Cambridge Judge Business School, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, United Kingdom.
PLoS One. 2019 Mar 13;14(3):e0212634. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0212634. eCollection 2019.
Research into sports team performance has shown that across many sports and league competitions, teams that change their coaches after a decline in performance do rebound, but fare no better on average than teams that have not changed their coach in a similar situation. A similar lack of succession benefits has been reported in studies of manager and CEO succession: it has not been established that changing a team's leader improves a declining team's performance. We study the effect of a change of coach on the performance of a professional soccer team. Based on rarely obtained access to a whole season (one year) of daily close observation of the team and coaching staff in practice and matches, this study uses quantitative and qualitative data to go beyond the "average" pattern reported in the literature. We document in detail how, in a single team case study over an entire season, the processes in leadership behavior changed with a change of coach, the effect this had on the state of mind of the team, how the match behaviors of the players changed, and how these changes translated into improved performance. The process effects of a leadership change on the performance of a sports team may hold insights for leader succession in management: in addition to the aggregate organizational and experience fit of the new team leader, the specific leadership processes introduced by the new leader are critical for performance effects.
研究表明,在许多运动和联赛中,表现下滑后更换教练的团队会反弹,但在类似情况下,表现并不比没有更换教练的团队更好。在经理人和首席执行官继任的研究中也报告了类似的继任收益缺失:尚未确定更换团队领导是否能提高表现不佳的团队的绩效。我们研究了教练更换对职业足球队表现的影响。基于很少获得的一整季(一年)对球队和教练团队在训练和比赛中的日常近距离观察的机会,这项研究使用定量和定性数据超越了文献中报告的“平均”模式。我们详细记录了在一个整个赛季的单一团队案例研究中,领导行为的变化过程,以及这种变化对球队心态的影响,球员的比赛行为如何发生变化,以及这些变化如何转化为绩效的提高。领导更换对运动队表现的过程影响可能为管理中的领导者继任提供了一些见解:除了新团队领导者的总体组织和经验契合度外,新领导者引入的具体领导过程对于绩效影响至关重要。