Applied Physiology & Nutrition Research Group, University of São Paulo, São Paulo, Brazil.
Rheumatology Division, Faculdade de Medicina, Hospital das Clínicas HCFMUSP, Universidade de São Paulo, São Paulo, Brazil.
Amino Acids. 2024 Apr 2;56(1):27. doi: 10.1007/s00726-023-03369-z.
We investigated the bioavailability of the calcium salt (HMB-Ca) and the free acid (HMB-FA) forms of β-hydroxy-β-methylbutyrate (HMB). Sixteen young individuals received the following treatments on three different occasions in a counterbalanced crossover fashion: (1) HMB-FA in clear capsules; (2) HMB-Ca in gelatine capsules; (3) HMB-Ca dissolved in water. All treatments provided 1 g of HMB. Blood samples were taken before and on multiple time points following ingestion. The following parameters were calculated: peak plasma (Cmax), time to peak (Tmax), slope of HMB appearance in blood, area under the curve (AUC), half-life time (t) and relative bioavailability (HMB-Ca in water set as reference). All treatments led to rapid and large increases in plasma HMB. HMB-Ca in capsules and in water showed similar plasma HMB values across time (p = 0.438). HMB-FA resulted in lower concentrations vs. the other treatments (both p < 0.001). AUC (HMB-Ca in capsules: 50,078 ± 10,507; HMB-Ca in water: 47,871 ± 10,783; HMB-FA: 29,130 ± 12,946 µmol L × 720 min), Cmax (HMB-Ca in capsules: 229.2 ± 65.9; HMB-Ca in water: 249.7 ± 49.7; HMB-FA: 139.1 ± 67.2 µmol L) and relative bioavailability (HMB-Ca in capsules: 104.8 ± 14.9%; HMB-FA: 61.5 ± 17.0%) were lower in HMB-FA vs. HMB-Ca (all p < 0.001). HMB-Ca in water resulted in the fastest Tmax (43 ± 22 min) compared to HMB-Ca in capsules (79 ± 40 min) and HMB-FA (78 ± 21 min) (all p < 0.05), while t was similar between treatments. To conclude, HMB-Ca exhibited superior bioavailability compared to HMB-FA, with HMB-Ca in water showing faster absorption. Elimination kinetics were similar across all forms, suggesting that the pharmaceutical form of HMB affects the absorption rates, but not its distribution or elimination.
我们研究了 β-羟基-β-甲基丁酸(HMB)的钙盐(HMB-Ca)和游离酸(HMB-FA)形式的生物利用度。16 名年轻人在平衡交叉的方式下,在三种不同情况下接受了以下三种处理:(1)透明胶囊中的 HMB-FA;(2)明胶胶囊中的 HMB-Ca;(3)溶于水的 HMB-Ca。所有处理均提供 1g 的 HMB。在摄入前后的多个时间点采集血样。计算以下参数:血浆峰值(Cmax)、达峰时间(Tmax)、HMB 在血液中出现的斜率、曲线下面积(AUC)、半衰期(t)和相对生物利用度(以水为参考的 HMB-Ca)。所有处理均导致 HMB 血浆水平迅速大幅升高。胶囊中的 HMB-Ca 和水在整个时间内显示出相似的 HMB 血浆值(p=0.438)。HMB-FA 与其他处理相比,浓度较低(均 p<0.001)。AUC(胶囊中的 HMB-Ca:50078±10507;水中的 HMB-Ca:47871±10783;HMB-FA:29130±12946µmol L×720min)、Cmax(胶囊中的 HMB-Ca:229.2±65.9;水中的 HMB-Ca:249.7±49.7;HMB-FA:139.1±67.2µmol L)和相对生物利用度(胶囊中的 HMB-Ca:104.8±14.9%;HMB-FA:61.5±17.0%)均低于 HMB-Ca(均 p<0.001)。与 HMB-Ca 相比,HMB-FA 的 HMB-Ca 在水中的 Tmax(43±22min)最快,而 HMB-Ca 在胶囊中的 Tmax(79±40min)和 HMB-FA(78±21min)最慢(均 p<0.05),而 t 值在处理之间相似。总之,与 HMB-FA 相比,HMB-Ca 表现出更好的生物利用度,而 HMB-Ca 在水中的吸收速度更快。所有形式的消除动力学相似,表明 HMB 的药物形式影响吸收速度,但不影响其分布或消除。