• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

通过药代动力学和药效学模拟优化丙泊酚、瑞芬太尼和芬太尼的术中给药,以延长术后镇痛持续时间。

Optimizing intraoperative administration of propofol, remifentanil, and fentanyl through pharmacokinetic and pharmacodynamic simulations to increase the postoperative duration of analgesia.

机构信息

Department of Anesthesiology, University of Utah, 30 N 1900 E, Salt Lake City, UT, 84132, USA.

MedVis, 2050 E 1700 S, Salt Lake City, UT, 84108, USA.

出版信息

J Clin Monit Comput. 2019 Dec;33(6):959-971. doi: 10.1007/s10877-019-00298-9. Epub 2019 Mar 12.

DOI:10.1007/s10877-019-00298-9
PMID:30864076
Abstract

Titrating an intraoperative anesthetic to achieve the postoperative goals of rapid emergence and prolonged analgesia can be difficult because of inter-patient variability and the need to provide intraoperative sedation and analgesia. Modeling pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics of anesthetic administrations estimates drug concentrations and predicted responses to stimuli during anesthesia. With utility of these PK/PD models we created an algorithm to optimize the intraoperative dosing regimen. We hypothesized the optimization algorithm would find a dosing regimen that would increase the postoperative duration of analgesia, not increase the time to emergence, and meet the intraoperative requirements of sedation and analgesia. To evaluate these hypotheses we performed a simulation study on previously collected anesthesia data. We developed an algorithm to recommend different intraoperative dosing regimens for improved post-operative results. To test the post-operative results of the algorithm we tested it on previously collected anesthesia data. An anesthetic dataset of 21 patients was obtained from a previous study from an anesthetic database at the University of Utah. Using the anesthetic records from these surgeries we modeled 21 patients using the same patient demographics and anesthetic requirements as the dataset. The anesthetic was simulated for each of the 21 patients with three different dosing regimens. The three dosing regimens are: from the anesthesiologist as recorded in the dataset (control group), from the algorithm in the clinical scenario one (test group), and from the algorithm in the clinical scenario two (test group). We created two clinical scenarios for the optimization algorithm to perform; one with normal general anesthesia constraints and goals, and a second condition where a delayed time to emergence is allowed to further maximize the duration of analgesia. The algorithm was evaluated by comparing the post-operative results of the control group to each of the test groups. Comparing results between the clinical scenario 1 dosing to the actual dosing showed a median increase in the duration of analgesia by 6 min and the time to emergence by 0.3 min. This was achieved by decreasing the intraoperative remifentanil infusion rate, increased the fentanyl dosing regimen, and not changing the propofol infusion rate. Comparing results between the clinical scenario 2 dosing to the actual dosing showed a median increase in the duration of analgesia by 26 min and emergence by 1.5 min. To dosing regimen from clinical scenario 2 greatly increased the fentanyl dosing regimen and greatly decreased the remifentanil infusion rate with no change to the propofol infusion rate. The results from this preliminary analysis of the optimization algorithm appear to imply that it can operate as intended. However a clinical study is warranted to determine to what extent the optimization algorithm determined optimal dosing regimens can maximize the postoperative duration of analgesia without delaying the time to emergence in a clinical setting.

摘要

将术中麻醉滴定至术后快速苏醒和延长镇痛的目标可能具有挑战性,因为存在患者间变异性和需要提供术中镇静和镇痛。对麻醉给药的药代动力学和药效动力学建模估计药物浓度和预测麻醉期间对刺激的反应。利用这些 PK/PD 模型,我们创建了一种算法来优化术中给药方案。我们假设优化算法会找到一种可以增加术后镇痛持续时间、不增加苏醒时间并满足术中镇静和镇痛要求的给药方案。为了评估这些假设,我们对之前收集的麻醉数据进行了模拟研究。我们开发了一种算法来推荐不同的术中给药方案以获得更好的术后效果。为了测试算法的术后效果,我们将其应用于之前收集的麻醉数据。从犹他大学的麻醉数据库中的一项先前研究中获得了 21 名患者的麻醉数据集。我们使用这些手术的麻醉记录,使用与数据集相同的患者人口统计学和麻醉要求对 21 名患者进行建模。对 21 名患者中的每一名患者进行三种不同给药方案的模拟。三种给药方案是:来自数据集的麻醉师记录(对照组)、临床场景一中的算法(测试组 1)和临床场景二中的算法(测试组 2)。我们为优化算法创建了两个执行临床场景;一个具有正常全身麻醉约束和目标,另一个允许苏醒时间延迟以进一步最大限度地延长镇痛持续时间的条件。通过将术中瑞芬太尼输注率降低、增加芬太尼给药方案和不改变丙泊酚输注率来评估算法。将临床场景 1 给药与实际给药的结果进行比较,发现镇痛持续时间中位数增加了 6 分钟,苏醒时间中位数增加了 0.3 分钟。这是通过降低术中瑞芬太尼输注率、增加芬太尼给药方案和不改变丙泊酚输注率来实现的。将临床场景 2 给药与实际给药的结果进行比较,发现镇痛持续时间中位数增加了 26 分钟,苏醒时间中位数增加了 1.5 分钟。临床场景 2 的给药方案大大增加了芬太尼的给药方案,并大大降低了瑞芬太尼输注率,而丙泊酚输注率没有变化。对优化算法的初步分析结果表明,它似乎可以按预期运行。然而,需要进行临床研究以确定优化算法确定的最佳给药方案在不延迟临床环境中苏醒时间的情况下可以在多大程度上最大限度地延长术后镇痛持续时间。

相似文献

1
Optimizing intraoperative administration of propofol, remifentanil, and fentanyl through pharmacokinetic and pharmacodynamic simulations to increase the postoperative duration of analgesia.通过药代动力学和药效学模拟优化丙泊酚、瑞芬太尼和芬太尼的术中给药,以延长术后镇痛持续时间。
J Clin Monit Comput. 2019 Dec;33(6):959-971. doi: 10.1007/s10877-019-00298-9. Epub 2019 Mar 12.
2
Acceptance of a propofol and remifentanil infusion dosing algorithm to optimize postoperative emergence and analgesia.接受丙泊酚和瑞芬太尼输注剂量算法以优化术后苏醒和镇痛。
J Clin Monit Comput. 2019 Dec;33(6):953-957. doi: 10.1007/s10877-019-00295-y. Epub 2019 Mar 13.
3
Cost analysis of target-controlled infusion-based anesthesia compared with standard anesthesia regimens.基于靶控输注的麻醉与标准麻醉方案的成本分析。
Anesth Analg. 1999 Jan;88(1):77-82. doi: 10.1097/00000539-199901000-00015.
4
Remifentanil versus fentanyl in total intravenous anesthesia for lumbar spine surgery: a retrospective cohort study.瑞芬太尼与芬太尼用于腰椎手术全静脉麻醉:一项回顾性队列研究。
J Clin Anesth. 2015 Aug;27(5):391-5. doi: 10.1016/j.jclinane.2015.03.024. Epub 2015 Apr 23.
5
An outcome study comparing intravenous sedation with midazolam/fentanyl (conscious sedation) versus propofol infusion (deep sedation) for aesthetic surgery.一项比较咪达唑仑/芬太尼静脉镇静(清醒镇静)与丙泊酚输注(深度镇静)用于美容手术的结局研究。
Plast Reconstr Surg. 2003 Nov;112(6):1683-9; discussion 1690-1. doi: 10.1097/01.PRS.0000086363.34535.A4.
6
Effects of different dose regimens of magnesium on pharmacodynamics and anesthetic requirements of balanced general anesthesia.不同剂量方案的镁对平衡全身麻醉药效学及麻醉需求的影响。
J Egypt Soc Parasitol. 2007 Aug;37(2):469-82.
7
[Characterization of dose profile of remifentanil with computer simulation: comparative study with fentanyl and alfentanyl].[瑞芬太尼剂量分布的计算机模拟特征:与芬太尼和阿芬太尼的比较研究]
Rev Esp Anestesiol Reanim. 1998 Oct;45(8):317-25.
8
Sevoflurane versus PRopofol combined with Remifentanil anesthesia Impact on postoperative Neurologic function in supratentorial Gliomas (SPRING): protocol for a randomized controlled trial.七氟醚与丙泊酚复合瑞芬太尼麻醉对幕上脑胶质瘤患者术后神经功能的影响(SPRING):一项随机对照试验方案。
BMC Anesthesiol. 2020 May 19;20(1):117. doi: 10.1186/s12871-020-01035-5.
9
A comparison of remifentanil and morphine sulfate for acute postoperative analgesia after total intravenous anesthesia with remifentanil and propofol.瑞芬太尼与硫酸吗啡用于瑞芬太尼和丙泊酚全静脉麻醉术后急性镇痛的比较。
Anesthesiology. 1997 Aug;87(2):235-43. doi: 10.1097/00000542-199708000-00009.
10
The effects of plasma fentanyl concentrations on propofol requirement, emergence from anesthesia, and postoperative analgesia in propofol-nitrous oxide anesthesia.血浆芬太尼浓度对丙泊酚-氧化亚氮麻醉中丙泊酚需求量、麻醉苏醒及术后镇痛的影响。
Anesth Analg. 2000 Jun;90(6):1365-71. doi: 10.1097/00000539-200006000-00019.

引用本文的文献

1
Comparison of haemodynamic- and electroencephalographic-monitored effects evoked by four combinations of effect-site concentrations of propofol and remifentanil, yielding a predicted tolerance to laryngoscopy of 90.比较靶控输注丙泊酚和瑞芬太尼四种效应室浓度组合诱发的血流动力学和脑电图监测效应,预测对喉镜检查的耐受度为 90。
J Clin Monit Comput. 2021 Aug;35(4):815-825. doi: 10.1007/s10877-020-00540-9. Epub 2020 Jun 3.
2
End of year summary 2019: anaesthesia and airway management.2019 年年终总结:麻醉与气道管理。
J Clin Monit Comput. 2020 Feb;34(1):1-5. doi: 10.1007/s10877-019-00453-2. Epub 2020 Jan 2.
3
Administration of anesthetic drugs according to pharmacological principles: are we heading in the right direction?

本文引用的文献

1
Pharmacokinetic and pharmacodynamic interactions in anaesthesia. A review of current knowledge and how it can be used to optimize anaesthetic drug administration.麻醉中的药代动力学和药效学相互作用。对当前知识的回顾以及如何将其用于优化麻醉药物管理。
Br J Anaesth. 2017 Jan;118(1):44-57. doi: 10.1093/bja/aew312.
2
Navigator® and SmartPilot® View are helpful in guiding anesthesia and reducing anesthetic drug dosing.Navigator®和SmartPilot® View有助于指导麻醉并减少麻醉药物剂量。
Minerva Anestesiol. 2015 Nov;81(11):1163-9. Epub 2015 Jan 19.
3
All models are wrong.
根据药理学原理使用麻醉药物:我们是否正朝着正确的方向前进?
J Clin Monit Comput. 2019 Dec;33(6):945-947. doi: 10.1007/s10877-019-00376-y. Epub 2019 Aug 16.
4
Propofol Requirement in Patients with Growth Hormone-Secreting Pituitary Tumors Undergoing Transsphenoidal Surgery.经蝶窦手术治疗生长激素分泌型垂体瘤患者的丙泊酚需求量
J Clin Med. 2019 Apr 26;8(5):571. doi: 10.3390/jcm8050571.
所有模型都是错误的。
Anesthesiology. 2012 Feb;116(2):240-1. doi: 10.1097/ALN.0b013e318242a4a7.
4
Optimizing intravenous drug administration by applying pharmacokinetic/pharmacodynamic concepts.运用药代动力学/药效学概念优化静脉药物给药。
Br J Anaesth. 2011 Jul;107(1):38-47. doi: 10.1093/bja/aer108. Epub 2011 May 30.
5
An exploration of remifentanil-propofol combinations that lead to a loss of response to esophageal instrumentation, a loss of responsiveness, and/or onset of intolerable ventilatory depression.探索瑞芬太尼-丙泊酚联合应用导致食管器械反应丧失、无反应和/或无法耐受通气抑制的情况。
Anesth Analg. 2011 Sep;113(3):490-9. doi: 10.1213/ANE.0b013e318210fc45. Epub 2011 Mar 17.
6
Closed-loop coadministration of propofol and remifentanil guided by bispectral index: a randomized multicenter study.闭环丙泊酚和瑞芬太尼输注联合脑电双频指数指导:一项随机多中心研究。
Anesth Analg. 2011 Mar;112(3):546-57. doi: 10.1213/ANE.0b013e318205680b. Epub 2011 Jan 13.
7
An evaluation of remifentanil propofol response surfaces for loss of responsiveness, loss of response to surrogates of painful stimuli and laryngoscopy in patients undergoing elective surgery.对接受择期手术患者的瑞芬太尼-丙泊酚反应面进行评估,以确定意识消失、对疼痛刺激替代物反应消失及喉镜检查反应消失的情况。
Anesth Analg. 2008 Feb;106(2):471-9, table of contents. doi: 10.1213/ane.0b013e3181606c62.
8
A response surface analysis of propofol-remifentanil pharmacodynamic interaction in volunteers.志愿者中丙泊酚-瑞芬太尼药效学相互作用的响应面分析
Anesthesiology. 2004 Jun;100(6):1373-81. doi: 10.1097/00000542-200406000-00007.
9
Pharmacodynamic interaction between propofol and remifentanil regarding hypnosis, tolerance of laryngoscopy, bispectral index, and electroencephalographic approximate entropy.丙泊酚与瑞芬太尼在催眠、喉镜检查耐受性、脑电双频指数及脑电图近似熵方面的药效学相互作用。
Anesthesiology. 2004 Jun;100(6):1353-72. doi: 10.1097/00000542-200406000-00006.
10
Development and evaluation of a graphical anesthesia drug display.一种图形化麻醉药物展示的开发与评估
Anesthesiology. 2002 Mar;96(3):565-75. doi: 10.1097/00000542-200203000-00010.