Deakin Health Economics, Centre for Population Health Research, Deakin University, Geelong, VIC 3127, Australia.
Global Obesity Centre, Centre for Population Health Research, Deakin University, Geelong, VIC 3127, Australia.
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2019 Mar 7;16(5):834. doi: 10.3390/ijerph16050834.
To assess the cost-effectiveness of workplace-delivered interventions designed to reduce sitting time as primary prevention measures for cardiovascular disease (CVD) in Australia.
A Markov model was developed to simulate the lifetime cost-effectiveness of a workplace intervention for the primary prevention of CVD amongst office-based workers. An updated systematic review and a meta-analysis of workplace interventions that aim to reduce sitting time was conducted to inform the intervention effect. The primary outcome was workplace standing time. An incremental cost-effectiveness ratio (ICER) was calculated for this intervention measured against current practice. Costs (in Australia dollars) and benefits were discounted at 3% annually. Both deterministic (DSA) and probabilistic (PSA) sensitivity analyses were performed.
The updated systematic review identified only one new study. Only the multicomponent intervention that included a sit-and-stand workstation showed statistically significant changes in the standing time compared to the control. The intervention was associated with both higher costs ($6820 versus $6524) and benefits (23.28 versus 23.27, quality-adjusted life year, QALYs), generating an ICER of $43,825/QALY. The DSA showed that target age group for the intervention, relative risk of CVD relative to the control and intervention cost were the key determinants of the ICER. The base case results were within the range of the 95% confidence interval and the intervention had a 85.2% probability of being cost-effective.
A workplace-delivered intervention in the office-based setting including a sit-and-stand desk component is a cost-effective strategy for the primary prevention of CVD. It offers a new option and location when considering interventions to target the growing CVD burden.
评估旨在减少澳大利亚工作场所久坐时间的干预措施作为心血管疾病(CVD)一级预防措施的成本效益。
建立了一个马尔可夫模型,以模拟针对办公室工作者的 CVD 一级预防的工作场所干预的终生成本效益。对旨在减少久坐时间的工作场所干预措施进行了更新的系统评价和荟萃分析,以提供干预效果信息。主要结果是工作场所站立时间。针对当前实践,计算了该干预措施的增量成本效益比(ICER)。成本(澳元)和收益按每年 3%贴现。进行了确定性(DSA)和概率性(PSA)敏感性分析。
更新的系统评价仅确定了一项新研究。只有包括坐站两用工作站的多组分干预措施与对照组相比,站立时间显示出统计学上的显著变化。干预措施与更高的成本(6820 澳元比 6524 澳元)和收益(23.28 比 23.27,质量调整生命年,QALY)相关,产生了 43825 澳元/QALY 的 ICER。DSA 表明,干预的目标年龄组、与对照组相比 CVD 的相对风险和干预成本是 ICER 的关键决定因素。基本情况结果在 95%置信区间范围内,干预措施有 85.2%的可能性具有成本效益。
在办公室环境中提供的工作场所干预措施,包括坐站两用办公桌组件,是预防 CVD 的一种具有成本效益的策略。在考虑针对日益增长的 CVD 负担的干预措施时,它提供了一个新的选择和位置。