• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

基于流程流数据的协作问题解决评估:提取指标和对二元数据建模的新范式。

Assessment of Collaborative Problem Solving Based on Process Stream Data: A New Paradigm for Extracting Indicators and Modeling Dyad Data.

作者信息

Yuan Jianlin, Xiao Yue, Liu Hongyun

机构信息

Educational Science Research Institute, Hunan University, Changsha, Hunan, China.

Faculty of Psychology, Beijing Normal University, Beijing, China.

出版信息

Front Psychol. 2019 Feb 26;10:369. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2019.00369. eCollection 2019.

DOI:10.3389/fpsyg.2019.00369
PMID:30863344
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC6399305/
Abstract

As one of the important 21st-century skills, collaborative problem solving (CPS) has aroused widespread concern in assessment. To measure this skill, two initiative approaches have been created: the human-to-human and human-to-agent modes. Between them, the human-to-human interaction is much closer to the real-world situation and its process stream data can reveal more details about the cognitive processes. The challenge for fully tapping into the information obtained from this mode is how to extract and model indicators from the data. However, the existing approaches have their limitations. In the present study, we proposed a new paradigm for extracting indicators and modeling the dyad data in the human-to-human mode. Specifically, both individual and group indicators were extracted from the data stream as evidence for demonstrating CPS skills. Afterward, a within-item multidimensional Rasch model was used to fit the dyad data. To validate the paradigm, we developed five online tasks following the asymmetric mechanism, one for practice and four for formal testing. Four hundred thirty-four Chinese students participated in the assessment and the online platform recorded their crucial actions with time stamps. The generated process stream data was handled with the proposed paradigm. Results showed that the model fitted well. The indicator parameter estimates and fitting indexes were acceptable, and students were well differentiated. In general, the new paradigm of extracting indicators and modeling the dyad data is feasible and valid in the human-to-human assessment of CPS. Finally, the limitations of the current study and further research directions are discussed.

摘要

作为21世纪的重要技能之一,协作问题解决(CPS)在评估中引起了广泛关注。为了测量这项技能,已经创建了两种主动方法:人对人模式和人对智能体模式。在这两种模式中,人对人互动更接近现实世界的情况,其过程流数据可以揭示更多关于认知过程的细节。充分利用从这种模式获得的信息面临的挑战是如何从数据中提取指标并进行建模。然而,现有方法存在局限性。在本研究中,我们提出了一种新的范式,用于在人对人模式下提取指标并对二元组数据进行建模。具体来说,从数据流中提取个体和小组指标,作为展示CPS技能的证据。随后,使用项目内多维Rasch模型来拟合二元组数据。为了验证该范式,我们按照非对称机制开发了五个在线任务,一个用于练习,四个用于正式测试。434名中国学生参与了评估,在线平台记录了他们带有时间戳的关键行为。生成的过程流数据采用所提出的范式进行处理。结果表明模型拟合良好。指标参数估计和拟合指数是可接受的,并且学生之间有很好的区分度。总体而言,在人对人CPS评估中,提取指标并对二元组数据进行建模的新范式是可行且有效的。最后,讨论了当前研究的局限性和进一步的研究方向。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/ec63/6399305/ca79feb8ada0/fpsyg-10-00369-a001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/ec63/6399305/faf221ef287a/fpsyg-10-00369-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/ec63/6399305/dc06523c650c/fpsyg-10-00369-g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/ec63/6399305/13f2ae8e0907/fpsyg-10-00369-g003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/ec63/6399305/0e6484cd9453/fpsyg-10-00369-g004.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/ec63/6399305/ca79feb8ada0/fpsyg-10-00369-a001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/ec63/6399305/faf221ef287a/fpsyg-10-00369-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/ec63/6399305/dc06523c650c/fpsyg-10-00369-g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/ec63/6399305/13f2ae8e0907/fpsyg-10-00369-g003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/ec63/6399305/0e6484cd9453/fpsyg-10-00369-g004.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/ec63/6399305/ca79feb8ada0/fpsyg-10-00369-a001.jpg

相似文献

1
Assessment of Collaborative Problem Solving Based on Process Stream Data: A New Paradigm for Extracting Indicators and Modeling Dyad Data.基于流程流数据的协作问题解决评估:提取指标和对二元数据建模的新范式。
Front Psychol. 2019 Feb 26;10:369. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2019.00369. eCollection 2019.
2
Rasch Measurement of Collaborative Problem Solving in an Online Environment.在线环境中协作问题解决的拉施测量
J Appl Meas. 2016;17(1):35-53.
3
A Continuous-Time Dynamic Choice Measurement Model for Problem-Solving Process Data.一种用于解决问题过程数据的连续时间动态选择测量模型。
Psychometrika. 2020 Dec;85(4):1052-1075. doi: 10.1007/s11336-020-09734-1. Epub 2020 Dec 21.
4
Computer-Based Collaborative Problem Solving in PISA 2015 and the Role of Personality.2015年国际学生评估项目(PISA)中基于计算机的协作问题解决及人格的作用
J Intell. 2019 Jul 1;7(3):15. doi: 10.3390/jintelligence7030015.
5
Exploring Automated Classification Approaches to Advance the Assessment of Collaborative Problem Solving Skills.探索自动化分类方法以推进协作问题解决技能评估
J Intell. 2022 Jul 4;10(3):39. doi: 10.3390/jintelligence10030039.
6
Folic acid supplementation and malaria susceptibility and severity among people taking antifolate antimalarial drugs in endemic areas.在流行地区,服用抗叶酸抗疟药物的人群中,叶酸补充剂与疟疾易感性和严重程度的关系。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2022 Feb 1;2(2022):CD014217. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD014217.
7
Pair interactions in online assessments of collaborative problem solving: case-based portraits.协作问题解决在线评估中的配对互动:基于案例的描述
Res Pract Technol Enhanc Learn. 2018;13(1):12. doi: 10.1186/s41039-018-0079-7. Epub 2018 Aug 9.
8
Factors influencing the complex problem-solving skills in reflective learning: results from partial least square structural equation modeling and fuzzy set qualitative comparative analysis.影响反思学习中复杂问题解决能力的因素:偏最小二乘结构方程建模和模糊集定性比较分析的结果。
BMC Med Educ. 2023 May 25;23(1):382. doi: 10.1186/s12909-023-04326-w.
9
Visual analysis of commognitive conflict in collaborative problem solving in classrooms.课堂协作问题解决中认知冲突的视觉分析
Front Psychol. 2023 Dec 20;14:1216652. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2023.1216652. eCollection 2023.
10
Statistical Analysis of Complex Problem-Solving Process Data: An Event History Analysis Approach.复杂问题解决过程数据的统计分析:一种事件历史分析方法。
Front Psychol. 2019 Mar 18;10:486. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2019.00486. eCollection 2019.

引用本文的文献

1
Assessing multiple abilities through process data in computer-based assessments: The multidimensional sequential response model (MSRM).通过基于计算机的评估中的过程数据评估多种能力:多维顺序响应模型(MSRM)。
Behav Res Methods. 2025 Apr 22;57(5):152. doi: 10.3758/s13428-025-02658-7.
2
Investigating response behavior through TF-IDF and Word2vec text analysis: A case study of PISA 2012 problem-solving process data.通过TF-IDF和Word2vec文本分析研究反应行为:以2012年国际学生评估项目(PISA)解决问题过程数据为例
Heliyon. 2024 Aug 10;10(16):e35945. doi: 10.1016/j.heliyon.2024.e35945. eCollection 2024 Aug 30.
3
Polytomous Effectiveness Indicators in Complex Problem-Solving Tasks and Their Applications in Developing Measurement Model.

本文引用的文献

1
Complex Problem Solving in Assessments of Collaborative Problem Solving.协作问题解决评估中的复杂问题解决
J Intell. 2017 Mar 27;5(2):10. doi: 10.3390/jintelligence5020010.
2
Computational Psychometrics for the Measurement of Collaborative Problem Solving Skills.用于测量协作问题解决技能的计算心理测量学
Front Psychol. 2017 Nov 29;8:2029. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2017.02029. eCollection 2017.
3
A Randomized Trial of Motivational Interviewing: Cessation Induction Among Smokers With Low Desire to Quit.动机性访谈的随机试验:戒烟意愿低的吸烟者的戒烟诱导
多分类有效性指标在复杂问题解决任务中的应用及其在测量模型开发中的应用。
Psychometrika. 2024 Sep;89(3):877-902. doi: 10.1007/s11336-024-09963-8. Epub 2024 Apr 9.
4
Biclustering of Log Data: Insights from a Computer-Based Complex Problem Solving Assessment.日志数据的双聚类分析:基于计算机的复杂问题解决评估的见解
J Intell. 2024 Jan 17;12(1):10. doi: 10.3390/jintelligence12010010.
5
Investigating Planning and Non-Targeted Exploration in PIAAC 2012: Validating Their Measures Based on Process Data and Investigating Their Relationships with Problem-Solving Competency.探究2012年国际成人能力评估项目(PIAAC)中的规划与非定向探索:基于过程数据验证其测量方法并探究它们与问题解决能力的关系。
J Intell. 2023 Aug 7;11(8):156. doi: 10.3390/jintelligence11080156.
6
Joint modeling of action sequences and action time in computer-based interactive tasks.基于计算机的交互式任务中动作序列和动作时间的联合建模。
Behav Res Methods. 2024 Aug;56(5):4293-4310. doi: 10.3758/s13428-023-02178-2. Epub 2023 Jul 10.
7
Exploring Automated Classification Approaches to Advance the Assessment of Collaborative Problem Solving Skills.探索自动化分类方法以推进协作问题解决技能评估
J Intell. 2022 Jul 4;10(3):39. doi: 10.3390/jintelligence10030039.
Am J Prev Med. 2016 May;50(5):573-583. doi: 10.1016/j.amepre.2015.10.013. Epub 2015 Dec 23.
4
Automated Assessment of Patients' Self-Narratives for Posttraumatic Stress Disorder Screening Using Natural Language Processing and Text Mining.使用自然语言处理和文本挖掘技术对创伤后应激障碍进行患者自我叙述的自动评估。
Assessment. 2017 Mar;24(2):157-172. doi: 10.1177/1073191115602551. Epub 2016 Jul 28.
5
Modelling dyadic interaction with Hawkes processes.用霍克斯过程对二元互动进行建模。
Psychometrika. 2013 Oct;78(4):793-814. doi: 10.1007/s11336-013-9329-1. Epub 2013 Feb 22.