• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

相似文献

1
Absolute risks of cervical precancer among women who fulfill exiting guidelines based on HPV and cytology cotesting.基于 HPV 和细胞学联合检测的现有指南,满足条件的女性中宫颈癌前病变的绝对风险。
Int J Cancer. 2020 Feb 1;146(3):617-626. doi: 10.1002/ijc.32268. Epub 2019 Apr 8.
2
Prophylactic vaccination against human papillomaviruses to prevent cervical cancer and its precursors.接种人乳头瘤病毒预防性疫苗以预防宫颈癌及其癌前病变。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2018 May 9;5(5):CD009069. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD009069.pub3.
3
Estimated Cancer Risk in Females Who Meet the Criteria to Exit Cervical Cancer Screening.符合停止宫颈癌筛查标准的女性的估计癌症风险。
JAMA Netw Open. 2025 Mar 3;8(3):e250479. doi: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2025.0479.
4
Cytology versus HPV testing for cervical cancer screening in the general population.普通人群宫颈癌筛查中细胞学检查与HPV检测的比较
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2017 Aug 10;8(8):CD008587. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD008587.pub2.
5
[Health technology assessment report. Use of liquid-based cytology for cervical cancer precursors screening].[卫生技术评估报告。液基细胞学在宫颈癌前病变筛查中的应用]
Epidemiol Prev. 2012 Sep-Oct;36(5 Suppl 2):e1-e33.
6
Human papillomavirus testing versus repeat cytology for triage of minor cytological cervical lesions.人乳头瘤病毒检测与重复细胞学检查用于轻度宫颈细胞学病变的分流
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2013 Mar 28;2013(3):CD008054. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD008054.pub2.
7
Immediate referral to colposcopy versus cytological surveillance for minor cervical cytological abnormalities in the absence of HPV test.在未进行人乳头瘤病毒(HPV)检测的情况下,对于轻度宫颈细胞学异常,立即转诊至阴道镜检查与细胞学监测的比较
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2017 Jan 26;1(1):CD009836. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD009836.pub2.
8
Associations of obesity with post-treatment risks of cervical precancer and cancer.肥胖与宫颈上皮内瘤变和癌症治疗后风险的关联。
Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2025 Jul;233(1):40.e1-40.e16. doi: 10.1016/j.ajog.2024.12.002. Epub 2024 Dec 6.
9
Calendar-period trends in cervical precancer and cancer diagnoses since the introduction of human papillomavirus and cytology co-testing into routine cervical cancer screening at Kaiser Permanente Northern California.自人乳头瘤病毒和细胞学联合检测引入凯撒永久北加州常规宫颈癌筛查以来,宫颈癌前病变和癌症诊断的日历周期趋势。
Gynecol Oncol. 2024 May;184:89-95. doi: 10.1016/j.ygyno.2024.01.038. Epub 2024 Jan 31.
10
Liquid-based cytology and human papillomavirus testing to screen for cervical cancer: a systematic review for the U.S. Preventive Services Task Force.液基细胞学检查和人乳头瘤病毒检测筛查宫颈癌:美国预防服务工作组的系统评价。
Ann Intern Med. 2011 Nov 15;155(10):687-97, W214-5. doi: 10.7326/0003-4819-155-10-201111150-00376. Epub 2011 Oct 17.

引用本文的文献

1
Should the age range of the Dutch hrHPV-based cervical cancer screening program be broadened? A modelling study using cohort effects.荷兰基于高危型人乳头瘤病毒的宫颈癌筛查项目的年龄范围应该扩大吗?一项使用队列效应的建模研究。
Int J Cancer. 2025 Aug 15;157(4):627-633. doi: 10.1002/ijc.35435. Epub 2025 Apr 28.
2
Estimated Cancer Risk in Females Who Meet the Criteria to Exit Cervical Cancer Screening.符合停止宫颈癌筛查标准的女性的估计癌症风险。
JAMA Netw Open. 2025 Mar 3;8(3):e250479. doi: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2025.0479.
3
The Improving Risk Informed HPV Screening (IRIS) Study: Design and Baseline Characteristics.《改善 HPV 风险知情筛查研究(IRIS):设计与基线特征》。
Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev. 2022 Feb;31(2):486-492. doi: 10.1158/1055-9965.EPI-21-0865. Epub 2021 Nov 17.
4
Impact of screening between the ages of 60 and 64 on cumulative rates of cervical cancer to age 84y by screening history at ages 50 to 59: A population-based case-control study.60-64 岁筛查对 50-59 岁筛查史者 84 岁累积宫颈癌发生率的影响:基于人群的病例对照研究。
Prev Med. 2021 Aug;149:106625. doi: 10.1016/j.ypmed.2021.106625. Epub 2021 May 19.
5
Understanding HPV-positive women's needs and experiences in relation to patient-provider communication issues: a qualitative study.了解 HPV 阳性女性在患者与医务人员沟通问题方面的需求和体验:一项定性研究。
BMC Health Serv Res. 2021 Mar 31;21(1):286. doi: 10.1186/s12913-021-06283-w.
6
Introduction of HPV testing for cervical cancer screening in Central America: The Scale-Up project.中美洲宫颈癌筛查中 HPV 检测的引入:扩大规模项目。
Prev Med. 2020 Jun;135:106076. doi: 10.1016/j.ypmed.2020.106076. Epub 2020 Apr 2.

本文引用的文献

1
Screening for Cervical Cancer: US Preventive Services Task Force Recommendation Statement.宫颈癌筛查:美国预防服务工作组推荐声明。
JAMA. 2018 Aug 21;320(7):674-686. doi: 10.1001/jama.2018.10897.
2
Optimal Cervical Cancer Screening in Women Vaccinated Against Human Papillomavirus.接种人乳头瘤病毒疫苗女性的最佳宫颈癌筛查
J Natl Cancer Inst. 2016 Oct 18;109(2). doi: 10.1093/jnci/djw216. Print 2017 Feb.
3
Challenges in breast and cervical cancer control in Japan.日本在乳腺癌和宫颈癌防治方面面临的挑战。
Lancet Oncol. 2016 Jul;17(7):e305-e312. doi: 10.1016/S1470-2045(16)30121-8.
4
Risk of invasive cervical cancer after atypical glandular cells in cervical screening: nationwide cohort study.宫颈筛查中出现非典型腺细胞后发生浸润性宫颈癌的风险:全国队列研究
BMJ. 2016 Feb 11;352:i276. doi: 10.1136/bmj.i276.
5
Cervical cancer screening in Europe: Quality assurance and organisation of programmes.欧洲的宫颈癌筛查:项目的质量保证与组织
Eur J Cancer. 2015 May;51(8):950-68. doi: 10.1016/j.ejca.2015.03.008. Epub 2015 Mar 25.
6
Increased cervical cancer risk associated with screening at longer intervals.宫颈癌风险增加与更长筛查间隔相关。
Obstet Gynecol. 2015 Feb;125(2):311-315. doi: 10.1097/AOG.0000000000000632.
7
Reassurance against future risk of precancer and cancer conferred by a negative human papillomavirus test.人乳头瘤病毒检测呈阴性可消除未来患癌前病变和癌症的风险。
J Natl Cancer Inst. 2014 Jul 18;106(8). doi: 10.1093/jnci/dju153. Print 2014 Aug.
8
Cervical screening at age 50-64 years and the risk of cervical cancer at age 65 years and older: population-based case control study.50至64岁的宫颈癌筛查与65岁及以上人群患宫颈癌的风险:基于人群的病例对照研究。
PLoS Med. 2014 Jan;11(1):e1001585. doi: 10.1371/journal.pmed.1001585. Epub 2014 Jan 14.
9
Long term duration of protective effect for HPV negative women: follow-up of primary HPV screening randomised controlled trial.HPV 阴性女性保护作用的长期持续时间:原发性 HPV 筛查随机对照试验的随访。
BMJ. 2014 Jan 16;348:g130. doi: 10.1136/bmj.g130.
10
Counterpoint: cervical cancer screening guidelines--approaching the golden age.观点对垒:宫颈癌筛查指南——即将步入黄金时代。
Am J Epidemiol. 2013 Oct 1;178(7):1023-6; discussion 1027. doi: 10.1093/aje/kwt171. Epub 2013 Aug 21.

基于 HPV 和细胞学联合检测的现有指南,满足条件的女性中宫颈癌前病变的绝对风险。

Absolute risks of cervical precancer among women who fulfill exiting guidelines based on HPV and cytology cotesting.

机构信息

Centre for Cancer Prevention, Wolfson Institute of Preventive Medicine, Queen Mary University of London, London, United Kingdom.

Division of Cancer Epidemiology and Genetics, National Cancer Institute, National Institutes of Health, DHHS, Bethesda, MD, USA.

出版信息

Int J Cancer. 2020 Feb 1;146(3):617-626. doi: 10.1002/ijc.32268. Epub 2019 Apr 8.

DOI:10.1002/ijc.32268
PMID:30861114
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC6742586/
Abstract

US guidelines recommend that most women older than 65 years cease cervical screening after two consecutive negative cotests (concurrent HPV and cytology tests) in the previous 10 years, with one in the last 5 years. However, this recommendation was based on expert opinion and modeling rather than empirical data on cancer risk. We therefore estimated the 5-year risks of cervical precancer (cervical intraepithelial neoplasia grade 3 or adenocarcinoma in situ [CIN3]) after one, two and three negative cotests among 346,760 women aged 55-64 years undergoing routine cotesting at Kaiser Permanente Northern California (2003-2015). Women with a history of excisional treatment or CIN2+ were excluded. No woman with one or more negative cotests was diagnosed with cancer during follow-up. Five-year risks of CIN3 after one, two, and three consecutive negative cotests were 0.034% (95% CI: 0.023%-0.046%), 0.041% (95% CI: 0.007%-0.076%) and 0.016% (95% CI: 0.000%-0.052%), respectively (p < 0.001). These risks did not appreciably differ by a positive cotest result prior to the one, two or three negative cotest(s). Since CIN3 risks after one or more negative cotests were significantly below a proposed 0.12% CIN3+ risk threshold for a 5-year screening interval, a longer screening interval in these women is justified. However, the choice of how many negative cotests provide sufficient safety against invasive cancer over a woman's remaining life represents a value judgment based on the harms versus benefits of continued screening. Ideally, this guideline should be informed by longer-term follow-up given that exiting is a long-term decision.

摘要

美国指南建议,大多数 65 岁以上的女性在过去 10 年中进行了两次连续的阴性 cotest(同时进行 HPV 和细胞学检测),且最近 5 年内有一次检测结果为阴性后,即可停止宫颈筛查。然而,这一建议是基于专家意见和建模,而不是关于癌症风险的实证数据。因此,我们在加利福尼亚州 Kaiser Permanente 北部地区接受常规 cotest 的 346760 名 55-64 岁女性中,估计了在一次、两次和三次连续阴性 cotest 后发生宫颈癌前病变(宫颈上皮内瘤变 3 级或原位腺癌 [CIN3])的 5 年风险(2003-2015 年)。既往有切除术治疗或 CIN2+的女性被排除在外。在随访期间,没有女性被诊断出患有癌症。一次、两次和三次连续阴性 cotest 后发生 CIN3 的 5 年风险分别为 0.034%(95%CI:0.023%-0.046%)、0.041%(95%CI:0.007%-0.076%)和 0.016%(95%CI:0.000%-0.052%)(p<0.001)。在一次、两次或三次阴性 cotest 之前,阳性 cotest 结果对这些风险没有明显影响。由于一次或多次阴性 cotest 后 CIN3 的风险明显低于建议的 5 年筛查间隔时 0.12%的 CIN3+风险阈值,因此这些女性的筛查间隔可以延长。然而,在女性剩余的生命中,选择多少次阴性 cotest 可以提供足够的安全性以避免侵袭性癌症,这是一个基于继续筛查的利弊的价值判断。理想情况下,鉴于退出是一个长期的决定,应该通过更长时间的随访来为这一指南提供信息。