Suppr超能文献

高血压患者长期血压控制与颈动脉僵硬度十年进展之间的关联:动脉粥样硬化的多民族研究

Association between long-term blood pressure control and ten-year progression in carotid arterial stiffness among hypertensive individuals: the multiethnic study of atherosclerosis.

作者信息

Tedla Yacob G, Gepner Adam D, Vaidya Dhananjay, Colangelo Laura, Stein James H, Liu Kiang, Greenland Philip

机构信息

aDepartment of Preventive Medicine, Northwestern University, Chicago, Illinois bDivision of Cardiovascular Medicine, University of Wisconsin Madison, Madison, Wisconsin cJohn Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, Maryland, USA.

出版信息

J Hypertens. 2017 Apr;35(4):862-869. doi: 10.1097/HJH.0000000000001199.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

Arterial stiffness was shown to be higher among hypertensive patients with diabetes than those without diabetes and among older than younger hypertensive patients. We examined whether the association between long-term blood pressure (BP) control and 10-year progression in carotid arterial stiffness varies by diabetes status and age.

METHODS

Participants were 906 individuals with hypertension at baseline and three follow-up visits in the Multi-Ethnic Study of Atherosclerosis (mean age 63.7 years, 44% males). Participants with SBP of less than 140 mmHg and DBP of less than 90 mmHg were considered to have a controlled BP. Arterial stiffness was measured using distensibility coefficient × 10/mmHg and Young's elastic modulus (YEM × 10 mmHg) at baseline and after a mean of 9.5 years (visit 5). Multiple linear regression model was used for the analysis.

RESULTS

Having controlled BP at three visits (distensibility coefficient: β = 3.6, P = 0.004; YEM: β = -6.8, P = 0.07) or four visits (distensibility coefficient: β = 2.4, P = 0.04; YEM: β = -6.8, P = 0.05), when compared with having uncontrolled BP at all four visit, was associated with lesser progression in arterial stiffness. In a stratified analysis, arterial stiffness progression was slower only among nondiabetics with controlled BP at three visits (distensibility coefficient: β = 4.3, P = 0.002; YEM: β = -8.8, P = 0.04) or four visits (β = 3.7, P = 0.01; YEM: β = -10.4, P = 0.01) and among those less than 70 years with controlled BP at three visits (distensibility coefficient: β = 4.9, P = 0.004; YEM: β = -10.6, P = 0.01) or four visits (distensibility coefficient: β = 2.9, P = 0.07; YEM: β = -7.6, P = 0.03).

CONCLUSION

These findings suggest that controlling BP alone may not be sufficient to slow progression of arterial stiffness among hypertensive patients with concurrent diabetes and elderly hypertensive patients.

摘要

背景

研究表明,糖尿病高血压患者的动脉僵硬度高于非糖尿病高血压患者,且老年高血压患者的动脉僵硬度高于年轻高血压患者。我们研究了长期血压(BP)控制与颈动脉僵硬度10年进展之间的关联是否因糖尿病状态和年龄而异。

方法

参与者为动脉粥样硬化多民族研究中906名基线时患有高血压且进行了三次随访的个体(平均年龄63.7岁,44%为男性)。收缩压低于140 mmHg且舒张压低于90 mmHg的参与者被认为血压得到控制。在基线时以及平均9.5年后(第5次访视),使用扩张系数×10/mmHg和杨氏弹性模量(YEM×10 mmHg)测量动脉僵硬度。采用多元线性回归模型进行分析。

结果

与四次访视时血压均未得到控制相比,三次访视时(扩张系数:β = 3.6,P = 0.004;YEM:β = -6.8,P = 0.07)或四次访视时(扩张系数:β = 2.4,P = 0.04;YEM:β = -6.8,P = 0.05)血压得到控制与动脉僵硬度进展较小相关。在分层分析中,仅在三次访视时(扩张系数:β = 4.3,P = 0.002;YEM:β = -8.8,P = 0.04)或四次访视时(β = 3.7,P = 0.01;YEM:β = -10.4,P = 0.01)血压得到控制的非糖尿病患者以及年龄小于70岁且三次访视时(扩张系数:β = 4.9,P = 0.004;YEM:β = -10.6,P = 0.01)或四次访视时(扩张系数:β = 2.9,P = 0.07;YEM:β = -7.6,P = 0.03)血压得到控制的患者中,动脉僵硬度进展较慢。

结论

这些发现表明,仅控制血压可能不足以减缓合并糖尿病的高血压患者和老年高血压患者的动脉僵硬度进展。

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验