Tritto Aline C, Bueno Salomão, Rodrigues Rosa M P, Gualano Bruno, Roschel Hamilton, Artioli Guilherme G
Universidade de São Paulo.
Int J Sport Nutr Exerc Metab. 2019 Sep 1;29(5):505-511. doi: 10.1123/ijsnem.2018-0337.
This study evaluated the effects of β-hydroxy-β-methylbutyrate free acid (HMB-FA) and calcium salt (HMB-Ca) on strength, hypertrophy, and markers of muscle damage. In this randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled study, 44 resistance-trained men (age: 26 ± 4 years; body mass: 84.9 ± 12.0 kg) consuming ≥1.7 g·kg-1·day-1 of protein received HMB-FA (3 g/day; n = 14), HMB-Ca (3 g/day; n = 15), or placebo (PL; cornstarch, 3 g/day; n = 15) for 12 weeks, while performing a periodized resistance training program. Before and after intervention, lean body mass (measured with dual X-ray absorptiometry), maximal dynamic strength (one-repetition maximum), knee extension maximal isometric strength (maximal voluntary isometric contraction [MVIC]), cross-sectional area (measured with ultrasound), and muscle soreness were assessed. MVIC was also measured 48 hr after the first and the last training sessions. All groups increased lean body mass (main time effect: p < .0001; HMB-FA: 1.8 ± 1.8 kg; HMB-Ca: 0.8 ± 1.4 kg; PL: 0.9 ± 1.4 kg), cross-sectional area (main time effect: p < .0001; HMB-FA: 6.6 ± 3.8%; HMB-Ca: 4.7 ± 4.4%; PL: 6.9 ± 3.8%), one-repetition maximum bench press (main time effect: p < .0001; HMB-FA: 14.8 ± 8.4 kg; HMB-Ca: 11.8 ± 7.4 kg; PL: 11.2 ± 6.6 kg), MVIC (main time effect: p < .0001; HMB-FA: 34.4 ± 39.3%; HMB-Ca: 32.3 ± 27.4%; PL: 17.7 ± 20.9%) after the intervention, but no differences between groups were shown. HMB-FA group showed greater leg press strength after the intervention than HMB-Ca and PL groups (Group × Time interaction: p < .05; HMB-FA: 47.7 ± 31.2 kg; HMB-Ca: 43.8 ± 31.7 kg; PL: 30.2 ± 20.9 kg). MVIC measured 48 hr after the first and the last sessions showed no attenuation of force decline with supplementation. Muscle soreness following the first and last sessions was not different between groups. The authors concluded that neither HMB-Ca nor HMB-FA improved hypertrophy or reduced muscle damage in resistance-trained men undergoing resistance training ingesting optimal amounts of protein. HMB-FA but not HMB-Ca resulted in a statistically significant yet minor improvement on leg press one-repetition maximum.
本研究评估了β-羟基-β-甲基丁酸游离酸(HMB-FA)和钙盐(HMB-Ca)对力量、肌肉肥大及肌肉损伤标志物的影响。在这项随机、双盲、安慰剂对照研究中,44名进行抗阻训练的男性(年龄:26±4岁;体重:84.9±12.0千克),每日摄入≥1.7克/千克体重的蛋白质,他们被分为三组,分别接受HMB-FA(3克/天;n = 14)、HMB-Ca(3克/天;n = 15)或安慰剂(PL;玉米淀粉,3克/天;n = 15),为期12周,同时进行一个阶段性抗阻训练计划。在干预前后,评估瘦体重(采用双能X线吸收法测量)、最大动态力量(一次重复最大值)、膝关节伸展最大等长力量(最大自主等长收缩[MVIC])、横截面积(采用超声测量)和肌肉酸痛情况。在第一次和最后一次训练课后48小时也测量MVIC。所有组在干预后瘦体重(主要时间效应:p <.0001;HMB-FA组增加1.8±1.8千克;HMB-Ca组增加0.8±1.4千克;PL组增加0.9±1.4千克)、横截面积(主要时间效应:p <.0001;HMB-FA组增加6.6±3.8%;HMB-Ca组增加4.7±4.4%;PL组增加6.9±3.8%)、卧推一次重复最大值(主要时间效应:p <.0001;HMB-FA组增加14.8±8.4千克;HMB-Ca组增加11.8±7.4千克;PL组增加11.2±6.6千克)、MVIC(主要时间效应:p <.0001;HMB-FA组增加34.4±39.3%;HMB-Ca组增加32.3±27.4%;PL组增加17.7±20.9%)均有所增加,但组间无差异。HMB-FA组在干预后腿部推举力量大于HMB-Ca组和PL组(组×时间交互作用:p <.05;HMB-FA组为47.7±31.2千克;HMB-Ca组为43.8±31.7千克;PL组为30.2±20.9千克)。第一次和最后一次训练课后48小时测量的MVIC显示,补充剂并未减弱力量下降。第一次和最后一次训练课后的肌肉酸痛在组间无差异。作者得出结论,对于摄入最佳量蛋白质并进行抗阻训练的男性,HMB-Ca和HMB-FA均未改善肌肉肥大或减少肌肉损伤。HMB-FA而非HMB-Ca在腿部推举一次重复最大值方面导致了具有统计学意义但较小的改善。