The Adelson School of Entrepreneurship, Interdisciplinary Center (IDC), Herzliya, Israel.
Baruch Ivcher School of Psychology, Interdisciplinary Center (IDC), Herzliya, Israel.
PLoS One. 2019 Mar 13;14(3):e0212306. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0212306. eCollection 2019.
The wording negotiators use shapes the emotions of their counterparts. These emotions, in turn, influence their counterparts' economic decisions. Building on this rationale, we examined how the language used during negotiation affects discount rate and willingness to engage in future deals. In three studies, participants assumed the role of retailers. Alleged counterparts (actually a computerized program) asked for a discount under three conditions: request, want, and demand. Results show that less extreme language (request/want) resulted in better outcomes than demanding a discount. Moreover, while the language used by the customer had an effect on experienced emotions, the positive emotions (sympathy and empathy) participants felt toward the customer mediated the relationship between the linguistic cue and the negotiation outcome. Our results inform both psycholinguistic research and negotiation research by demonstrating the causal role of linguistic cues in activating concept-knowledge relevant to different emotional experiences, and point to the down-the-line impact on shaping negotiation preferences.
谈判者使用的措辞会影响对方的情绪。这些情绪反过来又会影响他们的经济决策。基于这一原理,我们研究了谈判中使用的语言如何影响折扣率和未来交易的意愿。在三项研究中,参与者扮演零售商的角色。所谓的对手(实际上是一个计算机程序)在三种情况下要求折扣:请求、想要和要求。结果表明,不那么极端的语言(请求/想要)比要求折扣产生更好的结果。此外,虽然客户使用的语言会影响到所经历的情绪,但参与者对客户的积极情绪(同情和同理心)会调解语言线索与谈判结果之间的关系。我们的研究结果通过证明语言线索在激活与不同情绪体验相关的概念知识方面的因果作用,为心理语言学研究和谈判研究提供了信息,并指出了对塑造谈判偏好的后续影响。