上消化道出血的评分系统：哪一种评分效果更佳？ - Suppr

Suppr

超能文献

Scoring systems for upper gastrointestinal bleeding: Which one scores better?

作者信息

Dhir Vinay, Shah Rahul

机构信息

Institute of Digestive and Liver Care, S L Raheja Hospital, Mahim (W), Mumbai, 400 016, India.

出版信息

Indian J Gastroenterol. 2019 Apr;38(2):95-97. doi: 10.1007/s12664-019-00945-8.

DOI:10.1007/s12664-019-00945-8

PMID:30864010

Abstract

摘要

相似文献

Scoring systems for upper gastrointestinal bleeding: Which one scores better?上消化道出血的评分系统：哪一种评分效果更佳？

Indian J Gastroenterol. 2019 Apr;38(2):95-97. doi: 10.1007/s12664-019-00945-8.

Comparison of risk scoring systems for patients presenting with upper gastrointestinal bleeding: international multicentre prospective study.上消化道出血患者风险评分系统的比较：国际多中心前瞻性研究

BMJ. 2017 Jan 4;356:i6432. doi: 10.1136/bmj.i6432.

External validation of scoring systems in risk stratification of upper gastrointestinal bleeding.上消化道出血风险分层评分系统的外部验证

Indian J Gastroenterol. 2017 Mar;36(2):105-112. doi: 10.1007/s12664-017-0740-x. Epub 2017 Apr 10.

Prospective validation of the Glasgow Blatchford scoring system in patients with upper gastrointestinal bleeding in the emergency department.格拉斯哥布拉奇福德评分系统在急诊科上消化道出血患者中的前瞻性验证

Turk J Gastroenterol. 2012;23(5):448-55. doi: 10.4318/tjg.2012.0385.

Validity of modified early warning, Glasgow Blatchford, and pre-endoscopic Rockall scores in predicting prognosis of patients presenting to emergency department with upper gastrointestinal bleeding.改良早期预警评分、格拉斯哥布拉奇福德评分及内镜检查前罗卡尔评分在预测上消化道出血急诊患者预后中的有效性

Scand J Trauma Resusc Emerg Med. 2015 Dec 30;23:109. doi: 10.1186/s13049-015-0194-z.

Comparison of three scoring systems in predicting clinical outcomes in patients with acute upper gastrointestinal bleeding: a prospective observational study.三种评分系统对急性上消化道出血患者临床结局预测的比较：一项前瞻性观察研究。

J Dig Dis. 2016 Dec;17(12):820-828. doi: 10.1111/1751-2980.12433.

Comparison of the Glasgow-Blatchford and AIMS65 scoring systems for risk stratification in upper gastrointestinal bleeding in the emergency department.格拉斯哥-布拉奇福德评分系统与AIMS65评分系统在急诊科上消化道出血风险分层中的比较

Acad Emerg Med. 2015 Jan;22(1):22-30. doi: 10.1111/acem.12554. Epub 2014 Dec 31.

Comparison of three scoring systems for risk stratification in elderly patients wıth acute upper gastrointestinal bleeding.老年急性上消化道出血患者风险分层的三种评分系统比较。

Geriatr Gerontol Int. 2017 Apr;17(4):575-583. doi: 10.1111/ggi.12757. Epub 2016 Apr 14.

Performance of the Rockall scoring system in predicting the need for intervention and outcomes in patients with nonvariceal upper gastrointestinal bleeding in a Brazilian setting: a prospective study.在巴西环境下，应用 Rockall 评分系统预测非静脉曲张性上消化道出血患者干预需求和结局的表现：一项前瞻性研究。

Digestion. 2013;88(4):252-7. doi: 10.1159/000356313. Epub 2013 Dec 5.

Prospective comparison of three risk scoring systems in non-variceal and variceal upper gastrointestinal bleeding.非静脉曲张性和静脉曲张性上消化道出血中三种风险评分系统的前瞻性比较

J Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2016 Apr;31(4):761-7. doi: 10.1111/jgh.13222.

引用本文的文献

Early warning system enables accurate mortality risk prediction for acute gastrointestinal bleeding admitted to intensive care unit.早期预警系统可准确预测重症监护病房急性胃肠道出血患者的死亡风险。

Intern Emerg Med. 2024 Mar;19(2):511-521. doi: 10.1007/s11739-023-03428-z. Epub 2023 Sep 23.

The Accuracy of Pre-Endoscopic Scores for Mortality Prediction in Patients with Upper GI Bleeding and No Endoscopy Performed.上消化道出血且未行内镜检查患者死亡率预测的内镜前评分准确性

Diagnostics (Basel). 2023 Mar 21;13(6):1188. doi: 10.3390/diagnostics13061188.

本文引用的文献

Comparison of risk scores in upper gastrointestinal bleeding in western India: A prospective analysis.印度西部上消化道出血风险评分的比较：一项前瞻性分析。

Indian J Gastroenterol. 2019 Apr;38(2):117-127. doi: 10.1007/s12664-019-00951-w. Epub 2019 May 24.

Comparison of various prognostic scores in variceal and non-variceal upper gastrointestinal bleeding: A prospective cohort study.静脉曲张性与非静脉曲张性上消化道出血中各种预后评分的比较：一项前瞻性队列研究。

Indian J Gastroenterol. 2019 Apr;38(2):158-166. doi: 10.1007/s12664-018-0928-8. Epub 2019 Mar 4.

Association between an increase in blood urea nitrogen at 24 hours and worse outcomes in acute nonvariceal upper GI bleeding.24 小时内血尿素氮升高与急性非静脉曲张性上消化道出血不良结局的关系。

Gastrointest Endosc. 2017 Dec;86(6):1022-1027.e1. doi: 10.1016/j.gie.2017.03.1533. Epub 2017 Apr 2.

The Progetto Nazionale Emorragia Digestiva (PNED) system vs. the Rockall score as mortality predictors in patients with nonvariceal upper gastrointestinal bleeding: A multicenter prospective study.意大利国家消化性出血研究项目（PNED）系统与Rockall评分对非静脉曲张性上消化道出血患者死亡率的预测价值：一项多中心前瞻性研究

Rev Gastroenterol Mex. 2017 Apr-Jun;82(2):123-128. doi: 10.1016/j.rgmx.2016.08.003. Epub 2017 Mar 7.

Risk stratification in acute upper GI bleeding: comparison of the AIMS65 score with the Glasgow-Blatchford and Rockall scoring systems.急性上消化道出血的风险分层：AIMS65 评分与格拉斯哥-布拉奇福德和罗克洛评分系统的比较。

Gastrointest Endosc. 2016 Jun;83(6):1151-60. doi: 10.1016/j.gie.2015.10.021. Epub 2015 Oct 26.

J Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2016 Apr;31(4):761-7. doi: 10.1111/jgh.13222.

A Prospective, Multicenter Study of the AIMS65 Score Compared With the Glasgow-Blatchford Score in Predicting Upper Gastrointestinal Hemorrhage Outcomes.一项比较AIMS65评分与格拉斯哥-布拉奇福德评分预测上消化道出血结局的前瞻性多中心研究。

J Clin Gastroenterol. 2016 Jul;50(6):464-9. doi: 10.1097/MCG.0000000000000395.

A simplified clinical risk score predicts the need for early endoscopy in non-variceal upper gastrointestinal bleeding.一种简化的临床风险评分可预测非静脉曲张性上消化道出血患者早期内镜检查的必要性。

Dig Liver Dis. 2014 Sep;46(9):783-7. doi: 10.1016/j.dld.2014.05.006. Epub 2014 Jun 20.

A national survey on the initial management of upper gastrointestinal bleeding.一项关于上消化道出血初始管理的全国性调查。

J Clin Gastroenterol. 2014 Nov-Dec;48(10):e93-8. doi: 10.1097/MCG.0000000000000095.

A simple risk score accurately predicts in-hospital mortality, length of stay, and cost in acute upper GI bleeding.一个简单的风险评分能准确预测急性上消化道出血患者的住院死亡率、住院时间和费用。

Gastrointest Endosc. 2011 Dec;74(6):1215-24. doi: 10.1016/j.gie.2011.06.024. Epub 2011 Sep 10.

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述，助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型，支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验