Department of Otorhinolaryngology/Head and Neck Surgery, Leiden University Medical Center, Albinusdreef 2, PO-Box 9600, 2300 RC, Leiden, The Netherlands.
Department of Otorhinolaryngology/Head and Neck Surgery, University Medical Center, Utrecht, The Netherlands.
Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol. 2024 Oct;281(10):5061-5074. doi: 10.1007/s00405-024-08751-5. Epub 2024 Jul 18.
Identifying outcome measurements instruments (OMIs) to evaluate treatment efficacy in patients with vocal fold atrophy and/or sulcus.
Systematic review of records published before March 2021 by searching Pubmed and EMBASE. Included studies reported on adults (> 18 year) with dysphonia caused by glottic insufficiency due to vocal fold atrophy with or without sulcus, who were enrolled into a randomized controlled trial, a non-randomized controlled trial, a case-controlled study or a cohort study. All included studies described an intervention with at least one outcome measurement.
A total of 5456 studies were identified. After removing duplicates, screening title and abstract and full text screening of selected records, 34 publications were included in final analysis. From these 50 separate OMIs were recorded and categorized according to the ELS protocol by DeJonckere et al. (Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol 258: 77-82, 2001). With most OMIs being used in multiple studies the total number of OMIs reported was 265. Nineteen (19) individual OMIs accounted for 80% of reports. The most frequently used OMIs according to category were: VHI and VHI-10 (subjective evaluation); G of GRBAS (perceptual evaluation); F0, Jitter and Shimmer (acoustic evaluation); MPT and MFR (aerodynamic evaluation) and glottic closure and mucosal wave (endoscopic evaluation). Of these OMIs VHI had a high percentage of significance of 90%.
This systematic review identifies the most used OMIs in patients with glottic incompetency due to vocal fold atrophy and/or sulcus as a step toward defining a Core Outcome Set (COS) for this population.
确定评估声带萎缩和/或沟状声带病变患者治疗效果的结局测量指标(OMIs)。
系统检索 2021 年 3 月前在 Pubmed 和 EMBASE 上发表的记录,进行文献回顾。纳入的研究报告了因声带萎缩伴或不伴沟状导致声门不全引起的成人(>18 岁)的发音障碍,并被纳入随机对照试验、非随机对照试验、病例对照研究或队列研究。所有纳入的研究均描述了至少一种干预措施和相应的结局测量。
共确定了 5456 项研究。在去除重复项、筛选标题和摘要以及全文筛选后,最终有 34 项研究被纳入分析。从这些研究中记录了 50 种不同的 OMIs,并根据 DeJonckere 等人(Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol 258: 77-82, 2001)的 ELS 方案进行分类。由于大多数 OMIs 在多项研究中使用,因此报告的 OMIs 总数为 265 个。19 个(19)个单独的 OMIs 占报告的 80%。按类别分类,使用最频繁的 OMIs 为:VHI 和 VHI-10(主观评估);GRBAS 的 G(感知评估);F0、Jitter 和 Shimmer(声学评估);MPT 和 MFR(空气动力学评估)和声带闭合和黏膜波(内镜评估)。在这些 OMIs 中,VHI 的显著性百分比高达 90%。
本系统回顾确定了因声带萎缩和/或沟状导致声门不全的患者中使用最频繁的 OMIs,这是为该人群定义核心结局集(COS)的一步。
PROSPERO 注册号:238274。