• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

经皮冠状动脉介入治疗(PCI)后,因桡动脉穿刺鞘管碎片残留继发感染性慢性鼻窦炎。

Infected chronic sinus secondary to a retained fragment of radial artery introducer sheath following percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI).

作者信息

Ghazala Christopher George, Marrow Benjamin Alexander, Kearney Dermot, Harrison John William Kenneth

机构信息

Department of Trauma and Orthopaedic Surgery, Gateshead Health NHS Foundation Trust, Gateshead, UK.

Department of Cardiology, Gateshead Health NHS Foundation Trust, Gateshead, UK.

出版信息

BMJ Case Rep. 2019 Mar 12;12(3):e227136. doi: 10.1136/bcr-2018-227136.

DOI:10.1136/bcr-2018-227136
PMID:30862671
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC6441256/
Abstract

Coronary angiography and percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) are frequently performed procedures in the UK and the developed world, with the radial artery becoming the preferred route of access. A chronically retained macroscopic fragment of radial artery introducer sheath is a very rare complication that has not, to our knowledge, been reported. We report the case of a 62-year-old woman who underwent PCI and developed a persisting infected sinus and abscess at the cannulation site despite multiple courses of antibiotics. Surgical exploration of the forearm recovered a foreign body that was found in the brachioradialis muscle and resembled a fragment of hydrophilic sheath. In conclusion, this case highlights that it is possible to leave macroscopic fragments of hydrophilic sheaths in situ. This is likely to be encountered during difficult access, especially during arterial spasm, and it is advised that the sheath and any other vascular access device is thoroughly inspected following removal.

摘要

冠状动脉造影和经皮冠状动脉介入治疗(PCI)在英国及发达国家是常见的诊疗操作,桡动脉已成为首选的入路途径。桡动脉穿刺鞘的宏观碎片长期留存是一种极为罕见的并发症,据我们所知,此前尚无相关报道。我们报告了一例62岁女性患者,她接受了PCI治疗,尽管接受了多疗程抗生素治疗,但插管部位仍出现持续感染的窦道和脓肿。对前臂进行手术探查时,在肱桡肌中发现了一个异物,其类似亲水鞘的碎片。总之,该病例表明亲水鞘的宏观碎片有可能残留原位。这种情况可能在穿刺困难时出现,尤其是在动脉痉挛期间,建议在移除鞘管及任何其他血管入路装置后进行彻底检查。

相似文献

1
Infected chronic sinus secondary to a retained fragment of radial artery introducer sheath following percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI).经皮冠状动脉介入治疗(PCI)后,因桡动脉穿刺鞘管碎片残留继发感染性慢性鼻窦炎。
BMJ Case Rep. 2019 Mar 12;12(3):e227136. doi: 10.1136/bcr-2018-227136.
2
Ultrasound evaluation of forearm arteries in patients undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention via radial artery access: results of one-year follow-up.经桡动脉途径行冠状动脉介入治疗患者前臂动脉的超声评估:一年随访结果
Kardiol Pol. 2015;73(7):502-10. doi: 10.5603/KP.a2015.0029.
3
Comparison of Radial Artery Occlusion Following Transradial Access for Percutaneous Coronary Intervention Using Sheath-based versus Sheathless Technique.经桡动脉入路行经皮冠状动脉介入治疗中采用带鞘管技术与无鞘管技术后桡动脉闭塞的比较。
Sci Rep. 2018 Aug 13;8(1):12026. doi: 10.1038/s41598-018-30462-1.
4
Identifying a better strategy for ad hoc percutaneous coronary intervention in patients with anticipated unfavorable radial access: the Little Women study.为预期桡动脉入路不佳的患者确定更好的临时经皮冠状动脉介入治疗策略:小妇人研究。
Cardiovasc Revasc Med. 2018 Jun;19(4):413-417. doi: 10.1016/j.carrev.2017.10.006. Epub 2017 Oct 16.
5
Access-site complications of transradial percutaneous coronary intervention using sheathless guiding catheters for acute coronary syndrome: a prospective cohort study with radial ultrasound follow-up.经桡动脉途径使用无鞘引导导管行直接经皮冠状动脉介入治疗急性冠状动脉综合征的入路部位并发症:一项前瞻性队列研究并桡动脉超声随访。
Cardiovasc Interv Ther. 2020 Oct;35(4):343-352. doi: 10.1007/s12928-019-00632-7. Epub 2019 Dec 6.
6
Ultrahigh-resolution ultrasound characterization of access site trauma and intimal hyperplasia following use of a 7F sheathless guide versus 6F sheath/guide combination for transradial artery PCI: Results of the PRAGMATIC trial.经桡动脉途径行 PCI 时使用 7F 无鞘导引导管与 6F 鞘/导引导管组合对比对入路部位创伤和内膜增生的超高分辨率超声特征:PRAGMATIC 试验结果。
Am Heart J. 2018 Apr;198:75-83. doi: 10.1016/j.ahj.2017.11.017. Epub 2017 Dec 15.
7
Successful Crossing of Complex Radial and Brachial Artery Anatomy Using a New Approach: Railtracking.经新方法(Railtracking)成功完成复杂桡动脉和肱动脉解剖结构的穿越。
Am J Case Rep. 2022 Feb 21;23:e934760. doi: 10.12659/AJCR.934760.
8
Impact of length and hydrophilic coating of the introducer sheath on radial artery spasm during transradial coronary intervention: a randomized study.导引导管鞘的长度和亲水涂层对经桡动脉冠状动脉介入治疗中桡动脉痉挛的影响:一项随机研究。
JACC Cardiovasc Interv. 2010 May;3(5):475-83. doi: 10.1016/j.jcin.2010.03.009.
9
Safety of coronary angiography and percutaneous coronary intervention via the radial versus femoral route in patients on uninterrupted oral anticoagulation with warfarin.在接受华法林持续口服抗凝治疗的患者中,经桡动脉与股动脉途径进行冠状动脉造影和经皮冠状动脉介入治疗的安全性。
Am Heart J. 2014 Oct;168(4):537-44. doi: 10.1016/j.ahj.2014.06.016. Epub 2014 Jul 3.
10
A novel nonpharmacologic technique to remove entrapped radial sheath.一种用于移除嵌顿桡侧腱鞘的新型非药物技术。
Catheter Cardiovasc Interv. 2015 Jan 1;85(1):E35-8. doi: 10.1002/ccd.25593. Epub 2014 Aug 30.

引用本文的文献

1
Case Report: Difficult radial artery sheath removal: a report of two cases and review of the literature.病例报告:桡动脉鞘管拔除困难:两例报告及文献复习
Front Cardiovasc Med. 2025 May 2;12:1581346. doi: 10.3389/fcvm.2025.1581346. eCollection 2025.
2
Brachial Plexus Block for Removal of Retained Radial Artery Sheath.臂丛神经阻滞用于取出桡动脉鞘管残留
Cureus. 2022 Dec 28;14(12):e33068. doi: 10.7759/cureus.33068. eCollection 2022 Dec.

本文引用的文献

1
Revealing the impact of local access-site complications and upper extremity dysfunction post transradial percutaneous coronary procedures.揭示经桡动脉入路局部并发症和上肢功能障碍对经皮冠状动脉介入治疗的影响。
Neth Heart J. 2015 Nov;23(11):514-24. doi: 10.1007/s12471-015-0747-9.
2
Radial versus femoral access in patients with acute coronary syndromes undergoing invasive management: a randomised multicentre trial.经皮冠状动脉介入治疗的急性冠状动脉综合征患者中桡动脉与股动脉入路的随机多中心试验。
Lancet. 2015 Jun 20;385(9986):2465-76. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(15)60292-6. Epub 2015 Mar 16.
3
Comparison of a priori versus provisional heparin therapy on radial artery occlusion after transradial coronary angiography and patent hemostasis (from the PHARAOH Study).经桡动脉冠状动脉造影和止血有效后桡动脉闭塞的肝素预先治疗与临时治疗的比较(来自 PHARAOH 研究)。
Am J Cardiol. 2012 Jul 15;110(2):173-6. doi: 10.1016/j.amjcard.2012.03.007. Epub 2012 Apr 10.
4
Radial versus femoral access for coronary angiography and intervention in patients with acute coronary syndromes (RIVAL): a randomised, parallel group, multicentre trial.经桡动脉与股动脉入路行冠状动脉造影和介入治疗急性冠状动脉综合征患者的随机、平行分组、多中心试验(RIVAL)
Lancet. 2011 Apr 23;377(9775):1409-20. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(11)60404-2. Epub 2011 Apr 4.
5
Hydrophilic-coated radial sheaths: a leap forward, but watch where you land.亲水涂层桡动脉鞘管:向前迈进了一步,但要注意落脚点。
JACC Cardiovasc Interv. 2010 May;3(5):484-5. doi: 10.1016/j.jcin.2010.03.008.
6
Impact of length and hydrophilic coating of the introducer sheath on radial artery spasm during transradial coronary intervention: a randomized study.导引导管鞘的长度和亲水涂层对经桡动脉冠状动脉介入治疗中桡动脉痉挛的影响:一项随机研究。
JACC Cardiovasc Interv. 2010 May;3(5):475-83. doi: 10.1016/j.jcin.2010.03.009.
7
Sterile inflammation associated with transradial catheterization and hydrophilic sheaths.
Catheter Cardiovasc Interv. 2003 Jun;59(2):207-13. doi: 10.1002/ccd.10522.
8
Hydrophilic coating aids radial sheath withdrawal and reduces patient discomfort following transradial coronary intervention: a randomized double-blind comparison of coated and uncoated sheaths.亲水涂层有助于经桡动脉冠状动脉介入术后桡动脉鞘管的拔出并减轻患者不适:涂层鞘管与未涂层鞘管的随机双盲比较
Catheter Cardiovasc Interv. 2003 Jun;59(2):161-4. doi: 10.1002/ccd.10444.
9
Percutaneous radial artery approach for coronary angiography.经皮桡动脉途径用于冠状动脉造影。
Cathet Cardiovasc Diagn. 1989 Jan;16(1):3-7. doi: 10.1002/ccd.1810160103.