Suppr超能文献

β-羟基-β-甲基丁酸的钙盐形式比游离酸形式具有更高的生物利用度。

Superior bioavailability of the calcium salt form of β-hydroxy-β-methylbutyrate compared with the free acid form.

机构信息

Applied Physiology & Nutrition Research Group, University of São Paulo, São Paulo, Brazil.

Rheumatology Division, Faculdade de Medicina, Hospital das Clínicas HCFMUSP, Universidade de São Paulo, São Paulo, Brazil.

出版信息

Amino Acids. 2024 Apr 2;56(1):27. doi: 10.1007/s00726-023-03369-z.

Abstract

We investigated the bioavailability of the calcium salt (HMB-Ca) and the free acid (HMB-FA) forms of β-hydroxy-β-methylbutyrate (HMB). Sixteen young individuals received the following treatments on three different occasions in a counterbalanced crossover fashion: (1) HMB-FA in clear capsules; (2) HMB-Ca in gelatine capsules; (3) HMB-Ca dissolved in water. All treatments provided 1 g of HMB. Blood samples were taken before and on multiple time points following ingestion. The following parameters were calculated: peak plasma (Cmax), time to peak (Tmax), slope of HMB appearance in blood, area under the curve (AUC), half-life time (t) and relative bioavailability (HMB-Ca in water set as reference). All treatments led to rapid and large increases in plasma HMB. HMB-Ca in capsules and in water showed similar plasma HMB values across time (p = 0.438). HMB-FA resulted in lower concentrations vs. the other treatments (both p < 0.001). AUC (HMB-Ca in capsules: 50,078 ± 10,507; HMB-Ca in water: 47,871 ± 10,783; HMB-FA: 29,130 ± 12,946 µmol L × 720 min), Cmax (HMB-Ca in capsules: 229.2 ± 65.9; HMB-Ca in water: 249.7 ± 49.7; HMB-FA: 139.1 ± 67.2 µmol L) and relative bioavailability (HMB-Ca in capsules: 104.8 ± 14.9%; HMB-FA: 61.5 ± 17.0%) were lower in HMB-FA vs. HMB-Ca (all p < 0.001). HMB-Ca in water resulted in the fastest Tmax (43 ± 22 min) compared to HMB-Ca in capsules (79 ± 40 min) and HMB-FA (78 ± 21 min) (all p < 0.05), while t was similar between treatments. To conclude, HMB-Ca exhibited superior bioavailability compared to HMB-FA, with HMB-Ca in water showing faster absorption. Elimination kinetics were similar across all forms, suggesting that the pharmaceutical form of HMB affects the absorption rates, but not its distribution or elimination.

摘要

我们研究了 β-羟基-β-甲基丁酸(HMB)的钙盐(HMB-Ca)和游离酸(HMB-FA)形式的生物利用度。16 名年轻人在平衡交叉的方式下,在三种不同情况下接受了以下三种处理:(1)透明胶囊中的 HMB-FA;(2)明胶胶囊中的 HMB-Ca;(3)溶于水的 HMB-Ca。所有处理均提供 1g 的 HMB。在摄入前后的多个时间点采集血样。计算以下参数:血浆峰值(Cmax)、达峰时间(Tmax)、HMB 在血液中出现的斜率、曲线下面积(AUC)、半衰期(t)和相对生物利用度(以水为参考的 HMB-Ca)。所有处理均导致 HMB 血浆水平迅速大幅升高。胶囊中的 HMB-Ca 和水在整个时间内显示出相似的 HMB 血浆值(p=0.438)。HMB-FA 与其他处理相比,浓度较低(均 p<0.001)。AUC(胶囊中的 HMB-Ca:50078±10507;水中的 HMB-Ca:47871±10783;HMB-FA:29130±12946µmol L×720min)、Cmax(胶囊中的 HMB-Ca:229.2±65.9;水中的 HMB-Ca:249.7±49.7;HMB-FA:139.1±67.2µmol L)和相对生物利用度(胶囊中的 HMB-Ca:104.8±14.9%;HMB-FA:61.5±17.0%)均低于 HMB-Ca(均 p<0.001)。与 HMB-Ca 相比,HMB-FA 的 HMB-Ca 在水中的 Tmax(43±22min)最快,而 HMB-Ca 在胶囊中的 Tmax(79±40min)和 HMB-FA(78±21min)最慢(均 p<0.05),而 t 值在处理之间相似。总之,与 HMB-FA 相比,HMB-Ca 表现出更好的生物利用度,而 HMB-Ca 在水中的吸收速度更快。所有形式的消除动力学相似,表明 HMB 的药物形式影响吸收速度,但不影响其分布或消除。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/1e52/10987370/ff7ae44256c0/726_2023_3369_Fig1_HTML.jpg

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验