Institute of Neuroscience and Medicine (INM-7: Brain and Behaviour), Research Centre Jülich, Jülich, Germany.
Institute of Systems Neuroscience, Heinrich Heine University Düsseldorf, Düsseldorf, Germany.
Elife. 2019 Mar 13;8:e43464. doi: 10.7554/eLife.43464.
Linking interindividual differences in psychological phenotype to variations in brain structure is an old dream for psychology and a crucial question for cognitive neurosciences. Yet, replicability of the previously-reported 'structural brain behavior' (SBB)-associations has been questioned, recently. Here, we conducted an empirical investigation, assessing replicability of SBB among heathy adults. For a wide range of psychological measures, the replicability of associations with gray matter volume was assessed. Our results revealed that among healthy individuals 1) finding an association between performance at standard psychological tests and brain morphology is relatively unlikely 2) significant associations, found using an exploratory approach, have overestimated effect sizes and 3) can hardly be replicated in an independent sample. After considering factors such as sample size and comparing our findings with more replicable SBB-associations in a clinical cohort and replicable associations between brain structure and non-psychological phenotype, we discuss the potential causes and consequences of these findings.
将个体心理表现的差异与大脑结构的变化联系起来,一直是心理学的一个夙愿,也是认知神经科学的一个关键问题。然而,先前报道的“结构脑行为”(SBB)关联的可重复性最近受到了质疑。在这里,我们进行了一项实证研究,评估了健康成年人中 SBB 的可重复性。我们评估了广泛的心理测量指标与灰质体积之间关联的可重复性。我们的结果表明,在健康个体中:1)在标准心理测试中的表现与大脑形态之间发现关联的可能性相对较低;2)使用探索性方法发现的显著关联高估了效应大小;3)在独立样本中几乎无法复制。在考虑了样本量等因素,并将我们的发现与临床队列中更具可重复性的 SBB 关联以及大脑结构与非心理表现型之间的可复制关联进行比较后,我们讨论了这些发现的潜在原因和后果。