• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

成人II型齿状突骨折的治疗

Management of Type II Odontoid Fractures in Adults.

作者信息

Bronson Wesley H, Protopsaltis Themistocles

出版信息

Bull Hosp Jt Dis (2013). 2019 Mar;77(1):4-10.

PMID:30865859
Abstract

Fractures of the odontoid represent as much as 20% of cervical spine fractures in adults, and they are the most common spine fracture in patients over 80 years of age. Despite their prevalence, the management of these fractures remains highly controversial. In particular, there is much debate concerning the management of type II fractures, or fractures occurring about the waist of the odontoid. We will review the epidemiology, evaluation, management-both operative and non-operative-and outcomes of adults with type II odontoid fractures. We will particularly focus on debates concerning hard collar versus halo, anterior versus posterior surgery, the management of odontoid nonunions, as well as questions about risks and benefits of surgery in the very elderly.

摘要

齿突骨折占成人颈椎骨折的20%,是80岁以上患者最常见的脊柱骨折。尽管其发病率较高,但这些骨折的治疗仍存在很大争议。特别是,关于II型骨折(即齿突腰部骨折)的治疗存在诸多争论。我们将回顾II型齿突骨折成人患者的流行病学、评估、手术及非手术治疗方法和治疗结果。我们将特别关注关于硬颈托与头环、前路与后路手术、齿突不愈合的治疗,以及高龄患者手术风险和益处的相关争论。

相似文献

1
Management of Type II Odontoid Fractures in Adults.成人II型齿状突骨折的治疗
Bull Hosp Jt Dis (2013). 2019 Mar;77(1):4-10.
2
Rationale and design of the INNOVATE Trial: an international cooperative study on surgical versus conservative treatment for odontoid fractures in the elderly.《INNOVATE 试验的原理和设计:一项关于老年人齿状突骨折手术与保守治疗的国际合作研究》
BMC Musculoskelet Disord. 2014 Jan 8;15:7. doi: 10.1186/1471-2474-15-7.
3
Surgical vs. non-surgical management of displaced type-2 odontoid fractures in patients aged 75 years and older: study protocol for a randomised controlled trial.75岁及以上患者移位型Ⅱ型齿状突骨折的手术与非手术治疗:一项随机对照试验的研究方案
Trials. 2018 Aug 22;19(1):452. doi: 10.1186/s13063-018-2690-8.
4
Surgical treatment of unstable type II odontoid fractures in skeletally mature individuals.骨成熟个体不稳定型 II 型齿状突骨折的手术治疗。
Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2010 Oct 1;35(21 Suppl):S209-18. doi: 10.1097/BRS.0b013e3181f32ca5.
5
[Anterior osteosynthesis of odontoid fractures].[齿状突骨折的前路骨合成]
Acta Chir Orthop Traumatol Cech. 2008 Oct;75(5):332-8.
6
Nonoperative management of odontoid fractures using a halothoracic vest.使用半胸式背心对齿突骨折进行非手术治疗。
Neurosurgery. 2007 Sep;61(3):522-9; discussion 529-30. doi: 10.1227/01.NEU.0000290898.15567.21.
7
Management of type II odontoid fractures in the geriatric population: outcome of treatment in a rigid cervical orthosis.老年人群中II型齿状突骨折的治疗:刚性颈椎矫形器治疗的结果
J Spinal Disord Tech. 2010 Jul;23(5):317-20. doi: 10.1097/BSD.0b013e3181b11d9f.
8
The comparison of clinical outcome of fresh type II odontoid fracture treatment between anterior cannulated screws fixation and posterior instrumentation of C1-2 without fusion: a retrospective cohort study.新鲜Ⅱ型齿状突骨折治疗中空心加压螺钉前路固定与C1-2后路内固定不融合的临床疗效比较:一项回顾性队列研究。
J Orthop Surg Res. 2018 Jan 8;13(1):3. doi: 10.1186/s13018-017-0702-0.
9
Deadly falls: operative versus nonoperative management of Type II odontoid process fracture in octogenarians.致命性跌倒:老年患者Ⅱ型齿状突骨折的手术治疗与非手术治疗
J Neurosurg Spine. 2017 Jan;26(1):4-9. doi: 10.3171/2016.3.SPINE151202. Epub 2016 Aug 19.
10
Surgical management of acute odontoid fractures: surgery-related complications and long-term outcomes in a consecutive series of 97 patients.急性枢椎骨折的手术治疗:97 例连续病例的手术相关并发症和长期结果。
J Trauma Acute Care Surg. 2012 Mar;72(3):682-90. doi: 10.1097/TA.0b013e318236b675.

引用本文的文献

1
Rotation Preserving Fixation for the Treatment of C1 Burst Fracture Combined With Type II Odontoid Fracture: 2 Case Reports and Literature Review.旋转保留固定治疗C1爆裂骨折合并II型齿状突骨折:2例报告及文献复习
Int J Spine Surg. 2024 Nov 8;18(5):617-625. doi: 10.14444/8646.