效治疗选择。VHI-30仅部分与患者的主观评估重叠,无法预测哪些患者会有主观改善。然而,它可预测持久内移手术后的VHI-30结果。空气动力学和声学参数无相关变化。有必要进一步确定能准确反映这些患者主观体验的嗓音评估参数。