Hoogendoorn Martine, Corro Ramos Isaac, Baldwin Michael, Luciani Laura, Fabron Cecile, Detournay Bruno, Rutten-van Mölken Maureen P M H
institute for Medical Technology Assessment (iMTA), Erasmus University Rotterdam, Rotterdam, the Netherlands,
Boehringer Ingelheim GmbH, Ingelheim, Germany.
Int J Chron Obstruct Pulmon Dis. 2019 Feb 18;14:447-456. doi: 10.2147/COPD.S191031. eCollection 2019.
Combinations of long-acting bronchodilators are recommended to reduce the rate of COPD exacerbations. Evidence from the DYNAGITO trial showed that the fixed-dose combination of tiotropium + olodaterol reduced the annual rate of total exacerbations (<0.05) compared with tiotropium monotherapy. This study aimed to estimate the cost-effectiveness of the fixed-dose combination of tiotropium + olodaterol vs tiotropium monotherapy in COPD patients in the French setting.
A recently developed COPD patient-level simulation model was used to simulate the lifetime effects and costs for 15,000 patients receiving either tiotropium + olodaterol or tiotropium monotherapy by applying the reduction in annual exacerbation rate as observed in the DYNAGITO trial. The model was adapted to the French setting by including French unit costs for treatment medication, COPD maintenance treatment, COPD exacerbations (moderate or severe), and pneumonia. The main outcomes were the annual (severe) exacerbation rate, the number of quality-adjusted life-years (QALYs), and total lifetime costs.
The number of QALYs for treatment with tiotropium + olodaterol was 0.042 higher compared with tiotropium monotherapy. Using a societal perspective, tiotropium + olodaterol resulted in a cost increase of +€123 and an incremental cost-effectiveness ratio (ICER) of €2,900 per QALY compared with tiotropium monotherapy. From a French National Sickness Fund perspective, total lifetime costs were reduced by €272 with tiotropium + olodaterol, resulting in tiotropium + olodaterol being the dominant treatment option, that is, more effects with less costs. Sensitivity analyses showed that reducing the cost of exacerbations by 34% increased the ICER to €15,400, which could still be considered cost-effective in the French setting.
Treatment with tiotropium + olodaterol resulted in a gain in QALYs and savings in costs compared with tiotropium monotherapy using a National Sickness Fund perspective in France. From the societal perspective, tiotropium + olodaterol was found to be cost-effective with a low cost per QALY.
推荐使用长效支气管扩张剂联合治疗以降低慢性阻塞性肺疾病(COPD)急性加重的发生率。DYNAGITO试验的证据表明,与噻托溴铵单药治疗相比,噻托溴铵+奥达特罗固定剂量联合用药可降低总急性加重的年发生率(<0.05)。本研究旨在评估在法国背景下,噻托溴铵+奥达特罗固定剂量联合用药与噻托溴铵单药治疗相比,对COPD患者的成本效益。
使用最近开发的COPD患者水平模拟模型,通过应用DYNAGITO试验中观察到的年急性加重率降低情况,模拟15000例接受噻托溴铵+奥达特罗或噻托溴铵单药治疗患者的终生影响和成本。通过纳入法国治疗药物、COPD维持治疗、COPD急性加重(中度或重度)及肺炎的单位成本,使该模型适用于法国背景。主要结局指标为年(重度)急性加重率、质量调整生命年(QALY)数及终生总成本。
与噻托溴铵单药治疗相比,噻托溴铵+奥达特罗治疗的QALY数高出0.042。从社会角度来看,与噻托溴铵单药治疗相比,噻托溴铵+奥达特罗导致成本增加123欧元,每QALY的增量成本效益比(ICER)为2900欧元。从法国国家疾病基金的角度来看,噻托溴铵+奥达特罗使终生总成本降低了272欧元,从而使噻托溴铵+奥达特罗成为主要治疗选择,即效果更好且成本更低。敏感性分析表明,将急性加重成本降低34%会使ICER增至15400欧元,在法国背景下这仍可被认为具有成本效益。
在法国,从国家疾病基金的角度来看,与噻托溴铵单药治疗相比,噻托溴铵+奥达特罗治疗可使QALY增加且成本节约。从社会角度来看,噻托溴铵+奥达特罗被发现具有成本效益且每QALY成本较低。